Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Condom
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Types == Most condoms have a reservoir tip or teat end, making it easier to accommodate the man's ejaculate. Condoms come in different sizes and shapes.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Nelson |first1=Anita L. |last2=Woodward |first2=Jo Ann |title=Sexually Transmitted Diseases: A Practical Guide for Primary Care |date=2007 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-1-59745-040-9 |page=312 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7U9ZE_8y0kwC&pg=PA312 |access-date=11 September 2020 |archive-date=4 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210504112733/https://books.google.com/books?id=7U9ZE_8y0kwC&pg=PA312 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=WHO2010>{{cite book |title=Male latex condom. Specification, prequalification and guidelines for procurement, 2010 |date=2010 |publisher=World Health Organization |isbn=978-92-4-159990-0 |page=127 |url=https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/9789241599900/en/ |access-date=4 October 2020 |archive-date=27 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180927033913/http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/9789241599900/en/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Corson |first1=S. L. |last2=Derman |first2=R. J. |title=Fertility Control |date=1995 |publisher=CRC Press |isbn=978-0-9697978-0-7 |page=263 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=30EzZPp1ypYC&pg=PA263 |access-date=11 September 2020 |archive-date=4 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210504112644/https://books.google.com/books?id=30EzZPp1ypYC&pg=PA263 |url-status=live }}</ref> They also come in a variety of surfaces intended to stimulate the user's partner.<ref name=WHO2010/> Condoms are usually supplied with a [[Personal lubricant|lubricant]] coating to facilitate penetration, while [[flavored condom]]s are principally used for oral sex.<ref name=WHO2010/> As mentioned above, most condoms are made of latex, but [[#Synthetic|polyurethane]] and [[#Lambskin|lambskin]] condoms also exist. === Internal condom === {{Main|Internal condom}} [[File:Préservatif féminin.jpg|thumb|right|An internal condom]] External condoms have a tight ring to form a seal around the penis, while internal condoms usually have a large stiff ring to prevent them from slipping into the [[body orifice]]. The Female Health Company produced an internal condom that was initially made of polyurethane, but newer versions are made of [[nitrile rubber]]. Medtech Products produces an internal condom made of latex.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.avert.org/female-condom.htm |title=The Female Condom |publisher=AVERT |access-date=26 March 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131228152904/http://www.avert.org/female-condom.htm |archive-date=28 December 2013}}</ref> === Materials === ==== Natural latex ==== [[File:Condom unrolled durex.jpg|thumb|375px|An unrolled latex condom]] Latex has outstanding elastic properties: Its [[tensile strength]] exceeds 30 MPa, and latex condoms may be stretched in excess of 800% before breaking.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Relationship of condom strength to failure during use |journal=PIACT Prod News |volume=2 |issue=2 |pages=1–2 |year=1980 |pmid=12264044 |author1=Program for the Introduction and Adaptation of Contraceptive Technology PIACT}}</ref> In 1990 the [[International Organization for Standardization|ISO]] set standards for condom production (ISO 4074, Natural latex rubber condoms), and the [[European Union|EU]] followed suit with its [[European Committee for Standardization|CEN]] standard (Directive 93/42/EEC concerning medical devices). Every latex condom is tested for holes with an electric current. If the condom passes, it is rolled and packaged. In addition, a portion of each batch of condoms is subject to water leak and air burst testing.<ref name="badnews">{{cite journal |last=Nordenberg |first=Tamar |title=Condoms: Barriers to Bad News |journal=[[FDA Consumer]] |date=March–April 1998 |volume=32 |issue=2 |pages=22–5 |pmid=9532952 |url=https://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ByAudience/ForPatientAdvocates/HIVandAIDSActivities/ucm126370.htm |access-date=7 June 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100308051921/https://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ByAudience/ForPatientAdvocates/HIVandAIDSActivities/ucm126370.htm |archive-date=8 March 2010}}</ref> While the advantages of latex have made it the most popular condom material, it does have some drawbacks. Latex condoms are damaged when used with oil-based substances as [[Personal lubricant|lubricants]], such as [[petroleum jelly]], [[cooking oil]], [[baby oil]], [[mineral oil]], [[skin lotion]]s, [[Sunscreen|suntan lotions]], [[cold cream]]s, [[butter]] or [[margarine]].<ref>[http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42331/1/1885960018_eng.pdf Essentials of Contraceptive Technology > Chapter 11 Condoms] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170808195319/http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42331/1/1885960018_eng.pdf |date=8 August 2017 }} From the Knowledge for Health Project, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Retrieved July 2010.</ref> Contact with oil makes latex condoms more likely to break or slip off due to loss of elasticity caused by the oils.<ref name="fhi3">{{cite journal |last=Spruyt |first=Alan B |title=Chapter 3: User Behaviors and Characteristics Related to Condom Failure |journal=The Latex Condom: Recent Advances, Future Directions |url=http://www.fhi.org/en/RH/Pubs/booksReports/latexcondom/behavcharac.htm |year=1998 |access-date=8 April 2007 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110927122314/http://www.fhi.org/en/RH/Pubs/booksReports/latexcondom/behavcharac.htm |archive-date=27 September 2011}}</ref> Additionally, [[latex allergy]] precludes use of latex condoms and is one of the principal reasons for the use of other materials. In May 2009, the U.S. [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA) granted approval for the production of condoms composed of [[Vytex]],<ref>{{cite press release |title=FDA Clearance for Envy Natural Rubber Latex Condom Made with Vytex NRL |publisher=Vystar |date=6 May 2009 |url=http://www.vytex.com/BizDocs/R-EnvyFDA_Clearance.pdf |access-date=26 August 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111007172424/http://www.vytex.com/BizDocs/R-EnvyFDA_Clearance.pdf |archive-date=7 October 2011}}</ref> latex that has been treated to remove 90% of the [[antibody generator|proteins responsible for allergic reactions]].<ref>{{cite web |title=How Vytex Works |publisher=Vystar |year=2009 |url=http://www.vytex.com/Consumers/howvytexworks.aspx?pageid=C8 |access-date=26 August 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100530223349/http://www.vytex.com/Consumers/howvytexworks.aspx?pageid=C8 |archive-date=30 May 2010}}</ref> An allergen-free condom made of synthetic latex (polyisoprene) is also available.<ref name="isoprenepr" /> ==== Synthetic ==== The most common non-latex condoms are made from [[polyurethane]]. Condoms may also be made from other synthetic materials, such as [[AT-10 resin]], and most [[polyisoprene]].<ref name="isoprenepr">{{cite press release |title=Lifestyles Condoms Introduces Polyisoprene Non-latex |publisher=HealthNewsDigest.com |date=31 July 2008 |url=http://healthnewsdigest.com/news/New_Product_460/Lifestyles_Condoms_printer.shtml |access-date=24 August 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080823054656/http://healthnewsdigest.com/news/New_Product_460/Lifestyles_Condoms_printer.shtml |archive-date=23 August 2008}}</ref> Polyurethane condoms tend to be the same width and thickness as latex condoms, with most polyurethane condoms between 0.04 mm and 0.07 mm thick.<ref>{{cite web |title=Condoms |work=Condom Statistics and Sizes |date=12 March 2008 |url=http://blog.condomman.com/articles/condom-use/all-you-need-to-know-on-condom-statistics-and-sizes/ |access-date=31 May 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130525205018/http://blog.condomman.com/articles/condom-use/all-you-need-to-know-on-condom-statistics-and-sizes/ |archive-date=25 May 2013}}</ref> Polyurethane can be considered better than latex in several ways: it conducts heat better than latex, is not as sensitive to temperature and ultraviolet light (and so has less rigid storage requirements and a longer shelf life), can be used with oil-based [[Personal lubricant|lubricants]], is less allergenic than latex, and does not have an odor.<ref name="nonlatex">{{cite journal |title=Nonlatex vs Latex Condoms: An Update |journal=The Contraception Report |volume=14 |issue=2 |date=September 2003 |url=http://www.contraceptiononline.org/contrareport/article01.cfm?art=243 |access-date=14 August 2006 |archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20060926035226/http://www.contraceptiononline.org/contrareport/article01.cfm?art=243 |archive-date = 26 September 2006 |url-status=dead}}</ref> Polyurethane condoms have gained FDA approval for sale in the United States as an effective method of contraception and HIV prevention, and under laboratory conditions have been shown to be just as effective as latex for these purposes.<ref name="AlicePolyLatex">{{cite web |title=Are polyurethane condoms as effective as latex ones? |publisher=Columbia University |date=22 February 2005 |url=http://www.goaskalice.columbia.edu/1842.html |access-date=25 May 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070530000038/http://www.goaskalice.columbia.edu/1842.html |archive-date=30 May 2007}}</ref> However, polyurethane condoms are less elastic than latex ones, and may be more likely to slip or break than latex,<ref name="nonlatex" /><ref name="AlicePoly">{{cite web |title=Prefers polyurethane protection |publisher=Columbia University |date=4 March 2005 |url=http://www.goaskalice.columbia.edu/1203.html |access-date=25 May 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070609115429/http://www.goaskalice.columbia.edu/1203.html |archive-date=9 June 2007}}</ref> lose their shape or bunch up more than latex,<ref name="PPAA">{{cite news |title=Allergic to Latex? You Can Still Have Safer Sex |url=http://blog.advocatesaz.org/2012/05/02/allergic-to-latex-you-can-still-have-safer-sex |access-date=2 May 2012 |publisher=Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona |date=2 May 2012 |url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120910032846/http://blog.advocatesaz.org/2012/05/02/allergic-to-latex-you-can-still-have-safer-sex/|archive-date=10 September 2012}}</ref> and are more expensive. Polyisoprene is a synthetic version of natural rubber latex. While significantly more expensive,<ref name="isopreneglove">{{cite web |title=Polyisoprene Surgical Gloves |publisher=SurgicalGlove.net |year=2008 |url=http://www.surgicalglove.net/polyisoprene.html | access-date = 24 August 2008 | url-status = live | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080918193917/http://www.surgicalglove.net/polyisoprene.html | archive-date = 18 September 2008}}</ref> it has the advantages of latex (such as being softer and more elastic than polyurethane condoms)<ref name="isoprenepr" /> without the protein which is responsible for latex allergies.<ref name="isopreneglove" /> Unlike polyurethane condoms, they cannot be used with an oil-based lubricant.<ref name="PPAA" /> ==== Lambskin ==== Condoms made from [[sheep]] [[intestine]]s, labeled "lambskin", are also available. Although they are generally effective as a contraceptive by blocking sperm, studies have found that they are less effective than latex in preventing the transmission of [[sexually transmitted infections]] because of pores in the material.<ref>{{cite book |author=Boston Women's Health Book Collective |title=Our Bodies, Ourselves: A New Edition for a New Era |publisher=Touchstone |location=New York, NY |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-7432-5611-7 |page=[https://archive.org/details/ourbodiesoursel00bost/page/333 333] |url=https://archive.org/details/ourbodiesoursel00bost/page/333}}</ref> This is because intestines, by their nature, are porous, permeable membranes, and while sperm are too large to pass through the pores, viruses—such as [[HIV]], [[herpes]], and [[genital warts]]—are small enough to pass.<ref name="PPAA" /> As a result of laboratory data on condom porosity, in 1989, the FDA began requiring lambskin condom manufacturers to indicate that the products were not to be used for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections.<ref name="books.google.com">{{cite web |title=FDA Consumer Investigative Reports - Condoms Relabeled for Accuracy |date=January 1992 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LIct5Kf9iHcC&pg=SA1992-PA42 |access-date=23 September 2019 |archive-date=4 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210504112841/https://books.google.com/books?id=LIct5Kf9iHcC&pg=SA1992-PA42 |url-status=live }}</ref> The FDA cautions that while lambskin condoms "provide good birth control and a varying degree of protection against some, but not all, sexually transmitted diseases", people do not know what STIs a partner might have, and thus cannot assume that a lambskin condom will protect them.<ref name="books.google.com"/> While lambskin condoms avoid triggering [[latex allergies]], [[polyurethane]] condoms do as well, while also protecting more reliably against STIs.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Taylor |first1=James S. |last2=Erkek |first2=Emel |date=2004-08-24 |title=Latex allergy: diagnosis and management |journal=Dermatologic Therapy |language=en |volume=17 |issue=4 |pages=289–301 |doi=10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04024.x |issn=1396-0296|doi-access=free |pmid=15327474 }}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite journal |last=Kulig |first=John |date=October 2003 |title=Condoms: the basics and beyond |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15122165 |journal=Adolescent Medicine |volume=14 |issue=3 |pages=633–645, vii |doi=10.1016/S1041349903500494 |doi-broken-date=1 November 2024 |issn=1041-3499 |pmid=15122165}}</ref> As slaughter by-products, lambskin condoms are also not [[vegetarian]]. Pharmacist advice prepared by the ''[[Canadian Pharmaceutical Journal]]'' says that lambskin condoms "are generally not recommended" due to limited STI prevention.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ruddock |first=Brent |date=September 2004 |title=Condoms protect you: shield yourself from STIs |journal=Canadian Pharmaceutical Journal |volume=137 |issue=7 |pages=42 |id={{ProQuest|221125941}}}}</ref> An article in ''Adolescent Medicine'' advises that they "should be used only for pregnancy prevention".<ref name=":1" /> === Spermicide === Some latex condoms are lubricated at the manufacturer with a small amount of a [[nonoxynol-9]], a [[spermicide|spermicidal chemical]]. According to ''[[Consumer Reports]]'', condoms lubricated with spermicide have no additional benefit in preventing pregnancy, have a shorter shelf life, and may cause [[urinary tract infection]]s in women.<ref>{{cite web |title=Condoms: Extra protection |work=ConsumerReports.org |date=February 2005 |url=http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/cu-press-room/pressroom/archive/2005/02/eng0502tcv.htm?resultPageIndex=1&resultIndex=1&searchTerm=condom |access-date=26 July 2009}}{{dead link|date=July 2019|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> In contrast, application of separately packaged spermicide ''is'' believed to increase the contraceptive efficacy of condoms.<ref name="simultaneous" /> Nonoxynol-9 was once believed to offer additional protection against STIs (including HIV) but recent studies have shown that, with frequent use, nonoxynol-9 may increase the risk of HIV transmission.<ref>{{cite web |title=Nonoxynol-9 and the Risk of HIV Transmission |work=HIV/AIDS Epi Update |publisher=Health Canada, Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control |date=April 2003 |url=http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/epiu-aepi/hiv-vih/nonoxynol-eng.php |access-date=6 August 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090929172125/http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/epiu-aepi/hiv-vih/nonoxynol-eng.php |archive-date=29 September 2009}}</ref> The [[World Health Organization]] says that spermicidally lubricated condoms should no longer be promoted. However, it recommends using a [[nonoxynol-9]] lubricated condom over no condom at all.<ref>{{cite web |title=Nonoxynol-9 ineffective in preventing HIV infection |work=World Health Organization |year=2006 |url=https://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/notes/release55/en/index.html |access-date=26 July 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110321074537/http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/notes/release55/en/index.html |archive-date=21 March 2011}}</ref> {{as of|2005}}, nine condom manufacturers have stopped manufacturing condoms with nonoxynol-9 and [[Planned Parenthood]] has discontinued the distribution of condoms so lubricated.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Boonstra |first=Heather |title=Condoms, Contraceptives and Nonoxynol-9: Complex Issues Obscured by Ideology |journal=The Guttmacher Report on Public Policy |volume=8 |issue=2 |date=May 2005 |url=http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/tgr/08/2/gr080204.html |access-date=8 April 2007 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070420165133/http://guttmacher.org/pubs/tgr/08/2/gr080204.html |archive-date=20 April 2007}}</ref> === Ribbed and studded === [[File:Kondom - abgerollt - hängend.jpg|thumb|upright=0.15|A ribbed condom]] Textured condoms include studded and ribbed condoms which can provide extra sensations to both partners. The studs or ribs can be located on the inside, outside, or both; alternatively, they are located in specific sections to provide directed stimulation to either the [[G-spot]] or [[Frenulum of prepuce of penis|frenulum]]. Many textured condoms which advertise "mutual pleasure" also are bulb-shaped at the top, to provide extra stimulation to the penis.<ref name="about">{{cite web |title=Condom Types: A look at different condom styles |url=http://contraception.about.com/od/malecondom/tp/CondomTypes.htm |last=Stacey |first=Dawn |access-date=8 December 2008 |url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081219035952/http://contraception.about.com/od/malecondom/tp/CondomTypes.htm|archive-date=19 December 2008}}</ref> Some women experience irritation during [[vagina]]l intercourse with studded condoms. === Other === The [[anti-rape condom]] is another variation designed to be worn by women. It is designed to cause pain to the attacker, hopefully allowing the victim a chance to escape.<ref>{{cite web |title=Rape-aXe: Questions and answers |publisher=Rape-aXe |year=2006 |url=http://www.antirape.co.za/questions.htm |access-date=13 August 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090503104839/http://www.antirape.co.za/questions.htm |archive-date=3 May 2009}}</ref> A [[#Infertility treatment|collection condom]] is used to collect semen for fertility treatments or sperm analysis. These condoms are designed to maximize sperm life. In February 2022, the U.S. [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA) approved the first condoms specifically [[indicated]] to help reduce transmission of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) during anal intercourse.<ref>{{citation-attribution|1={{cite press release | title=FDA Permits Marketing of First Condom Specifically Indicated for Anal Intercourse | website=U.S. [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA) | date=23 February 2022 | url=https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-permits-marketing-first-condom-specifically-indicated-anal-intercourse | access-date=27 February 2022 | archive-date=24 February 2022 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220224220856/https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-permits-marketing-first-condom-specifically-indicated-anal-intercourse | url-status=live }} }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Condom
(section)
Add topic