Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Derek Parfit
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Non-identity problem === The [[non-identity problem]] arises from the observation that actions taken today can fundamentally alter which future people come into existence. In chapter 16 of ''Reasons and Persons'', Parfit posits that one's existence is intimately related to the time and conditions of one's conception.<ref name=":4" />{{Rp|351}} He calls this "The Time-Dependence Claim": "If any particular person had not been conceived when he was in fact conceived, it is in fact true that he would never have existed".<ref name=":4" />{{Rp|351}} Like the [[butterfly effect]] in [[chaos theory]], small changes in initial conditions can have profound downstream effects on human reproduction. Actions may not just affect the welfare of future individuals, but also cause different individuals to be born.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Nonidentity Problem |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nonidentity-problem/ |website=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy}}</ref> If the moral ramifications of potential policies are considered in [[Person-affecting view|person-affecting]] terms, there is no reason to prefer a sound policy over an unsound one, provided that its effects are not felt by the next few generations.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2017-06-12 |title=Should we take ethical account of people who do not yet exist? |url=https://aeon.co/essays/should-we-take-ethical-account-of-people-who-do-not-yet-exist |access-date=2025-01-26 |website=Aeon |language=en}}</ref> Parfit eventually became convinced that personal identity is irrelevant to ethics.<ref name=":6">{{Cite web |last=Matthews |first=Dylan |date=2017-01-03 |title=The whole philosophy community is mourning Derek Parfit. Hereโs why he mattered. |url=https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2017/1/3/14148208/derek-parfit-rip-obit |access-date=2025-01-26 |website=Vox |language=en-US}}</ref> He wrote about an article in ''[[The Times]]'' in which a politician praised a recent decline in teenage pregnancy. A man wrote a letter saying he had had a teenage mother and, although the early years had been hard, he now had a life thoroughly worth living. The man asked whether the politician was suggesting it would have been better if he had never been born. Parfit said the man would waive the right to have such-and-such level of a good start in life merely to exist. He wrote, "The objection must be that if she had waited, she could have given to some other child a better start in life."<ref>[https://rintintin.colorado.edu/~vancecd/phil308/Parfit1.pdf โThe Non-Identity Problem,โ] from the book ''Reasons and Persons'', Derek Parfit, please see page 11 in this excerpt.</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Derek Parfit
(section)
Add topic