Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Omniscience
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Omniscience and the privacy of conscious experience== Some philosophers, such as [[Patrick Grim]], [[Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski|Linda Zagzebski]], Stephan Torre, and William Mander have discussed the issue of whether the apparent exclusively first-person nature of conscious experience is compatible with God's omniscience. There is a strong sense in which conscious experience is private, meaning that no outside observer can gain knowledge of what it is like to be me ''as me''. If a subject cannot know what it is like to be another subject in an objective manner, the question is whether that limitation applies to God as well. If it does, then God cannot be said to be omniscient since there is then a form of knowledge that God lacks access to. The philosopher Patrick Grim<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Grim|first=Patrick|date=1985|title=Against omniscience: The case from essential indexicals|journal=NoΓ»s|volume=19|issue=2|pages=151β180|jstor=2214928|doi=10.2307/2214928|url=https://philarchive.org/rec/GRIAOT }}</ref> most notably raised this issue. Linda Zagzebski<ref>{{Cite book|title=Omnisubjectivity : a defense of a divine attribute|author=Zagzebski, Linda Trinkaus|isbn=9780874621839|location=Milwaukee, Wisconsin|oclc=825106425|year = 2013}}</ref> argued against this by introducing the notion of ''perfect empathy'', a proposed relation that God can have to subjects that would allow God to have perfect knowledge of their conscious experience. William Mander<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Mander|first=William|date=2000|title=Does God know what it is like to be me?|journal=Heythrop Journal|volume=43|issue=4|pages=430β443|doi=10.1111/1468-2265.00203}}</ref> argued that God can only have such knowledge if our experiences are part of God's broader experience. Stephan Torre<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Torre|first=Stephan|date=2006|title=De Se Knowledge and the Possibility of an Omniscient Being|journal=Faith and Philosophy|volume=23|issue=2|pages=191β200|doi=10.5840/faithphil200623215|url=https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy/vol23/iss2/5}}</ref> claimed that God can have such knowledge if self-knowledge involves the ascription of properties, either to oneself or to others.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Omniscience
(section)
Add topic