Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Constitution of Japan
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Renunciation of war (Article 9) === {{Main|Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution}} Under Article 9, "the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes". To this end, the article provides that "land, sea, and air forces, as well as another war potential, will never be maintained". The necessity and practical extent of Article 9 have been debated in Japan since its enactment, particularly following the establishment of the [[Japan Self-Defence Forces]] (JSDF) in 1954, a ''de facto'' post-war Japanese military force that substitutes for the [[Armed Forces of the Empire of Japan|pre-war Armed Forces]], since 1 July 1954. Some lower courts have found the JSDF unconstitutional, but the [[Supreme Court of Japan|Supreme Court]] never ruled on this issue.<ref name=":0" /> Individuals have also challenged the presence of [[United States Forces Japan|U.S. forces in Japan]] as well as the [[Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security Between the United States and Japan|U.S.-Japan Security Treaty]] under Article 9 of the Constitution of Japan.<ref name=":1">{{cite journal |last1=Chen |first1=Po Liang |last2=Wada |first2=Jordan T. |title=Can the Japanese Supreme Court Overcome the Political Question Hurdle? |journal=Washington International Law Journal |date=2017 |volume=26 |pages=349β79 |url=https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj/vol26/iss2/8/}}</ref> The [[Supreme Court of Japan]] has found that the stationing of U.S. forces did not violate Article 9, because it did not involve forces under Japanese command.<ref name=":1" /> The Court ruled the U.S.-Japan Security Treaty to be a highly sensitive political question, and declined to rule on its legality under the [[Political question#Japan|political question doctrine]].<ref name=":1" /> Various political groups have called for either revising or abolishing the restrictions of Article 9 to permit collective defense efforts and strengthen Japan's military capabilities.<ref name="Japan LDP policy chief Inada calls for changing pacifist constitution">{{cite news |last1=Calls for revision |first1=Japan LDP Chief |title=Japan's LDP Chief Calls for Revision of Article 9 Pacifist Rule |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/japan-election-inada/japan-ldp-policy-chief-inada-calls-for-changing-pacifist-constitution-idUKT9N16400H |access-date=4 May 2022 |work=Reuters |publisher=Reuters Staff |date=10 July 2016}}</ref> On July 1, 2014, the [[Cabinet of Japan]] approved a reinterpretation of Article 9 to allow the nation to engage in "collective self-defense."<ref>{{Cite web |title=A Primer on Japan's Constitutional Reinterpretation and Right to Collective Self-Defense |url=https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/primer-japans-constitutional-reinterpretation-and-right-collective-self-defense |access-date=2024-03-08 |website=Default |language=en}}</ref> The United States has pressured Japan to amend Article 9 and to rearm<ref>{{cite web|title=Article 9 and the U.S.-Japan Security Treaty {{!}} Asia for Educators {{!}} Columbia University|url=http://afe.easia.columbia.edu/special/japan_1950_usjapan.htm|access-date=2021-05-24|website=afe.easia.columbia.edu}}</ref><ref name="Takenaka">{{Cite news|last=Takenaka|first=Linda Sieg, Kiyoshi|date=2014-07-01|title=Japan takes historic step from post-war pacifism, OKs fighting for allies|language=en|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-defense-idUSKBN0F52S120140701|access-date=2021-05-24}}</ref> as early as 1948<ref name="Umeda">{{cite web|last=Umeda|first=Sayuri|date=September 2015|title=Japan: Interpretations of Article 9 of the Constitution|url=https://www.loc.gov/law/help/japan-constitution/interpretations-article9.php|access-date=2021-05-24|website=www.loc.gov}}</ref> with Japan gradually expanding its military capabilities, "sidestepping constitutional constraints".<ref>{{cite web|last=Kingston|first=Jeff|date=2020-11-11|title=Japan's quiet rearmament|url=https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/japans-quiet-rearmament-shinzo-abe|access-date=2021-05-24|website=Prospect Magazine|language=en-US}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Constitution of Japan
(section)
Add topic