Editing Dreyfus affair (section)

=== The enquiry ===
On 3 November 1894, General Saussier, the [[Military governor of Paris]], reluctantly<ref>He characterised the report by du Paty as "rantings" (Bredin, ''The Affair'', p. 88.) {{in lang|fr}}</ref> gave the order for an enquiry. He had the power to stop the process but did not, perhaps because of an exaggerated confidence in military justice.<ref>Supreme Court, ''Justice From the Dreyfus Affair'', Duclert, p. 103. {{in lang|fr}}</ref> Major Besson d'Ormescheville, the recorder for the Military Court, wrote an indictment in which "moral elements" of the charge (which gossiped about the habits of Dreyfus and his alleged attendance at "gambling circles", his knowledge of German, and his "remarkable memory") were developed more extensively than the "material elements",<ref group="Note">These are treated in the single penultimate paragraph in one sentence: "The material elements consist of the incriminating letter including review by the majority of experts as well as by us and by the witnesses who have seen it until now except for those who wilfully see differences, showing a complete similarity with the authentic writing of Captain Dreyfus".</ref> which are rarely seen in the charge:

"This is a proof of guilt because Dreyfus made everything disappear".

The complete lack of neutrality of the indictment led to Émile Zola calling it a "monument of bias".<ref>Zola, "[[J'accuse...!]]" {{in lang|fr}}</ref>

After the news broke on Dreyfus' arrest, many journalists flocked to the story and flooded the story with speculations and accusations. The renowned journalist and antisemitic agitator [[Edouard Drumont]] wrote in his publication on November 3, 1894, "What a terrible lesson, this disgraceful treason of the Jew Dreyfus."

On 4 December 1894, Dreyfus was referred to the first Military Court with this dossier. The secrecy was lifted and Demange could access the file for the first time. After reading it the lawyer had absolute confidence, as he saw the emptiness of the prosecution's case.<ref>Bredin, ''The Affair'', p. 89. {{in lang|fr}}</ref> The prosecution rested completely on the writing on a single piece of paper, the bordereau, on which experts disagreed, and on vague indirect testimonies.