Editing Surface-to-air missile (section)

==History==
The first known idea for a guided surface-to-air missile was in 1925, when a [[beam riding]] system was proposed whereby a rocket would follow a searchlight beam onto a target. A selenium cell was mounted on the tip of each of the rocket's four tail fins, with the cells facing backwards.<ref>[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1951/1951%20-%200852.html "Evolution of the Guided Missile"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130515040018/http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1951/1951%20-%200852.html |date=2013-05-15 }} ''FLIGHT'', May 4, 1951, p. 535.</ref> When one selenium cell was no longer in the light beam, it would be steered in the opposite direction back into the beam. The first historical mention of a concept and design of a surface-to-air missile in which a drawing was presented, was by inventor Gustav Rasmus in 1931, who proposed a design that would home in on the sound of an aircraft's engines.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XygDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA26|title=Popular Science|first=Bonnier|last=Corporation|date=1 July 1931|publisher=Bonnier Corporation|via=Google Books|access-date=25 November 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160629171120/https://books.google.com/books?id=XygDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA26|archive-date=29 June 2016|url-status=live}}</ref>

===World War II===
During [[World War II]], efforts were started to develop surface-to-air missiles as it was generally considered that [[flak]] was of little use against [[bomber]]s of ever-increasing performance. The lethal radius of a flak shell is fairly small, and the chance of delivering a "hit" is essentially a fixed percentage per round. In order to attack a target, guns fire continually while the aircraft are in range in order to launch as many shells as possible, increasing the chance that one of these will end up within the lethal range. Against the [[Boeing B-17]], which operated just within the range of the numerous German [[8.8 cm Flak 18/36/37/41|eighty-eights]], an average of 2,805 rounds had to be fired per bomber destroyed.{{sfn|Westerman|2001|p=197}}

Bombers flying at higher altitudes require larger guns and shells to reach them. This greatly increases the cost of the system, and (generally) slows the rate of fire. Faster aircraft fly out of range more quickly, reducing the number of rounds fired against them. Against late-war designs like the [[Boeing B-29 Superfortress]] or jet-powered designs like the [[Arado Ar 234]], flak would be essentially useless.{{sfn|Westerman|2001|p=111}} This potential was already obvious by 1942, when [[Walther von Axthelm]] outlined the growing problems with flak defences that he predicted would soon be dealing with "aircraft speeds and flight altitudes [that] will gradually reach {{convert|1000|km/h|abbr=on}} and between {{convert|10000|-|15000|m|abbr=on}}."{{sfn|Westerman|2001|p=111}}<ref group=nb>This is a quote-of-a-quote and the original source is not available. Axthelm almost certainly stated these numbers in metric terms.</ref> This was seen generally; in November 1943 the Director of Gunnery Division of the [[Royal Navy]] concluded that guns would be useless against jets, stating "No projectile of which control is lost when it leaves the ship can be of any use to us in this matter."

====Axis efforts====
[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 141-1898, Peenemünde, Start Fla-Rakete "Wasserfall".jpg|thumb|right|A ''Wasserfall'' missile lifts off during a test flight.]]

The first serious consideration of a SAM development project was a series of conversations that took place in Germany during 1941. In February, Friederich Halder proposed a "flak rocket" concept, which led [[Walter Dornberger]] to ask [[Wernher von Braun]] to prepare a study on a guided missile able to reach between {{convert|15000|and|18000|m|abbr=on}} altitude. Von Braun became convinced a better solution was a crewed rocket interceptor, and said as much to the director of the [[T-Amt]], [[Roluf Lucht]], in July. The directors of the ''Luftwaffe'' flak arm were not interested in crewed aircraft, and the resulting disagreements between the teams delayed serious consideration of a SAM for two years.{{sfn|Westerman|2001|p=78}}

Von Axthelm published his concerns in 1942, and the subject saw serious consideration for the first time; initial development programs for liquid- and [[solid-fuel rocket]]s became part of the Flak Development Program of 1942.{{sfn|Westerman|2001|p=112}} By this point serious studies by the [[Peenemünde]] team had been prepared, and several rocket designs had been proposed, including 1940's ''[[Feuerlilie]]'', and 1941's [[Wasserfall missile|''Wasserfall'']] and [[Henschel Hs 117]] ''Schmetterling''. None of these projects saw any real development until 1943, when the first large-scale raids by the Allied [[air force]]s started. As the urgency of the problem grew, new designs were added, including ''[[Enzian]]'' and ''[[Rheintochter]]'', as well as the unguided [[Taifun (rocket)|''Taifun'']] which was designed to be launched in waves.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/cosford/collections/missiles/missile_info.cfm?missile_id=33 |title=Scheufeln Taifun |access-date=2006-07-16 |url-status=bot: unknown |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040110140650/http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/cosford/collections/missiles/missile_info.cfm?missile_id=33 |archive-date=10 January 2004 |website=RAF Museum }}</ref>

In general, these designs could be split into two groups. One set of designs would be boosted to altitude in front of the bombers and then flown towards them on a head-on approach at low speeds comparable to crewed aircraft. These designs included the Feuerlilie, Schmetterling and Enzian. The second group were high-speed missiles, typically supersonic, that flew directly towards their targets from below. These included Wasserfall and Rheintochter. Both types used [[radio control]] for guidance, either by eye, or by comparing the returns of the missile and target on a single radar screen. Development of all these systems was carried out at the same time, and the war ended before any of them was ready for combat use. The infighting between various groups in the military also delayed development. Some extreme fighter designs, like the [[Me 163|''Komet'']] and [[Bachem Ba 349|''Natter'']], also overlapped with SAMs in their intended uses.

[[Albert Speer]] was especially supportive of missile development. In his opinion, had they been consistently developed from the start, the large scale [[Combined Bomber Offensive|bomber raids of 1944]] would have been impossible.<ref>Albert Speer, "Inside the Third Reich", Macmillan, p. 492.</ref>

====Allied efforts====
[[File:Fairey Stooge.png|thumb|right|Typical of the "boost-glide" type weapons, the Fairey Stooge was an armed drone aircraft flown to a collision with the target. ''Enzian'' and ''Schmetterling'' were similar in concept, design and performance.]]

The British developed unguided antiaircraft rockets (operated under the name [[Z Battery]]) close to the start of [[World War II]], but the [[air superiority]] usually held by the Allies meant that the demand for similar weapons was not as acute.

When several Allied ships were sunk in 1943 by [[Henschel Hs 293]] and [[Fritz X]] [[glide bomb]]s, Allied interest changed. These weapons were released from stand-off distances, with the bomber remaining outside the range of the ship's [[antiaircraft gun]]s, and the missiles themselves were too small and fast to be attacked effectively.<ref name="nmsu"/>

To combat this threat, the [[U.S. Navy]] launched [[Operation Bumblebee]] to develop a ramjet-powered missile to destroy the launching aircraft at long range.<ref name="nmsu">{{cite web|url=http://nmsua.edu/tiopete/files/2008/12/wspgcoldbook.pdf|title=A Brief History of White Sands Proving Ground 1941–1965|publisher=New Mexico State University|access-date=2010-08-19|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141028154222/http://nmsua.edu/tiopete/files/2008/12/wspgcoldbook.pdf|archive-date=2014-10-28}}</ref> The initial performance goal was to target an intercept at a horizontal range of {{convert|10|miles}} and {{convert|30,000|ft}} altitude, with a {{convert|300|to|600|lb|kg}} warhead for a 30 to 60 percent kill probability.<ref name="hays">{{cite web|url=http://www.okieboat.com/Talos%20history.html|title=Talos Missile History|publisher=Hays, Philip R.|access-date=2010-08-19|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130622194123/http://www.okieboat.com/Talos%20history.html|archive-date=2013-06-22|url-status=live}}</ref> This weapon did not emerge for 16 years, when it entered operation as the [[RIM-8 Talos]].<ref>Phillip Hays, [http://www.okieboat.com/Talos%20history.html "History of the Talos Missile"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130622194123/http://www.okieboat.com/Talos%20history.html |date=2013-06-22 }}</ref>

Heavy shipping losses to ''[[kamikaze]]'' attacks during the [[Philippines Campaign (1944-45)|Liberation of the Philippines]] and the [[Battle of Okinawa]] provided additional incentive for guided missile development.<ref name="nmsu"/><ref name="Taylor45"/> This led to the British ''[[Fairey Stooge]]'' and ''[[Brakemine]]'' efforts,<ref>''Flight'' 1947, p.345</ref> and the [[U.S. Navy]]'s [[SAM-N-2 Lark]].<ref name="PLark">Parsch 2003</ref> The ''Lark'' ran into considerable difficulty and it never entered operational use. The end of the war led to the British efforts being used strictly for research and development throughout their lifetime.<ref name="Taylor45">Taylor 1975, p.45</ref>

===Post-war deployments===
[[File:Nike ajax 32.jpg|thumb|right|upright|[[Nike Ajax]] was the first operational SAM system.]]
[[File:SA-2 Guideline.JPG|thumb|right|[[SA-2 Guideline]] surface-to-air missiles, one of the most widely deployed SAM systems in the world]]

In the immediate post-war era, SAM developments were under way around the world, with several of these entering service in the early- and mid-1950s.

Coming to the same conclusions as the Germans regarding flak, the [[U.S. Army]] started its [[Project Nike]] developments in 1944. Led by [[Bell Labs]], the [[Nike Ajax]] was tested in production form in 1952, becoming the first operational SAM system when it was activated in March 1954.<ref name=flight>[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1962/1962%20-%201337.html "Nike Zeus"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928045209/http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1962/1962%20-%201337.html |date=2013-09-28 }}, Flight International, 2 August 1962</ref> Concerns about Ajax's ability to deal with formations of aircraft led to greatly updated version of the same basic design entering service in 1958 as the [[Nike Hercules]], the first nuclear-armed SAM.<ref name=flight/> The [[U.S. Army Air Forces]] had also considered collision-course weapons (like the German radio-controlled concepts) and launched Project Thumper in 1946. This was merged with another project, Wizard, and emerged as the [[CIM-10 Bomarc]] in 1959. The ''Bomarc'' had a range of over 500&nbsp;km, but it was quite expensive and somewhat unreliable.<ref>[http://radomes.pandapawuniverse.com/C_BOMARC.php "The Boeing IM-99/CIM-10 BOMARC"]{{dead link|date=January 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, National Air Defense Radar Museum</ref>
Development of [[Rheinmetall Air Defence|Oerlikon]]'s [[RSD 58]]<ref>[http://www.flightglobal.com/FlightPDFArchive/1955/1955%20-%200007.pdf "Swiss Guided Missile"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130515025848/http://www.flightglobal.com/FlightPDFArchive/1955/1955%20-%200007.pdf |date=2013-05-15 }} ''Flight'', 7 January 1955, p. 7.</ref> started in 1947, and was a closely held secret until 1955. Early versions of the missile were available for purchase as early as 1952,<ref>[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1956/1956%20-%201746.html "Guided Missiles"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130515022443/http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1956/1956%20-%201746.html |date=2013-05-15 }}, ''FLIGHT'', 7 December 1956, p. 910.</ref> but never entered operational service. The RSD 58 used [[beam riding]] guidance, which has limited performance against high-speed aircraft, as the missile is unable to "lead" the target to a collision point. Examples were purchased by several nations for testing and training purposes, but no operational sales were made.<ref>Bill Gunston, ''Rockets & Missiles'', Salamander Books, 1979, p. 156.</ref>

The [[Soviet Union]] began development of a SAM system in earnest with the opening of the [[Cold War]]. [[Joseph Stalin]] was worried that [[Moscow]] would be subjected to American and British [[Strategic bombing|air raids]], like those against [[Berlin]], and, in 1951, he demanded that a missile system to counter a 900 bomber raid be built as quickly as possible. This led to the [[S-25 Berkut]] system ([[NATO reporting name]]: SA-1 "Guild"), which was designed, developed and deployed in a rush program. Early units entered operational service on 7 May 1955, and the entire system ringing Moscow was completely activated by June 1956.<ref>''The Illustrated Encyclopedia of 20th Century Weapons and Warfare'' Vol. 11, pp. 1175–1176, general editor Bernard Fitzsimons, Purnell & Sons Ltd. 1967/68.</ref> The system failed, however, to detect, track, and intercept the only overflight of the Soviet capital Moscow by a U-2 reconnaissance plane on July 5, 1956.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Gruntman |first1=Mike |title=Intercept 1961 : the birth of Soviet missile defense |date=2015 |location=Reston, VA |isbn=9781624103490 |edition=1st}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Gruntman |first1=Mike |title=Intercept 1961: From Air Defense SA-1 to Missile Defense System A [Scanning our Past] |journal=Proceedings of the IEEE |date=April 2016 |volume=104 |issue=4 |pages=883–890 |doi=10.1109/JPROC.2016.2537023 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2016.2537023 |issn=1558-2256}}</ref> The S-25 was a static system, but efforts were also put into a smaller design that would be much more mobile. This emerged in 1957 as the famous [[S-75 Dvina]] (SA-2 "Guideline"), a portable system, with very high performance, that remained in operation into the 2000s.<ref>[http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/s75.htm "S-75"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121005194237/http://astronautix.com/lvs/s75.htm |date=2012-10-05 }}, Encyclopedia Astronautica</ref> The Soviet Union remained at the forefront of SAM development throughout its history; and Russia has followed suit.

The early British developments with ''Stooge'' and ''Brakemine'' were successful, but further development was curtailed in the post-war era. These efforts picked up again with the opening of the Cold War, following the "Stage Plan" of improving UK air defences with new radars, fighters and missiles. Two competing designs were proposed for "Stage 1", based on common radar and control units, and these emerged as the RAF's [[Bristol Bloodhound]] in 1958,<ref>[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1959/1959%20-%202746.html "Bloodhound: The SAGW System of the Royal Air Force."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131101232426/http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1959/1959%20-%202746.html |date=2013-11-01 }}, ''Flight International'', 23 October 1959, pp. 431–438.</ref> and the Army's [[English Electric Thunderbird]] in 1959.<ref>[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1959/1959%20-%202460.html "Thunderbird"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131003050450/http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1959/1959%20-%202460.html |date=2013-10-03 }}, ''Flight International'', 25 September 1959, pp. 295–299, 302–303.</ref> A third design followed the American ''Bumblebee'' efforts in terms of role and timeline, and entered service in 1961 as the [[Sea Slug (missile)|Sea Slug]].<ref>[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1958/1958-1-%20-%200786.html "Seaslug: The Most Missile in the Least Space"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131101232412/http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1958/1958-1-%20-%200786.html |date=2013-11-01 }}, ''Flight International'', 21 November 1958, pp. 790–794</ref>

===War in Vietnam===
{{See also|List of US aircraft losses to missiles during the Vietnam War}}
[[File:F-105 hit by SA-2 over Vietnam.jpg|thumb|right|A moment after an S-75 Dvina (SA-2) hits an F-105 over North Vietnam, the fighter-bomber starts to spew flame.]]
[[File:RF-4C Phantom II of the 11th TRS is shot down by a S-75 missile over Vietnam, 12 August 1967.jpg|thumb|right|An S-75 detonates directly below an RF-4C [[reconnaissance plane]]. The crew ejected and were taken captive.]]

The Vietnam War was the first modern war in which guided antiaircraft missiles seriously challenged highly advanced supersonic jet aircraft. It would also be the first and only time that the latest and most modern [[air defense]] technologies of the [[Soviet Union]] and the most modern jet [[fighter plane]]s and [[bombers]] of the United States confronted each other in combat (if one does not count the Yom Kippur War wherein IAF was challenged by Syrian SA-3s).<ref>Michel III p. 1-4</ref> 

The [[USAF]] responded to this threat with increasingly effective means. Early efforts to directly attack the missiles sites as part of [[Operation Spring High]] and [[Operation Iron Hand]] were generally unsuccessful, but the introduction of [[Wild Weasel]] aircraft carrying [[AGM-45 Shrike|''Shrike'' missile]]s and the [[Standard ARM]] missile changed the situation dramatically. Feint and counterfeint followed as each side introduced new tactics to try to gain the upper hand. By the time of [[Operation Linebacker II]] in 1972, the Americans had gained critical information about the performance and operations of the S-75 (via Arab S-75 systems captured by Israel), and used these missions as a way to demonstrate the capability of [[strategic bomber]]s to operate in a SAM saturated environment. Their first missions appeared to demonstrate the exact opposite, with the loss of three B-52s and several others damaged in a single mission.<ref>Steven Zaloga, "Red SAM: The SA-2 Guideline Anti-Aircraft Missile", Osprey Publishing, 2007, p. 22</ref> Dramatic changes followed, and by the end of the series, missions were carried out with additional chaff, ECM, Iron Hand, and other changes that dramatically changed the score.<ref>Marshall Michel, [http://www.airspacemag.com/military-aviation/christmas-bombing.html?c=y&page=10 "The Christmas Bombing"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130621100501/http://www.airspacemag.com/military-aviation/christmas-bombing.html?c=y&page=10 |date=2013-06-21 }}, ''Air and Space'', January 2001</ref> By the conclusion of the Linebacker II campaign, the shootdown rate of the S-75 against the B-52s was 7.52% (15 B-52s were shot down, 5 B-52s were heavily damaged for 266 missiles)<ref>Zaloga, Steven J. Red SAM: The SA-2 Guideline Anti-Aircraft Missile. Osprey Publishing, 2007. {{ISBN|978-1-84603-062-8}}. p. 22</ref>

During the war, The Soviet Union supplied 7,658 SAMs to North Vietnam, and their defense forces conducted about 5,800 launches, usually in multiples of three. By the war's end, the U.S lost a total of 3,374 aircraft in combat operations. According to the North Vietnamese, 31% were shot down by S-75 missiles (1,046 aircraft, or 5.6 missiles per one kill); 60% were shot down by anti-aircraft guns; and 9% were shot down by MiG fighters. The S-75 missile system significantly improved the effectiveness of North Vietnamese anti-aircraft artillery, which used data from S-75 radar stations<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://svpressa.ru/post/article/213039/|title = Русская "Двина", сбив сотни "Фантомов", довела американцев до психоза - Статьи - История - Свободная Пресса|date = 14 October 2018|language=ru}}</ref> However, the U.S states only 205 of those aircraft were lost to North Vietnamese surface-to-air missiles.<ref>Davies p. 72-74</ref>

===Smaller, faster===
[[File:Zestaw przeciwrakietowy Osa.JPG|thumb|right|The Osa was the first system to include search, track and missiles all on a single mobile platform.]]
[[File:Poliment-Redut naval anti-aircraft missile system.webm|thumb|left|Video of launch of Poliment-Redut naval SAM]]

All of these early systems were "heavyweight" designs with limited mobility and requiring considerable set-up time. However, they were also increasingly effective. By the early 1960s, the deployment of SAMs had rendered high-speed high-altitude flight in combat practically suicidal.<ref group="nb">The introduction of effective SAMs led to the cancellation of the B-70 bomber, and the prohibition of crewed reconnaissance flights over the Soviet Union.</ref> The way to avoid this was to fly lower, below the line-of-sight of missile's radar systems. This demanded very different aircraft, like the [[General Dynamics F-111 Aardvark|F-111]], [[BAC TSR-2|TSR-2]], and [[Panavia Tornado]].

Consequently, SAMs evolved rapidly in the 1960s. As their targets were now being forced to fly lower due to the presence of the larger missiles, engagements would necessarily be at short ranges, and occur quickly. Shorter ranges meant the missiles could be much smaller, which aided them in terms of mobility. By the mid-1960s, almost all modern armed forces had short-range missiles mounted on trucks or light armour that could move with the armed forces they protected. Examples include the [[2K12 Kub]] (SA-6) and [[9K33 Osa]] (SA-8), [[MIM-23 Hawk]], [[Rapier missile|Rapier]], [[Roland (missile)|Roland]] and [[Crotale (missile)|Crotale]].

The introduction of [[sea-skimming missile]]s in the late 1960s and 1970s led to additional mid- and short-range designs for defence against these targets. The UK's [[Sea Cat]] was an early example that was designed specifically to replace the [[Bofors 40 mm Automatic Gun L/60|Bofors 40 mm]] gun on its mount, and became the first operational point-defense SAM.<ref>[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1963/1963%20-%201625.html "SEACAT – The Guided Missile To Defend Small Ships"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131101232424/http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1963/1963%20-%201625.html |date=2013-11-01 }}, ''Flight International'', 5 September 1963, p. 438.</ref> The American [[RIM-7 Sea Sparrow]] quickly proliferated into a wide variety of designs fielded by most navies. Many of these are adapted from earlier mobile designs, but the special needs of the naval role has resulted in the continued existence of many custom missiles.

===MANPADS===
{{main|MANPADS}}
[[File:Starstreak.JPG|thumb|right|[[Starstreak missile|Starstreak]] laser-guided surface-to-air missile of the [[British Army]].]]

As aircraft moved ever lower, and missile performance continued to improve, eventually it became possible to build an effective man-portable anti-aircraft missile. Known as [[MANPADS]], the first example was a Royal Navy system known as the [[Holman Projector]], used as a last-ditch weapon on smaller ships. The Germans also produced a similar short-range weapon known as [[Fliegerfaust]], but it entered operation only on a very limited scale. The performance gap between this weapon and jet fighters of the post-war era was so great that such designs would not be effective.

By the 1960s, technology had closed this gap to a degree, leading to the introduction of the [[FIM-43 Redeye]], [[SA-7 Grail]] and [[Blowpipe (missile)|Blowpipe]]. Rapid improvement in the 1980s led to second generation designs, like the [[FIM-92 Stinger]], [[9K34 Strela-3]] (SA-14), [[9K38 Igla|Igla-1]] and [[Starstreak missile|Starstreak]], with dramatically improved performance. By the 1990s to the 2010s, the Chinese had developed designs drawing influence from these, notably the [[FN-6]] and the [[QW missile|QW series]].

Through the evolution of SAMs, improvements were also being made to [[anti-aircraft artillery]], but the missiles pushed them into ever shorter-range roles. By the 1980s, the only remaining widespread use was point-defense of airfields and ships, especially against [[cruise missile]]s. By the 1990s, even these roles were being encroached on by new MANPADS and similar short-range weapons, like the [[RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missile]].
{{-}}