Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Igbo language
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Grammatical relations == Igbo does not mark overt case distinctions on nominal constituents and conveys grammatical relations only through [[word order]]. The typical Igbo sentence displays subject-verb-object (SVO) ordering, where the subject is understood as the sole argument of an intransitive verb or the agent-like (external) argument of a transitive verb. Igbo thus exhibits [[Nominative–accusative language|accusative]] [[Morphosyntactic alignment|alignment]]. It has been proposed, with reservations, that some Igbo verbs display ergativity on some level, as in the following two examples:<ref name=":0" /> {{interlinear|number=(4) |Nnukwu mmīri nà-ezò n'iro. |big water AUX-fall PREP-outside |'Heavy rain is falling outside.'}} {{interlinear|number=(5) |Ọ nà-ezò nnukwu mmīri n'iro. |it AUX-fall big water PREP-outside |'Heavy rain is falling outside.'}} In (4), the verb has a single argument, ''nnukwu mmīri'', which appears in subject position, and in the transitive sentence (5), that same argument appears in the object position, even though the two are semantically identical. On this basis, authors such as Emenanjuo (2015) have posited that this argument is an absolutive and that Igbo therefore contains some degree of ergativity. However, others disagree, arguing that the relevant category is not alignment but underlying argument structure; under this hypothesis, (4) and (5) differ only in the application of a transformation and can be accounted for entirely by the [[Unaccusative verb|unaccusative]] hypothesis and the [[Extended Projection Principle]];<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|last=Nwachukwu|first=P. Akujuoobi |date=September 1987 |title=The Argument Structure of Igbo Verbs |journal=Lexicon Project Working Papers |volume=18 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231221030515/https://manfredi.mayfirst.org/Nwachukwu1987MIT.pdf |archive-date=2023-12-21 |url=https://manfredi.mayfirst.org/Nwachukwu1987MIT.pdf}}</ref> the nominal argument is generated in object position, and either it is raised to the subject position, as in (4), or the subject position is filled with a [[pleonastic pronoun]], as in (5).
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Igbo language
(section)
Add topic