Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
London Symphony Orchestra
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Reputation== The LSO has, on at least three occasions, been ranked as one of the world's leading orchestras.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.classical-music.com/features/articles/worlds-best-orchestras/|title=The best orchestras in the world}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.gramophone.co.uk/features/article/the-world-s-greatest-orchestras|title = The World's Greatest Orchestras}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://ledgernote.com/blog/interesting/best-orchestras-in-the-world/|title = Top 10 Best Orchestras in the World|date = 9 February 2021}}</ref> In a 1988 ''Gramophone'' article James Jolly said of it: <blockquote>Some would claim ... that it is the most American of our orchestras, thinking no doubt of the Previn legacy, Bernstein's Presidency and Tilson Thomas's appointment. Others, looking back further to Pierre Monteux's reign, think it our most French orchestra, a quality nurtured by Previn and latterly Claudio Abbado. But what of their essaying of the Slavonic repertoire under Istvan Kertész, or of Mahler, whose idiom has been finely honed by Abbado? No, the LSO remains enigmatic, unpredictable and supremely individual. Of all the London orchestras, the LSO seems to have more "personalities", more "individuals" and has given the solo world more than its fair share of "star" performers. As an orchestra the LSO has never been prepared to submit to one principal conductor for long (one thinks of Karajan in Berlin, Haitink in Amsterdam or Mravinsky in Leningrad){{#tag:ref|[[Herbert von Karajan]] was chief conductor of the Berlin Philharmonic from 1954 to 1989; [[Bernard Haitink]] was chief conductor of the [[Concertgebouw Orchestra]], Amsterdam from 1961 to 1988; [[Evgeny Mravinsky]] was chief conductor of the [[Leningrad Philharmonic]] from 1938 to 1988.<ref>Brunner, Gerhard. [http://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/subscriber/article/grove/music/14696 "Karajan, Herbert von"]; [[Noël Goodwin|Goodwin, Noël]]. [http://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/subscriber/article/grove/music/12190 "Haitink, Bernard"]; and Bowen, José. [http://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/subscriber/article/grove/music/19278 "Mravinsky, Evgeny"]; all in ''Grove Music Online'', Oxford Music Online. Retrieved 17 July 2012 {{subscription required}}</ref>|group= n}} but one of its greatest strengths remains its ability to attract fine conductors and dedicate itself wholeheartedly to creating a genuine performance.<ref name=jolly/></blockquote> For many years, the LSO had a reputation as an almost exclusively male ensemble (female harpists excepted). Morrison describes the LSO of the 1960s and 1970s as "a rambunctious boys' club that swaggered round the globe."<ref>Morrison, p. 251</ref> Before the 1970s one of the few women to play in the orchestra was the oboist [[Evelyn Barbirolli|Evelyn Rothwell]], who joined in the 1930s and found herself regarded as an outsider by her male colleagues.<ref>Morrison, pp. 186–187</ref> She was not admitted to full membership of the orchestra: the first woman to be elected as a member of the LSO was Renata Scheffel-Stein in 1975.<ref>Greenfield, Edward. "Orchestra strives", ''The Guardian'', 8 August 1975, p. 8</ref> By that time other British orchestras had left the LSO far behind in this regard.{{#tag:ref|In 1971 the BBC SO had 16 women players, the LPO and Philharmonia (by then known as the New Philharmonia) 12 each. The proportion of female players was considerably higher in the main regional orchestras.<ref>Ford, Christopher. "The eternal triangle: Men, women, and the orchestras", ''The Guardian'', 28 May 1971, p. 9</ref>|group= n}} By 2004, about 20 per cent of the LSO's members were women. Some musicians, including Davis, judged that this improved the orchestra's playing as well as its behaviour.<ref name=m187>Morrison, p. 187</ref> Others, including Previn and the veteran principal trumpet [[Maurice Murphy (musician)|Maurice Murphy]], felt that although the technical standard of playing had improved, the diminution of the orchestra's machismo was a matter for regret.<ref name=m187/> Comparing the LSO of 2004 with the orchestra of the 1960s and 1970s, Murphy said, "Now the strings have improved so much, the playing is fantastic, but it has lost something of its gung-ho quality."<ref>''Quoted'' in Morrison, p. 187</ref> The orchestra of the 1960s had a reputation for tormenting conductors it disliked; even such notorious martinets as [[George Szell]] were given a hard time.<ref>Morrison, p. 123</ref> By the 21st century the orchestra had long abandoned such aggression; civilities were maintained even with conductors whom the orchestra took against: they were simply never re-engaged.<ref>Morrison, p. 124</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
London Symphony Orchestra
(section)
Add topic