Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Denotational semantics
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Abstraction== It is often considered important to connect denotational semantics with [[operational semantics]]. This is especially important when the denotational semantics is rather mathematical and abstract, and the operational semantics is more concrete or closer to the computational intuitions. The following properties of a denotational semantics are often of interest. #'''Syntax independence''': The denotations of programs should not involve the syntax of the source language. #'''Adequacy (or soundness)''': All [[observational equivalence|observably distinct]] programs have distinct denotations; #'''Full abstraction''': All observationally equivalent programs have equal denotations. For semantics in the traditional style, adequacy and full abstraction may be understood roughly as the requirement that "operational equivalence coincides with denotational equality". For denotational semantics in more intensional models, such as the [[actor model]] and [[process calculi]], there are different notions of equivalence within each model, and so the concepts of adequacy and of full abstraction are a matter of debate, and harder to pin down. Also the mathematical structure of operational semantics and denotational semantics can become very close. Additional desirable properties we may wish to hold between operational and denotational semantics are: #'''Constructivism''': [[Constructivism (mathematics)|Constructivism]] is concerned with whether domain elements can be shown to exist by constructive methods. #'''Independence of denotational and operational semantics''': The denotational semantics should be formalized using mathematical structures that are independent of the operational semantics of a programming language; However, the underlying concepts can be closely related. See the section on [[Denotational semantics#Compositionality|Compositionality]] below. #'''Full completeness''' or '''definability''': Every morphism of the semantic model should be the denotation of a program.<ref>{{cite journal | last = Curien | first = Pierre-Louis | title = Definability and Full Abstraction | journal = Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science | volume = 172 | pages = 301β310 | doi = 10.1016/j.entcs.2007.02.011 | year = 2007 | doi-access = free }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Denotational semantics
(section)
Add topic