Editing Power (social and political) (section)

=== Cultural hegemony ===
In the [[Marxism|Marxist]] tradition, the [[Italy|Italian]] writer [[Antonio Gramsci]] elaborated on the role of [[ideology]] in creating a [[cultural hegemony]], which becomes a means of bolstering the power of [[capitalism]] and of the [[nation-state]]. Drawing on [[Niccolò Machiavelli]] in ''[[The Prince]]'' and trying to understand why there had been no [[Communist]] revolution in [[Western Europe]] while it was claimed there had been one in [[Russia]], Gramsci conceptualised this hegemony as a [[centaur]], consisting of two halves. The back end, the beast, represented the more classic material image of power: power through coercion, through brute force, be it physical or economic. But the capitalist hegemony, he argued, depended even more strongly on the front end, the human face, which projected power through 'consent'. In Russia, this power was lacking, allowing for a revolution. However, in Western Europe, specifically in [[Italy]], capitalism had succeeded in exercising ''consensual'' power, convincing the working classes that their interests were the same as those of capitalists. In this way, a revolution had been avoided.

While Gramsci stresses the significance of ideology in power structures, Marxist-feminist writers such as Michele Barrett stress the role of ideologies in extolling the virtues of family life. The classic argument to illustrate this point of view is the use of women as a '[[reserve army of labour]]'. In wartime, it is accepted that women perform masculine tasks, while after the war, the roles are easily reversed. Therefore, according to Barrett, the destruction of capitalist economic relations is necessary but not sufficient for the liberation of women.<ref>Pip Jones, ''Introducing Social Theory'', Polity Press, Cambridge, 2008, p. 93.</ref>