Editing Jameson Raid (section)

== Modern reactions ==
To this day, Jameson's involvement in the Jameson Raid remains something of an enigma, being somewhat out-of-character with his prior history, the rest of his life and successful later political career. In 2002, The [[Van Riebeeck Society]] published Sir [[Graham Bower]]'s ''Secret History of the Jameson Raid and the South African Crisis, 1895–1902'' (edited by Deryck Schreuder and Jeffrey Butler, Van Riebeeck Society, Cape Town, Second Series No. 33), adding to growing historical evidence that the imprisonment and judgement upon the Raiders at the time of their trial was unjust,<ref name="Bower2002" /> in view of what has appeared, in later historical analysis, to have been the calculated political manoeuvres by [[Joseph Chamberlain]] and his staff to hide his own involvement and knowledge of the Raid.

In a 2004 review of Sir Graham Bower's account, Alan Cousins commented that "A number of major themes and concerns emerge" from Bower's history, "perhaps the most poignant being Bower’s accounts of his being made a scapegoat in the aftermath of the raid: 'since a scapegoat was wanted I was willing to serve my country in that capacity'."{{citation needed|date=January 2015}}<ref name="Cousins2006">{{Cite journal | title = The Jameson Raid: Politicians, Plots and Scapegoats in South Africa | last = Cousins | first = Alan | journal = Historian | date =2006  | issue=90|pages=20–27 | url = https://www.proquest.com/openview/9ad3431077f81a3ab1c3fe39684467da/ }}</ref>

Cousins writes of Bower that:
{{Blockquote|a very clear sense of his rigid code of honour is plain, and a conviction that not only unity, peace and happiness in South Africa, but also the peace of Europe would be endangered if he told the truth. He believed that, as he had given [[Cecil Rhodes|Rhodes]] his word not to divulge certain private conversations, he had to abide by that, while at the same time he was convinced that it would be very damaging to Britain if he said anything to the parliamentary committee to show the close involvement of Sir Hercules Robinson and Joseph Chamberlain in their disreputable encouragement of those plotting an uprising in Johannesburg.}}

Finally, Cousins states that
{{Blockquote|in his reflections, Bower has a particularly damning judgement on Chamberlain, whom he accuses of 'brazen lying' to parliament, and of what amounted to forgery in the documents made public for the inquiry. In the report of the committee, Bower was found culpable of complicity, while no blame was attached to Joseph Chamberlain or Robinson. His name was never cleared during his lifetime, and Bower was never reinstated to what he believed should be his proper position in the colonial service: he was, in effect, demoted to the post of Colonial Secretary in [[Mauritius]]. The bitterness and sense of betrayal he felt come through very clearly in his comments.}}