Editing Telecommunications in Sweden (section)

== Telecommunications ==
Sweden [[Liberalization|liberalized]] its [[telecommunications]] industry starting in 1980s and being formally liberalized in 1993.<ref name="tele">Swedish Economic Policy Review 9 (2002) 133-161. ''Telecommunications liberlaisation in Sweden: Is "intermediate regulation viable?''. Lars Hultkrantz. 2002. Available online in [http://www.ekonomiskaradet.se/Panda_ekonomiska/Data/Documents/sepr2002/Hultkrantz_9_2.pdf pdf format] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928094134/http://www.ekonomiskaradet.se/Panda_ekonomiska/Data/Documents/sepr2002/Hultkrantz_9_2.pdf |date=28 September 2007 }}. Retrieved 22 February 2007.</ref> This was three years ahead of USA and five years before the European common policy introduced in January 1998 allowed for an open and competitive telecommunication market.<ref name="tele"/> The Swedes, most of who are computer literate, enjoy a continuous growth in the Internet market and the availability of technologies such as Metro Ethernet, fiber, satellite, WAN access technologies and even the availability of 3G services. Statistically, 6.447 (2004) million telephone main lines are in use, 8.0436 (2005) million mobile cellular telephones are in use<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/sweden/ | title=Sweden | access-date=2007-02-14 | archive-date=10 January 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210110072816/https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/sweden | url-status=live }}</ref> and 6.7 million Swedes are regular internet users.

This abundance of telecommunication technology is a result of promoting a competitive industry that was made possible by deregulation.  Since Sweden was the first to take on this arduous task the government had to come up with "a regulatory framework of its own".<ref name="tele"/> The processes that went about resulting in the liberalization of the telecommunications' industry can be structured into three phases: "Phase 1 of monopoly to Phase 2 with a mix of monopoly and competition to a "mature" Phase 3 with extensive competition".<ref name="tele"/>
	
;Phase 1

# Started in 1980 with a parliamentary decision to open the market for terminals attached to the public network. Previously [[Televerket (Sweden)|Televerket]], a dominant telephone company in Sweden had sole right to attach equipment to the public network.<ref name="tele"/>
# Televerket creates a subsidiary called the Swedish Telecom International in 1989 to compete for international customers.<ref name="tele"/>
# Telia asks the government to become a limited liability company in 1990 and the government transforms Televerket into a public company by selling some shares. In fact, in 1987 the Director General of Televerket in his speech stated that he wanted the liberalization process to be completed.<ref name="tele"/>
# This initiative brings about the Telecommunication act effective on 1 July 1993 which was the first significant liberalization effect. The most important reason behind it was, "paradoxically, the efficiency of the national operator".<ref name="tele"/> The operator being Televerket. "In 1993 the new company Telia AB was formed and a new Telecommunications Act was launched".<ref name="tele"/>
# At this point the government has an indirect control over the company, wants to promote market competition, and does not want to hinder the support "for Televerket’s growth strategies".<ref name="tele"/>
# Televerket moves from just being a national operator to also being the national regulation body till 1992. Basically having a monopoly control by the blessing of the state.

;Phase 2
<ref name="tele"/>

# The emphasis is on the local loop also known as the "last mile". The aim is to introduce competition gradually but maintain some monopoly to deter entry into the market.
# Telia AB was not required to undergo a horizontal split. "It was and is the largest provider of both cable TV and mobile telecommunication".<ref name="tele"/>
# Several instances prevail to break up the company but that state does not approve. It continued to keep the company as a parastatal, and the incumbent continued to maintain a monopoly in the market.
# The main area of concern during Phase 2 is the issue of interconnection. Before the Telecommunications Act of 1993, the parastatal, could dictate its own terms, but after 1993, Telia was told to negotiate with companies seeking interconnection.

;Phase 3

During the period of 1993-2000 there is rise in competition with legislation of the regulatory body being changed several times. In the case of the [[Plain old telephone service|POTS]], Telia in 2000 still held monopoly in the fixed-line access market.<ref name="tele"/> Whereas, [[mobile phone]] and [[Internet]] penetration in the household market ended up being one of the highest in the world with more than 50 percent of the revenue coming from these two industries. There were three major organizations providing [[GSM]] services and 120 internet service providers.<ref name="tele"/> One of the major causes that lead competitions thrive in areas that did not have a history of monopoly was the light handed approach taken towards the interconnection issue by the regulatory body initially. [[TeliaSonera|Telia]] held very high interconnection charges, making it very difficult for new entrants to enter. But what it did do was push the new entrants to enter other markets. Tele2 did just that by taking out a massive marketing campaign to attract a huge number of customers to its internet access service. This campaign was successful enough to bring back Telia to the negotiation table over the interconnection issue .<ref name="tele"/> This process eventually lead to the abolition of the light handed regulatory approach towards interconnection and put more power in the hands of the regulatory body.  The intensity of regulation kept increasing around 1999 in areas other than POTS, especially the mobile market.