Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
David Brooks (commentator)
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Books=== In reviewing ''On Paradise Drive'' (2004), [[Michael Kinsley]] described Brooks' "sociological method" as having "four components: fearless generalizing, clever coinage, jokes and shopping lists." Taking umbrage with the first of these, Kinsley states, "Brooks does not let the sociology get in the way of the shtick, and he wields a mean shoehorn when he needs the theory to fit the joke".<ref name = Kinsley>{{cite news|last1=Kinsley|first1=Michael|title=Suburban Thrall|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/23/books/suburban-thrall.html|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|location=New York City|date=May 23, 2004|access-date=November 14, 2014}}</ref> This followed the 2004 ''[[Philadelphia magazine|Philadelphia]]'' magazine fact-checking of ''Bobos in Paradise'' by [[Sasha Issenberg]] that concluded many of its comments about [[Middle America (United States)|middle America]] were misleading or untrue.<ref>{{cite magazine|last1=Issenberg|first1=Sasha|authorlink=Sasha Issenberg |title=Boo-Boos in Paradise|url=https://www.phillymag.com/news/2004/04/01/david-brooks-booboos-in-paradise/|magazine=[[Philadelphia (magazine)|Philadelphia]]|date=April 1, 2004|access-date=November 14, 2014}}</ref> Kinsley reported that "Brooks defend[ed] his generalizations as poetic hyperbole".<ref name = Kinsley/> Issenberg likewise noted that Brooks insisted that the book was not intended to be factual but rather to report impressions of what he believed an area to be like: "He laughed" that the book was "'partially tongue-in-cheek'". Issenberg continues, "I went through some of the other instances where he made declarations that appeared insupportable. He accused me of being 'too pedantic,' of 'taking all of this too literally,' of 'taking a joke and distorting it.' 'That's totally unethical', he said." <!--UNCLEAR AS TO WHICH ARTICLE, BROOKS ORIGINAL OR ISSENBERG, THAT THIS STATEMENT ADDRESSES: Brooks later said of the Issenberg the article made him feel that "I ''suck''...I can't remember what I said but my mother told me I was extremely stupid."--><ref name="Beam 2010" /> In 2015, David Zweig expressed the opinion in a ''[[Salon (website)|Salon]]'' piece that Brooks had gotten "nearly every detail" wrong about a poll of high school students in his recent, ''[[The Road to Character]]''.<ref name=Zweig150615>{{cite web| last1=Zweig|first1=David|date=June 15, 2015|title=The Facts vs. David Brooks: Startling Inaccuracies Raise Questions About His Latest Book | work = [[Salon.com]] | url=http://www.salon.com/2015/06/15/the_facts_vs_david_brooks_startling_inaccuracies_raise_questions_about_his_latest_book/ | access-date=August 15, 2015 }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
David Brooks (commentator)
(section)
Add topic