Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Interactive proof system
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== PCP === {{main|Probabilistically checkable proof}} While the designers of '''IP''' considered generalizations of Babai's interactive proof systems, others considered restrictions. A very useful interactive proof system is '''PCP'''(''f''(''n''), ''g''(''n'')), which is a restriction of '''MA''' where Arthur can only use ''f''(''n'') random bits and can only examine ''g''(''n'') bits of the proof certificate sent by Merlin (essentially using [[random access]]). There are a number of easy-to-prove results about various '''PCP''' classes. {{tmath|1=\mathsf{PCP}(0,\mathsf{poly})}}, the class of polynomial-time machines with no randomness but access to a certificate, is just '''NP'''. {{tmath|1=\mathsf{PCP}(\mathsf{poly},0)}}, the class of polynomial-time machines with access to polynomially many random bits is '''co-[[RP (complexity)|RP]]'''. Arora and Safra's first major result was that {{tmath|1= \mathsf{PCP}(\log, \log) = \mathsf{NP} }}; put another way, if the verifier in the '''NP''' protocol is constrained to choose only {{tmath|O(\log n)}} bits of the proof certificate to look at, this won't make any difference as long as it has {{tmath|O(\log n)}} random bits to use.<ref>Sanjeev Arora and [[Shmuel Safra]]. [http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/arora92probabilistic.html Probabilistic Checking of Proofs: A New Characterization of NP]. ''Journal of the ACM'', volume 45, issue 1, pp. 70β122. January 1998.</ref> Furthermore, the [[PCP theorem]] asserts that the number of proof accesses can be brought all the way down to a constant. That is, {{tmath|1=\mathsf{NP} = \mathsf{PCP}(\log, O(1))}}.<ref>Sanjeev Arora, C. Lund, R. Motwani, M. Sudan, and M. Szegedy. [http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/376426.html Proof Verification and the Hardness of Approximation Problems]. Proceedings of the 33rd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 13β22. 1992.</ref> They used this valuable characterization of '''NP''' to prove that [[approximation algorithm]]s do not exist for the optimization versions of certain [[NP-complete]] problems unless [[P = NP]]. Such problems are now studied in the field known as [[hardness of approximation]].
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Interactive proof system
(section)
Add topic