Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Chesapeake and Ohio Canal
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Receivership=== Following the disastrous flood of 1889, the canal company entered receivership with court-appointed trustees. The trustees were given the right to repair and operate the canal under continued court oversight. The trustees represented the majority owners of the C&O Canal Company bonds issued in 1844. While the B&O owned the majority of the 1878 bonds, the B&O did not own a majority of the 1844 bonds as of 1890. However, by 1903, the B&O had acquired sufficient bonds to become "a majority holder",<ref>{{cite news |title=Local Financial News |url=https://www.newspapers.com/image/146397543/?terms=%22Chesapeake%20and%20Ohio%20Canal%22&match=1 |access-date=30 July 2021 |work=Evening Star, Washington, D.C. |issue=15716 |date=July 9, 1903 |page=2}}</ref> the reported reason being "to secure for the Wabash [railroad] system a foothold on the Atlantic seaboard" which had only been incorporated in February 1903. Over the next decade, and particularly after 1902, boats on the canal shifted from independent operators to company-owned craft. Boats with colorful names (''Bertha M. Young'' or ''Lezen Ragan'') gave way to numbered craft ("Canal Towage Company" with a number) run by a schedule.<ref>[[#Unrau|Unrau]] p. 814-815</ref> Despite the B&O's status as a majority bondholder, the B&O can not be said to have ever owned the C&O. This did not stop the B&O from trying to sell it. In 1936, the B&O attempted to sell part of the canal from Point of Rocks to the District line. This was blocked by the courts which had continued to oversee the C&O trustees with the court saying "It is of course well known that the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company is not the owner of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal." At that time, the court also stated that the canal could not be sold in pieces but only in its entirety. <ref>{{cite court |litigants=RE: THE TITLE TO C&O CANAL FROM THE DISTRICT TO POINT OF ROCKS On The Question Of Whether The United States Can Acquire By Purchase A Valid Title To The Portion Of The Chesapeake And Ohio Canal Extending From Washington To Point Of Rocks, Md. |reporter=Mr. Assistant Attorney General Blair |date=November 14, 1936}}</ref> In 1938, new trustees were appointed by the court to handle the sale under the court's continued oversight.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Chesapeake and Ohio Canal
(section)
Add topic