Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Hex (board game)
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Determinacy=== It is not difficult to convince oneself by exposition, that hex cannot end in a draw, referred to as the "hex theorem". I.e., no matter how the board is filled with stones, there will always be one and only one player who has connected their edges. This fact was known to Piet Hein in 1942, who mentioned it as one of his design criteria for Hex in the original Politiken article.<ref name="HexFullStory"/>{{rp|29}} Hein also stated this fact as "a barrier for your opponent is a connection for you".<ref name="HexFullStory"/>{{rp|35}} John Nash wrote up a proof of this fact around 1949,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hayward |first1=Ryan B. |last2=Rijswijck, van |first2=Jack |title=Hex and combinatorics |journal=Discrete Mathematics |date=6 October 2006 |volume=306 |issue=19β20 |pages=2515β2528 |doi=10.1016/j.disc.2006.01.029 |doi-access= }}</ref> but apparently did not publish the proof. Its first exposition appears in an in-house technical report in 1952,<ref>Nash, John (Feb. 1952). Rand Corp. technical report D-1164: Some Games and Machines for Playing Them. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/documents/2015/D1164.pdf {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170121094752/https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/documents/2015/D1164.pdf |date=21 January 2017 }}</ref> in which Nash states that "connection and blocking the opponent are equivalent acts". A more rigorous proof was published by [[John R. Pierce]] in his 1961 book ''Symbols, Signals, and Noise''.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Hayward |first1=Ryan B. |last2=Toft |first2=Bjarne |title=Hex, inside and out : the full story |year=2019 |publisher=CRC Press |location=Boca Raton, Florida |isbn=978-0367144258 |page=99}}</ref> In 1979, [[David Gale]] published a proof that the determinacy of Hex is equivalent to the two-dimensional [[Brouwer fixed-point theorem]], and that the determinacy of higher-dimensional ''n''-player variants proves the fixed-point theorem in general.<ref>{{cite journal|author=David Gale |year=1979|title=The Game of Hex and Brouwer Fixed-Point Theorem | journal=The American Mathematical Monthly | volume=86 | pages=818β827|doi=10.2307/2320146|jstor=2320146|issue=10|publisher=Mathematical Association of America}}</ref> An informal proof of the no-draw property of Hex can be sketched as follows: consider the connected component of one of the red edges. This component either includes the opposite red edge, in which case Red has a connection, or else it does not, in which case the blue stones along the boundary of the connected component form a winning path for Blue. The concept of a connected component is well-defined because in a hexagonal grid, two cells can only meet in an edge or not at all; it is not possible for cells to overlap in a single point.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Hex (board game)
(section)
Add topic