Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
William James
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Mysticism == William James devoted much of his career to the psychological investigation of mysticism. A significant influence on this undertaking was his own mystical experience under the influence of nitrous oxide. Inspired by a report by Benjamin Paul Blood in 1874,<ref>{{cite book |last=Blood |first=Benjamin Paul |date=1874 |title=The anaesthetic revelation and the gist of philosophy |publisher=Books on Demand|oclc= 11479610}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=James |first1=William |title=Review of 'The Anaesthetic Revelation and the Gist of Philosophy' |journal=Atlantic Monthly |date=Nov 1874 |volume=33 |issue=205 |pages=627β628}}</ref> James experimented with inhaled nitrous oxide, upon which he experienced a "tremendously exciting sense of an intense metaphysical illumination" in which "every opposition ... vanished in a higher unity" and "the ego and its objects ... are one."<ref>{{cite book |last=James |first=William |date=1896 |title=On some Hegelisms. In W. James, ''The will to believe and other essays in popular philosophy'' |publisher=Longmans, Green, & Co. |pages=297β298}}</ref> For so ardent an anti-Hegelian, this was a particularly novel and confusing experience for James. He was powerfully affected by the event and struggled greatly to interpret it. His journey of self discovery instigated by the experience is largely what inspired his later in-depth investigations of mysticism. William James provided a description of mystical experience in his famous collection of lectures published in 1902 as ''The Varieties of Religious Experience''.<ref>{{cite book |last=James |first=William |date=1902 |title=The Varieties of Religious Experience |publisher=The Library of America |pages=379β429|isbn=978-1-59853-062-9}}</ref> He posits four criteria as "sufficient to mark out a group of states of consciousness" which may be called the "mystical group." These criteria are as follows: * Ineffability β no adequate report of the contents of the experience can be given by words. This was the "handiest" of descriptors for James, and illustrates the necessity of direct, first-hand experience to actually understand a mystical state of consciousness. * Noetic quality β "...mystical states seem to those who experience them to be also states of knowledge." Mystical consciousness generates a feeling of insight into truths inaccessible to ordinary reasoning. These intuitions or insights are often felt as authoritative both during and after they are experienced, but are necessarily confined by the first criterion of ineffability, and are thus inexpressible in words.<ref>{{cite book |last=James |first=William |date=1902 |title=The Varieties of Religious Experience |publisher=The Library of America |pages=380β381|isbn=978-1-59853-062-9}}</ref> * Transiency β the mystical state is unable to be sustained for long periods of time. They are, however, recognizable upon re-experience, and can be further developed over multiple occasions. * Passivity β a feeling of suspension of control of one's personal will, occasionally as if grasped by a superior power. For James, the first two attributes, ineffability and the noetic quality, "will entitle any state to be called mystical, in the sense in which I use the word." The qualities of transiency and passivity are "less sharply marked, but are usually found."<ref>{{cite book |last=James |first=William |date=1902 |title=The Varieties of Religious Experience |publisher=The Library of America |pages=380β382 |isbn=978-1-59853-062-9}}</ref> He uses a number of historical examples to illustrate the presence of these attributes in geographically and temporally disparate instances, concluding that the mystical experience "''is on the whole pantheistic and optimistic, or at least the opposite of pessimistic. It is anti-naturalistic, and harmonizes best with twice-bornness and so-called other-worldly states of mind''" (original italics).<ref>{{cite book |last=James |first=William |date=1902 |title=The Varieties of Religious Experience |publisher=The Library of America |pages=422 |isbn=978-1-59853-062-9}}</ref> In line with his pragmatism, he asserted that the epistemological authority of mystical consciousness for the individual who experiences it is may be rightfully justified, but that others are under no obligation to accept that authority uncritically. Importantly, however, the mere existence of mystical states necessarily indicates an incompleteness in the epistemological authority of the non-mystical.<ref>{{cite book |last=James |first=William |date=1902 |title=The Varieties of Religious Experience |publisher=The Library of America |pages=427β429 |isbn=978-1-59853-062-9}}</ref> He would continue to advocate for the acceptance of mystical states as a fruitful subject of psychological research and source of knowledge. In his book ''The Pluralistic Universe'' (1909), he would expand upon his notion of "radical empiricism" in arguing for the possible association of empiricism and religion in the study of human spirituality <ref>{{cite book |last=James |first=William |date=1977 |title=The Pluralistic Universe |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn= 9780674673915}}</ref> In viewing mysticism from a psychological perspective, he acknowledged that the limits of our being extend far beyond what is ordinarily accessible by our sense perception, and that our finite beings are affected by unconscious forces. "But that which produces effects within another reality must be termed a reality itself, so I feel as if we had no philosophic excuse for calling the unseen or mystical world unreal."<ref>{{cite book |last=James |first=William |date=1902 |title=The Varieties of Religious Experience |publisher=The Library of America |page=516 |isbn=978-1-59853-062-9}}</ref> James viewed mysticism as the most foundational aspect of religion. While he grants that religious experience reveals the possibility of union with something greater than oneself, he clarifies that mysticism (and philosophy) identify that something as an "all inclusive soul of the world" that he does not deem wholly necessary for a practical and fulfilling religious life. As always, James is averse to any dogmatic or absolutist doctrines, within religion and without, and thus values mysticism as a unique method of personal acquaintance with a larger reality.<ref>{{cite book |last=James |first=William |date=1902 |title=The Varieties of Religious Experience |publisher=The Library of America |pages=525β527 |isbn=978-1-59853-062-9}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
William James
(section)
Add topic