Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Protein primary structure
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==History== The proposal that proteins were linear chains of Ξ±-amino acids was made nearly simultaneously by two scientists at the same conference in 1902, the 74th meeting of the Society of German Scientists and Physicians, held in Karlsbad. [[Franz Hofmeister]] made the proposal in the morning, based on his observations of the biuret reaction in proteins. Hofmeister was followed a few hours later by [[Hermann Emil Fischer|Emil Fischer]], who had amassed a wealth of chemical details supporting the peptide-bond model. For completeness, the proposal that proteins contained amide linkages was made as early as 1882 by the French chemist E. Grimaux.<ref name="history">{{cite journal |author=Fruton JS |title=Early theories of protein structure |journal=Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. |volume=325 |pages=xiv, 1β18 |date=May 1979 |issue=1 |pmid=378063 |doi=10.1111/j.1749-6632.1979.tb14125.x |bibcode=1979NYASA.325....1F |s2cid=39125170 }}</ref> Despite these data and later evidence that proteolytically digested proteins yielded only oligopeptides, the idea that proteins were linear, unbranched polymers of amino acids was not accepted immediately. Some scientists such as [[William Astbury]] doubted that covalent bonds were strong enough to hold such long molecules together; they feared that thermal agitations would shake such long molecules asunder. [[Hermann Staudinger]] faced similar prejudices in the 1920s when he argued that [[rubber]] was composed of [[macromolecule]]s.<ref name="history"/> Thus, several alternative hypotheses arose. The '''colloidal protein hypothesis''' stated that proteins were colloidal assemblies of smaller molecules. This hypothesis was disproved in the 1920s by ultracentrifugation measurements by [[Theodor Svedberg]] that showed that proteins had a well-defined, reproducible molecular weight and by electrophoretic measurements by [[Arne Tiselius]] that indicated that proteins were single molecules. A second hypothesis, the '''[[cyclol]] hypothesis''' advanced by [[Dorothy Wrinch]], proposed that the linear polypeptide underwent a chemical cyclol rearrangement C=O + HN <math>\rightarrow</math> C(OH)-N that crosslinked its backbone amide groups, forming a two-dimensional ''fabric''. Other primary structures of proteins were proposed by various researchers, such as the '''diketopiperazine model''' of [[Emil Abderhalden]] and the '''pyrrol/piperidine model''' of Troensegaard in 1942. Although never given much credence, these alternative models were finally disproved when [[Frederick Sanger]] successfully sequenced [[insulin]]{{when|date=May 2019}} and by the crystallographic determination of myoglobin and hemoglobin by [[Max Perutz]] and [[John Kendrew]]{{when|date=May 2019}}.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Protein primary structure
(section)
Add topic