Editing Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949 (section)

==Use of the Parliament Acts==
The original form of the 1911 Act was used three times.<ref name="pnote"/> These were:
# [[Government of Ireland Act 1914]], which would have established a [[Home Rule]] government in Ireland; its implementation was blocked due to the First World War.
# [[Welsh Church Act 1914]], under which the Welsh part of the [[Church of England]] was [[disestablishment|disestablished]] in 1920, becoming the [[Church in Wales]].
# [[Parliament Act 1949]], which amended the Parliament Act 1911 (discussed above).

The amended form of the 1911 Act has been used four times.<ref name="pnote"/> These were:
# [[War Crimes Act 1991]], which extended jurisdiction of UK courts to acts committed on behalf of [[Nazi Germany]] during the Second World War (the only time – to date – that the Parliament Acts have been used by a [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative]] government).
# [[European Parliamentary Elections Act 1999]], which changed the system of elections to the [[European Parliament]] from [[first past the post]] to a form of [[proportional representation]].
# [[Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 2000]], which equalised the [[age of consent]] for male [[homosexual]] sexual activities with that for [[heterosexual]] and female homosexual sexual activities at 16.
# [[Hunting Act 2004]], which prohibited [[hare coursing]] and (subject to some exceptions) all [[hunting]] of wild [[mammal]]s (particularly [[fox hunting|foxes]]) with dogs after early 2005.

The Welsh Church Act and the Government of Ireland Act were both given royal assent<ref>[https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1914/sep/18/royal-assent#S5CV0066P0_19140918_HOC_10 Hansard] 18 September 1914</ref> on the same day as the [[Suspensory Act 1914]], which meant that neither would come into force until after the War.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Jalland|first1=Patricia|author-link=Pat Jalland|last2=Stubbs|first2=John|date=October 1981|title=The Irish Question after the Outbreak of War in 1914: Some Unfinished Party Business|journal=The English Historical Review|volume=96|issue=381|pages=778–807|doi=10.1093/ehr/xcvi.ccclxxxi.778|jstor=569840}}</ref>

After the Labour government came to power in 1997, there was repeated speculation that it would rely on the Parliament Acts to reverse a check from the Lords, but it did not prove necessary. The Parliament Acts were not required to enact, for example, the [[Criminal Justice (Mode of Trial) (No 2) Bill]] in 2000<ref name="pnote"/> (which originally proposed to give [[magistrate]]s, not defendants, the choice of where an "[[Hybrid offence|either way]]" offence would be tried) because the government abandoned the bill after a [[wrecking amendment]] in the House of Lords.{{Citation needed|date=July 2011}} The Parliament Act was threatened to be used to get the [[Identity Cards Act 2006]] passed through the Lords. This was backed up by a threat of an immediate introduction of a compulsory ID Card scheme.{{Citation needed|date=July 2011}} The Lords had no option but to accept a compromise of a delay in the introduction of the scheme. The Parliament Acts cannot be used to force through legislation that originated in the House of Lords, so they could not have been used to enact the [[Civil Partnerships Act 2004]] or the [[Constitutional Reform Act 2005]].

The first three measures for which the Act has been used since 1949 were not mentioned in manifestos, and hence in trying to veto them the Lords were not breaking the [[Salisbury convention]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldconst/141/141.pdf|title=Constitutional aspects of the challenge to the Hunting Act 2004|last=Brazier|first=Rodney|date=15 March 2006|website = www.publications.parliament.uk|publisher=London : The Stationery Office Limited|access-date=27 December 2016}}</ref> The Hunting Bill was mentioned in the [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour Party]] manifesto for the [[2001 United Kingdom general election|2001 general election]], so, depending upon how the convention is interpreted, the attempt to block it could be taken as a breach. However, as conventions are merely convention and not law, the House of Lords would not be taking illegal action if they were to act otherwise.

The [[Government of Ireland Act 1914]] was repealed in entirety by the [[Government of Ireland Act 1920]], the [[European Parliamentary Elections Act 1999]] was repealed in entirety by the [[European Parliamentary Elections Act 2002]] and most provisions of the [[Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 2000]] were repealed by the [[Sexual Offences Act 2003]]. While the [[War Crimes Act 1991]] remains in force, to date only [[Anthony Sawoniuk]] has been convicted under it.{{Citation needed|date=July 2011}}

The threat of the Parliament Acts has been employed by several British governments to force the Lords to accept its legislation. In at least three cases, the procedure authorised by the Parliament Act 1911, or by the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949, was started, but the legislation was approved by the House of Lords as a result of the government making concessions.<ref name="pnote"/> These were:
# [[Temperance (Scotland) Act 1913]], which allowed the voters in a district to hold a poll to vote on whether their district went "[[Prohibition|dry]]" or remained "wet".
# [[Trade Union and Labour Relations (Amendment) Act 1976]], which amended the [[Trade Union and Labour Relations Act 1974]] to reverse changes made to that Act as it passed through Parliament.
# [[Aircraft and Shipbuilding Industries Act 1977]], which [[nationalised]] large parts of the UK aerospace and shipbuilding industries and established two corporations, [[British Aerospace]] and [[British Shipbuilders]].