Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Social geography
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== History == === Before World War II === The term "social geography" (or rather "gĂ©ographie sociale") originates from France, where it was used both by geographer [[ĂlisĂ©e Reclus]] and by sociologists of the [[Pierre Guillaume FrĂ©dĂ©ric le Play|Le Play]] School, perhaps independently from each other. In fact, the first proven occurrence of the term derives from a review of Reclus' ''Nouvelle gĂ©ographie universelle'' from 1884, written by [[Paul de Rousiers]], a member of the Le Play School. Reclus himself used the expression in several letters, the first one dating from 1895, and in his last work ''L'Homme et la terre'' from 1905. The first person to employ the term as part of a publication's title was [[Edmond Demolins]], another member of the Le Play School, whose article ''GĂ©ographie sociale de la France'' was published in 1896 and 1897. After the death of Reclus as well as the main proponents of Le Play's ideas, and with [[Ămile Durkheim]] turning away from his early concept of [[social morphology]],<ref name="term" /> [[Paul Vidal de la Blache]], who noted that geography "is a science of places and not a science of men",<ref>[[Paul Vidal de la Blache|Vidal de la Blache, Paul]] (1913): Des caractĂšres distinctifs de la gĂ©ographie. ''[[Annales de GĂ©ographie]]'' 22: 289-299 [297]. {{in lang|fr}} Cited by: [[Paul Claval|Claval, Paul]] (1986): Social Geography in France. In: Eyles, John (ed.): Social Geography in International perspective. Totowa (Barnes & Noble): 13-29 [13-14].</ref> remained the most influential figure of French geography. One of his students, [[Camille Vallaux]], wrote the two-volume book ''GĂ©ographie sociale'', published in 1908 and 1911.<ref name="term" /> [[Jean Brunhes]], one of Vidal's most influential disciples, included a level of (spatial) interactions among groups into his fourfold structure of human geography.<ref>[[Jean Brunhes|Brunhes, Jean]] (1924): Human Geography. London (G.G. Harrap & Co.). [36-46] (Originally published in French in 1910) Cited by: Buttimer, Anne (1968): 137.</ref> Until the Second World War, no more theoretical framework for social geography was developed, though, leading to a concentration on rather descriptive rural and [[regional geography]].<ref>Buttimer, Anne (1968): 137.</ref><ref>HĂ©rin, Robert (1984): Social Geography in France - Heritages and Perspectives. ''GeoJournal'' 9 (3): 231-240 [231].</ref><ref group="note">As Paul Claval (1986) puts it: "At mid-century, French geography was more open to social problems than other schools, but there is nothing like a recognised social geographical field." (p. 15)</ref> However, Vidal's works were influential for the historical [[Annales School]],<ref>Werlen, Benno (2008): 57.</ref> who also shared the rural bias with the contemporary geographers,<ref>Claval, Paul (1986): 14.</ref> and Durkheim's concept of social morphology was later developed and set in connection with social geography by sociologists [[Marcel Mauss]]<ref>[[Marcel Mauss|Mauss, Marcel]] (1927): Divisions et proportions des divisions de la sociologie. ''L'AnnĂ©e Sociologique'', Nouvelle SĂ©rie 2: 98-173 [112]. {{in lang|fr}}</ref> and [[Maurice Halbwachs]].<ref>Thomale, Eckhard (1972): 136-138.</ref> The first person in the Anglo-American tradition to use the term "social geography" was George Wilson Hoke, whose paper ''The Study of Social Geography''<ref>Hoke, G. W. (1907): The Study of Social Geography. ''The Geographical Journal'' 29 (1): 64-67.</ref> was published in 1907, yet there is no indication it had any academic impact. Le Play's work, however, was taken up in Britain by [[Patrick Geddes]] and [[Andrew John Herbertson]].<ref name="term" /> Percy M. Roxby, a former student of Herbertson, in 1930 identified social geography as one of human geography's four main branches.<ref>Roxby, P. M. (1930): The Scope and Aims of Human Geography. ''Scottish Geographical Journal'' 46 (5): 276-290 [283].</ref> By contrast, the American academic geography of that time was dominated by the Berkeley School of Cultural Geography led by [[Carl O. Sauer]], while the spatial distribution of social groups was already studied by the [[Chicago school (sociology)|Chicago School of Sociology]].<ref>Del Casino Jr., Vincent J. and Sallie A. Marston (2006): 997, 999-1000.</ref> [[Harlan H. Barrows]], a geographer at the University of Chicago, nevertheless regarded social geography as one of the three major divisions of geography.<ref>[[Harlan H. Barrows|Barrows, H. H.]] (1923): Geography as Human Ecology. ''Annals of the Association of American Geographers'' 13 (1): 1-14 [7].</ref> Another pre-war concept that combined elements of sociology and geography was the one established by Dutch sociologist [[Sebald Rudolf Steinmetz]] and his Amsterdam School of [[Sociography]]. However, it lacked a definitive subject, being a combination of geography and [[ethnography]] created as the more concrete counterpart to the rather theoretical sociology. In contrast, the Utrecht School of Social geography, which emerged in the early 1930s, sought to study the relationship between social groups and their [[living space]]s.<ref>Thomale, Eckhard (1972): 108-110, 177-178.</ref><ref>Ernste, Huib and Lothar Smith (2009): Dutch Human Geography. In: Kitchin, Rob and Nigel Thrift (eds.): [[International Encyclopedia of Human Geography]]. Oxford (Elsevier): 255-265 [256].</ref> === Post-war period === ==== Continental Europe ==== In the German-language geography, this focus on the connection between social groups and the [[landscape]] was further developed by [[Hans Bobek]] and [[Wolfgang Hartke]] after the Second World War.<ref>Hajdu, Joseph J. (1968): Toward a Definition of Post-War German Social Geography. ''Annals of the Association of American Geographers'' 58 (2): 397-410.</ref><ref group="note">Though the term "Sozialgeographie" had been used before, the first call for a systematic consideration of social groups within German-language geography came from Richard Busch-Zantner (1937): Zur Ordnung der anthropogenen Faktoren. ''Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen'' 83: 138-141 [139]. {{in lang|de}} (Cited by: Werlen, Benno (2008): 75-76.). However, he died in the Second World War.</ref> For Bobek, groups of ''Lebensformen'' (patterns of life)âinfluenced by social factorsâthat formed the landscape, were at the center of his social geographical analysis.<ref>Bobek, Hans (1948): Stellung und Bedeutung der Sozialgeographie. ''[[Erdkunde]]'' 2: 118-125 [122]. {{in lang|de}}</ref> In a similar approach, Hartke considered the landscape a source for indices or traces of certain social groups' behaviour.<ref>[[Wolfgang Hartke|Hartke, Wolfgang]] (1959): Gedanken ĂŒber die Bestimmung von RĂ€umen gleichen sozialgeographischen Verhaltens. ''Erdkunde'' 13 (4): 426-436 [427]. {{in lang|de}}</ref> The best-known example of this perspective was the concept of ''Sozialbrache'' (social-fallow),<ref>Hartke, Wolfgang (1956): Die Sozialbrache als PhĂ€nomen der geographischen Differenzierung der Landschaft. ''Erdkunde'' 10 (4): 257-269. {{in lang|de}}</ref> i.e. the abandoning of tillage as an indicator for occupational shifts away from agriculture.<ref>Thomale, Eckhard (1984): Social Geographical Research in Germany - a Balance Sheet for the Years 1950-1980. ''GeoJournal'' 9 (3): 223-230 [228].</ref> Though the French ''GĂ©ographie Sociale'' had been a great influence especially on Hartke's ideas,<ref>Hajdu (1968): 400</ref> no such distinct school of thought formed within the French human geography.<ref>HĂ©rin (1984): 231.</ref><ref>Claval (1986): 15.</ref> Nonetheless, [[Albert Demangeon]] paved the way for a number of more systematic conceptualizations of the field with his (posthumously published) notion<ref>Demangeon, A. (1942): ProblĂšmes de gĂ©ographie humaine. Paris (Armand Colin). [28]</ref> that social groups ought to be within the center of human geographical analysis.<ref>Werlen (2008): 60.</ref> That task was carried out by [[Pierre George]] and [[Maximilien Sorre]], among others. Then a Marxist,<ref>HĂ©rin (1984): 232.</ref> George's stance was dominated by a socio-economic rationale,<ref>Buttimer (1968): 137.</ref> but without the [[Structural Marxism|structuralist interpretations]] found in the works of some the French sociologists of the time.<ref>Claval (1986): 17-18.</ref> However, it was another French Marxist, the sociologist [[Henri Lefebvre]], who introduced the concept of the (social) production of space.<ref>Claval, Paul (1984): The Concept of Social Space and the Nature of Social Geography. ''New Zealand Geographer'' 40 (2): 105-109 [105-106].</ref> He had written on that and related topics since the 1930s,<ref>[[Richard Peet|Peet, Richard]] (1998): Modern Geographical Thought. Oxford, Malden (Blackwell). [100-102]</ref> but fully expounded it in ''La Production de L'Espace''<ref>[[Henri Lefebvre|Lefebvre, Henri]] (1974): La Production de L'Espace. Paris (Anthropos).</ref> as late as 1974. Sorre developed a schema of society related to the ecological idea of [[habitat]], which was applied to an urban context by the sociologist [[Paul-Henry Chombart de Lauwe]].<ref>Buttimer, Anne (1969): Social Space in Interdisciplinary Perspective. ''Geographical Review'' 59 (3): 417-426.</ref> For the Dutch geographer {{ill|Christiaan van Paassen|nl|Chris van Paassen}}, the world consisted of socio-spatial entities of different scales formed by what he referred to as a "syn-ecological complex",<ref>[[Christiaan van Paassen|van Passen, Christiaan]] (1965): Preliminary to social-geographical theory. Utrecht. [3-5]</ref> an idea influenced by [[existentialism]].<ref>Hoekveld, Gerard (2003): Christiaan van Paassen (1917-1996). In: Armstrong, Patrick H. and Geoffrey J. Martin (eds.): Geographers: Biobibliographical Studies (22). New York: 157-168 [158].</ref> A more analytical ecological approach on human geography was the one developed by [[Edgar Kant]] in his native Estonia in the 1930s and later at [[Lund University]], which he called "anthropo-ecology". His awareness of the temporal dimension of social life would lead to the formation of [[time geography]] through the works of [[Torsten HĂ€gerstrand]] and [[Sven Godlund]].<ref>Buttimer, Anne (2005): Edgar Kant (1902â1978): A Baltic Pioneer. ''Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography'' 87 (3): 175-192 [179-180].</ref> <!-- == Social space == {{Main|Social space}} == Research and application == == Institutional organisation == -->
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Social geography
(section)
Add topic