Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Sharkovskii's theorem
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Statement== For some [[interval (mathematics)|interval]] <math>I\subset \mathbb{R}</math>, suppose that <math display=block>f : I \to I</math> is a [[continuous function]]. The number <math>x</math> is called a ''periodic point of period <math>m</math>'' if <math>f^{(m)}(x)=x</math>, where <math>f^{(m)}</math> denotes the [[iterated function]] obtained by composition of <math>m</math> copies of <math>f</math>. The number <math>x</math> is said to have ''least period <math>m</math>'' if, in addition, <math>f^{(k)}(x)\ne x</math> for all <math>0<k<m</math>. Sharkovskii's theorem concerns the possible least periods of periodic points of <math>f</math>. Consider the following ordering of the positive [[integer]]s, sometimes called the Sharkovskii ordering:<ref>K. Burns, B. Hasselblatt, "[https://www.math.arizona.edu/~dwang/BurnsHasselblattRevised-1.pdf The Sharkovsky Theorem: A Natural Direct Proof]" (2008). Accessed 3 February 2023.</ref> <math display=block>\begin{array}{cccccccc} 3 & 5 & 7 & 9 & 11 & \ldots & (2n+1)\cdot2^{0} & \ldots\\ 3\cdot2 & 5\cdot2 & 7\cdot2 & 9\cdot2 & 11\cdot2 & \ldots & (2n+1)\cdot2^{1} & \ldots\\ 3\cdot2^{2} & 5\cdot2^{2} & 7\cdot2^{2} & 9\cdot2^{2} & 11\cdot2^{2} & \ldots & (2n+1)\cdot2^{2} & \ldots\\ 3\cdot2^{3} & 5\cdot2^{3} & 7\cdot2^{3} & 9\cdot2^{3} & 11\cdot2^{3} & \ldots & (2n+1)\cdot2^{3} & \ldots\\ & \vdots\\ \ldots & 2^{n} & \ldots & 2^{4} & 2^{3} & 2^{2} & 2 & 1\end{array}</math> It consists of: * [[odd number|the odd numbers]] ''excluding'' <math> 1 </math> <math> = (2n+1)\cdot2^0</math> in ''increasing'' order, * 2 times the odd numbers <math> = (2n+1)\cdot2^1</math> in ''increasing'' order, * 4 times the odd numbers <math> = (2n+1)\cdot2^2</math> in ''increasing'' order, * 8 times the odd numbers <math> = (2n+1)\cdot2^3</math>, * etc. <math> = (2n+1)\cdot2^m</math> * finally, the powers of two <math> = 2^n</math> in ''decreasing'' order. This ordering is a [[total order]]: every positive integer appears exactly once somewhere on this list. However, it is not a [[well-order]]. In a well-order, every subset would have an earliest element, but in this order there is no earliest power of two. Sharkovskii's theorem states that if <math>f</math> has a periodic point of least period <math>m</math>, and <math>m</math> precedes <math>n</math> in the above ordering, then <math>f</math> has also a periodic point of least period <math>n</math>. One consequence is that if <math>f</math> has only finitely many periodic points, then they must all have periods that are powers of two. Furthermore, if there is a periodic point of period three, then there are periodic points of all other periods. Sharkovskii's theorem does not state that there are ''stable'' cycles of those periods, just that there are cycles of those periods. For systems such as the [[logistic map]], the [[bifurcation diagram]] shows a range of parameter values for which apparently the only cycle has period 3. In fact, there must be cycles of all periods there, but they are not stable and therefore not visible on the computer-generated picture. The assumption of continuity is important. Without this assumption, the discontinuous [[piecewise linear function]] <math>f:[0,3) \to [0,3)</math> defined as: <math display=block>f: x\mapsto \begin{cases}x+1 &\mathrm{for\ } 0\le x<2 \\ x-2 &\mathrm{for\ } 2\le x< 3\end{cases}</math> for which every value has period 3, would be a counterexample. Similarly essential is the assumption of <math>f</math> being defined on an interval. Otherwise <math>f : x \mapsto (1 - x)^{-1}</math>, which is defined on real numbers except the one: <math>\mathbb R\setminus\{1\},</math> and for which every non-zero value has period 3, would be a counterexample.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Sharkovskii's theorem
(section)
Add topic