Editing Nebuchadnezzar II (section)

=== Later military campaigns ===
{{See also|Siege of Tyre (586–573 BC)}}
[[File:Siege of Tyre by Nebuchadnezzar II.jpg|alt=Artwork depicting Nebuchadnezzar's siege of Tyre|thumb|''Tyre besieged by Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon'', by Stanley Llewellyn Wood, 1915]]
It is possible that the Egyptians took advantage of the Babylonians being preoccupied with besieging Jerusalem. Herodotus describes Pharaoh Apries as campaigning in the Levant, taking the city of Sidon and fighting the Tyrians, which indicates a renewed Egyptian invasion of the Levant.{{Sfn|Elayi|2018|p=195}} Apries is unlikely to have been as successful as Herodotus describes, given that it is unclear how the Egyptian navy would have defeated the superior navies of the Phoenician cities, and even if some cities had been taken, they must have shortly thereafter fallen into Babylonian hands again.{{Sfn|Elayi|2018|p=196}} Tyre had rebelled against Nebuchadnezzar at around the same time as Judah, and Nebuchadnezzar moved to retake the city after his successful subduing of the Jews.{{Sfn|Elayi|2018|p=196}}

The biblical [[Book of Ezekiel]] describes Tyre in 571 BC as if it had been recently captured by the Babylonian army.{{Sfn|Ephʿal|2003|p=184}} The supposed length of the siege, 13 years,{{Sfn|Ephʿal|2003|p=186}} is only given by Flavius Josephus, and is subject to debate among modern scholars.{{Sfn|Beaulieu|2018|p=229}} Josephus's account of Nebuchadnezzar's reign is obviously not entirely historic, as he describes Nebuchadnezzar as, five years after the destruction of Jerusalem, invading Egypt, capturing the Pharaoh and appointing another Pharaoh in his place.{{Sfn|Ephʿal|2003|p=183}} A stele from [[Tahpanhes]] uncovered in 2011 records that Nebuchadnezzar attempted to invade Egypt in 582 BC, although Apries' forces managed to repel the invasion.{{Sfn|Kahn|2018|pp=72–73}} 

Josephus states that Nebuchadnezzar besieged Tyre in the seventh year of "his" reign, though it is unclear whether "his" in this context refers to Nebuchadnezzar or to Ithobaal III of Tyre. If it refers to Nebuchadnezzar, a siege begun in 598 BC and lasting for thirteen years, later simultaneously with the siege of Jerusalem, is unlikely to have gone unmentioned in Babylonian records. If the seventh year of Ithobaal is intended, the beginning of the siege may conjecturally be placed after Jerusalem's fall. If the siege lasting 13 years is taken at face value, the siege would then not have ended before 573 or 572 BC.{{Sfn|Ephʿal|2003|p=186}} The supposed length of the siege can be ascribed to the difficulty in besieging the city: Tyre was located on an island 800 metres from the coast, and could not be taken without naval support. Though the city withstood numerous sieges, it would not be captured until [[Alexander the Great]]'s siege in 332 BC.{{Sfn|Ephʿal|2003|p=187}}

In the end, the siege was resolved without a need of battle and did not result in the Tyre being conquered.{{Sfn|Beaulieu|2018|p=229}}{{Sfn|Ephʿal|2003|p=187}} It seems Tyre's king and Nebuchadnezzar came to an agreement for Tyre to continue to be ruled by vassal kings, though probably under heavier Babylonian control than before. Documents from Tyre near the end of Nebuchadnezzar's reign demonstrate that the city had become a centre for Babylonian military affairs in the region.{{Sfn|Beaulieu|2018|p=229}} According to later Jewish tradition, it is possible that Ithobaal III was deposed and taken as a prisoner to Babylon, with another king, Baal II, proclaimed by Nebuchadnezzar in his place.{{Sfn|Elayi|2018|p=200}}

It is possible that Nebuchadnezzar campaigned against Egypt in 568 BC,{{Sfn|Ephʿal|2003|p=|pp=187–188}}{{Sfn|Elayi|2018|p=201}} given that a fragmentary Babylonian inscription, given the modern designation BM 33041, from that year records the word "Egypt" as well as possibly traces of the name "Amasis" (the name of the then incumbent Pharaoh, [[Amasis II]], {{Reign}}570–526 BC). A stele of Amasis, also fragmentary, may also describe a combined naval and land attack by the Babylonians. Recent evidence suggests that the Babylonians were initially successful during the invasion and gained a foothold in Egypt, but they were repelled by Amasis' forces.{{Sfn|Kahn|2018|pp=77}} If Nebuchadnezzar did campaign against Egypt again, he was unsuccessful again, given that Egypt did not come under Babylonian rule.{{Sfn|Ephʿal|2003|p=|pp=187–188}}

Nebuchadnezzar's campaigns in the Levant, most notably those directed towards Jerusalem and Tyre, completed the Neo-Babylonian Empire's transformation from a [[rump state]] of the Neo-Assyrian Empire to the new dominant power of the ancient Near East.{{Sfn|Beaulieu|2018|p=229}} Still, Nebuchadnezzar's military accomplishments can be questioned,{{Sfn|Elayi|2018|p=190}} given that the borders of his empire, by the end of his reign, had not noticeably increased in size and that he had not managed to conquer Egypt. Even after a reign of several decades, Nebuchadnezzar's greatest victory remained his victory over the Egyptians at Carchemish in 605 BC, before he even became king.{{Sfn|Ephʿal|2003|p=189}}