Editing Religion and sexuality (section)

==Abrahamic religions==
[[Abrahamic religions]] (namely [[Judaism]], [[Samaritanism]], [[Christianity]], the [[Baháʼí Faith]], and [[Islam]]) have traditionally affirmed and endorsed a [[Patriarchy|patriarchal]] and [[Heteronormativity|heteronormative]] approach towards [[human sexuality]].<ref name="Int J Transgend.">{{cite journal |author1-last=Campbell |author1-first=Marianne |author2-last=Hinton |author2-first=Jordan D. X. |author3-last=Anderson |author3-first=Joel R. |date=February 2019 |title=A systematic review of the relationship between religion and attitudes toward transgender and gender-variant people |journal=[[International Journal of Transgenderism]] |publisher=[[Taylor & Francis]] |volume=20 |issue=1 |pages=21–38 |doi=10.1080/15532739.2018.1545149 |doi-access=free |issn=1553-2739 |lccn=2004213389 |oclc=56795128 |pmc=6830999 |pmid=32999592 |s2cid=151069171 |quote=Many religions are based on teachings of peace, love, and tolerance, and thus, at least based on those specific teachings, these religions promote intergroup pro-sociality. However, evidence from studies of religion and social attitudes have paradoxically revealed that religion is typically a predictor of intergroup anti-sociality, or in other words religion tends to predict most forms of prejudice. When conceptualizing religion in terms of self-reported categorical religious affiliation (i.e., [[Christian]], [[Muslim]], [[Jewish]], etc.), religiously affiliated individuals tend to report more negative attitudes against a variety of social outgroups than individuals who are not religiously affiliated. [...] In addition, most [[Abrahamic religions]] (e.g., [[Judaism]], [[Christianity]], and [[Islam]]) contain dogmas in which their respective deity create mankind with individuals who are perfectly entrenched in the gender binary (e.g., [[Adam and Eve]]), and thus religions might be instilling cisgender normativity into individuals who ascribe to their doctrines.}}</ref><ref name="Graham 2017">{{cite book |last=Graham |first=Philip |year=2017 |chapter=Male Sexuality and Pornography |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X74pDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA250 |title=Men and Sex: A Sexual Script Approach |location=[[Cambridge]] and [[New York City|New York]] |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |pages=250–251 |doi= 10.1017/9781316874998.013 |isbn=9781107183933 |lccn=2017004137 |quote=[[Patriarchy|Patriarchal beliefs]] assert the "natural" [[Male supremacism|superiority of men]] with a right to leadership in family and public life. Such beliefs derive particularly from [[Abrahamic religions]]. Patriarchal attitudes relating to sexual behaviour are mixed and inconsistent. They include, on one hand, the idea that as part of their natural inferiority, [[women]] are less in control of their sex drives and are therefore essentially lustful, with a constant craving for sex. This belief leads to the [[rape myth]] – even when women resist sexual advances they are using it merely as a seductive device. On the other hand, patriarchal beliefs also dictate that women, in contrast to men, are naturally submissive and have little interest in sex, so men have a "natural" right to sexual intercourse whether women want it or not.}}</ref><ref name="Mbuwayesango 2016">{{cite book |author-last=Mbuwayesango |author-first=Dora R. |year=2016 |orig-date=2015 |chapter=Part III: The Bible and Bodies – Sex and Sexuality in Biblical Narrative |editor-last=Fewell |editor-first=Danna N. |editor-link=Danna Nolan Fewell |title=The Oxford Handbook of Biblical Narrative |location=[[Oxford]] and [[New York City|New York]] |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |pages=456–465 |doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199967728.013.39 |isbn=9780199967728 |lccn=2015033360 |s2cid=146505567}}</ref><ref name="Leeming 2003">{{cite journal |author-last=Leeming |author-first=David A. |author-link=David Adams Leeming |date=June 2003 |title=Religion and Sexuality: The Perversion of a Natural Marriage |editor-last=Carey |editor-first=Lindsay B. |journal=[[Journal of Religion and Health]] |publisher=[[Springer Verlag]] |volume=42 |issue=2 |pages=101–109 |doi=10.1023/A:1023621612061 |issn=1573-6571 |jstor=27511667 |s2cid=38974409}}</ref>

[[Catholicism]] in particular favours exclusively [[Heterosexual intercourse|penetrative vaginal intercourse between men and women]] within the boundaries of [[marriage]] over all other forms of [[human sexual activity]],<ref name="Mbuwayesango 2016"/><ref name="Leeming 2003"/> including [[autoeroticism]], [[masturbation]], [[anal sex]], [[oral sex]], [[Non-penetrative sex|non-penetrative]] and [[Homosexual sexual practices|non-heterosexual]] sexual intercourse (all of which have been labeled as "[[sodomy]]" at various times),<ref name="Sauer 2015 74–78">{{cite book |last=Sauer |first=Michelle M. |year=2015 |chapter=The Unexpected Actuality: "Deviance" and Transgression |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=U8mBCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA74 |title=Gender in Medieval Culture |location=[[London]] |publisher=[[Bloomsbury Academic]] |pages=74–78 |doi=10.5040/9781474210683.ch-003 |isbn=978-1-4411-2160-8}}</ref> believing and teaching that such behaviors are forbidden and considered [[sin]]ful,<ref name="Mbuwayesango 2016"/><ref name="Leeming 2003"/> and further compared to or derived from the alleged behavior of the residents of [[Sodom and Gomorrah]].<ref name="Mbuwayesango 2016"/><ref name="Gnuse 2015"/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.catholic.org/national/national_story.php?id=29699 |title=Bishop Soto tells NACDLGM: 'Homosexuality is Sinful' |last=Gilbert |first=Kathleen |date=September 29, 2008 |website=Catholic Online |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080930122028/http://www.catholic.org/national/national_story.php?id=29699 |archive-date=30 September 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/religion/news/2010/12/08/8822/what-are-religious-texts-really-saying-about-gay-and-transgender-rights/ |title=What are Religious Texts Really Saying about Gay and Transgender Rights? |last1=Robinson |first1=Gene |last2=Krehely |first2=Jeff |last3=Steenland |first3=Sally |date=December 8, 2010 |website=Center for American Progress |access-date=March 30, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.news24.com/news24/xarchive/voices/the-story-of-sodom-and-gomorrah-was-not-about-homosexuality-20180719 |title=The Story of Sodom and Gomorrah was NOT About Homosexuality |last=Modisane |first=Cameron |date=November 15, 2014 |website=News24 |access-date=March 30, 2021}}</ref> However, the status of LGBT people in [[early Christianity]]<ref>{{cite book |author-last=Doerfler |author-first=Maria E. |year=2016 |orig-date=2014 |chapter=Coming Apart at the Seams: Cross-dressing, Masculinity, and the Social Body in Late Antiquity |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7fsoDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA37 |editor1-last=Upson-Saia |editor1-first=Kristi |editor2-last=Daniel-Hughes |editor2-first=Carly |editor3-last=Batten |editor3-first=Alicia J. |title=Dressing Judeans and Christians in Antiquity |location=[[London]] and [[New York City|New York]] |publisher=[[Routledge]] |edition=1st |pages=37–51 |doi=10.4324/9781315578125-9 |isbn=9780367879334 |lccn=2014000554 |oclc=921583924 |s2cid=165559811}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author-last=Hunter |author-first=David G. |year=2015 |chapter=Celibacy Was "Queer": Rethinking Early Christianity |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VgDSBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA13 |editor1-last=Talvacchia |editor1-first=Kathleen T. |editor2-last=Pettinger |editor2-first=Michael F. |editor3-last=Larrimore |editor3-first=Mark |title=Queer Christianities: Lived Religion in Transgressive Forms |location=[[New York City|New York]] and [[London]] |publisher=[[NYU Press]] |pages=13–24 |isbn=9781479851812 |jstor=j.ctt13x0q0q.6 |lccn=2014025201 |s2cid=152944605}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Frost|first=Natasha|date=2018-03-02|title=A Modern Controversy Over Ancient Homosexuality|url=http://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/john-boswell-homosexuality-catholicism-history|access-date=2021-04-24|website=Atlas Obscura|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=McClain|first=Lisa|title=A thousand years ago, the Catholic Church paid little attention to homosexuality|url=http://theconversation.com/a-thousand-years-ago-the-catholic-church-paid-little-attention-to-homosexuality-112830|access-date=2021-04-24|website=The Conversation|date=10 April 2019 |language=en}}</ref> and [[Early history of Islam|early Islam]]<ref>{{cite book |author-last=Geissinger |author-first=Ash |year=2021 |chapter=Applying Gender and Queer Theory to Pre-modern sources |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ABYHEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA101 |editor-last=Howe |editor-first=Justine |title=The Routledge Handbook of Islam and Gender |location=[[London]] and [[New York City|New York]] |publisher=[[Routledge]] |edition=1st |pages=101–115 |doi=10.4324/9781351256568-6 |isbn=978-1-351-25656-8 |s2cid=224909490}}</ref><ref name="Schmidtke 1999">{{cite journal |last=Schmidtke |first=Sabine |author-link=Sabine Schmidtke |date=June 1999 |title=Homoeroticism and Homosexuality in Islam: A Review Article |journal=Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies (University of London) |location=[[Cambridge]] |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |volume=62 |issue=2 |pages=260–266 |doi=10.1017/S0041977X00016700 |eissn=1474-0699 |issn=0041-977X |jstor=3107489 |s2cid=170880292}}</ref><ref name="Islamic Homosexualities">{{cite book |author-last=Murray |author-first=Stephen O. |author-link=Stephen O. Murray |year=1997 |chapter=The Will Not to Know: Islamic Accommodations of Male Homosexuality |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6Zw-AAAAQBAJ&pg=PA14 |editor1-last=Murray |editor1-first=Stephen O. |editor2-last=Roscoe |editor2-first=Will |title=[[Islamic Homosexualities|Islamic Homosexualities: Culture, History, and Literature]] |location=[[New York City|New York]] and [[London]] |publisher=[[NYU Press]] |pages=14–54 |doi=10.18574/nyu/9780814761083.003.0004|isbn=9780814774687 |jstor=j.ctt9qfmm4 |oclc=35526232 |s2cid=141668547}}</ref><ref name="TEOEM">{{cite journal |last=Rowson |first=Everett K. |author-link=Everett K. Rowson |title=The Effeminates of Early Medina |journal=[[Journal of the American Oriental Society]] |publisher=[[American Oriental Society]] |volume=111 |issue=4 |pages=671–693 |date=October 1991 |url=http://www.williamapercy.com/wiki/images/The_effeminates_of_early_medina.pdf |doi=10.2307/603399 |issn=0003-0279 |jstor=603399 |citeseerx=10.1.1.693.1504 |lccn=12032032 |oclc=47785421 |s2cid=163738149 |access-date=7 November 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081001195534/http://www.williamapercy.com/wiki/images/The_effeminates_of_early_medina.pdf |archive-date=1 October 2008 |url-status=dead}}</ref> is debated.

===Baháʼí Faith===
{{see also|Baháʼí views on homosexuality}}
{{Expand section|date=August 2018}}
In the [[Baháʼí Faith]], sexual relationships are permitted only between a husband and wife, and [[Baháʼí marriage|marriage]] is emphasized in the faith.<ref name=Bahai>{{cite book |last=Hartz |first=Paula |date=2009 |title=World Religions: Baha'i Faith |edition=3rd |url=https://bahai-library.com/pdf/h/hartz_bahai_faith.pdf |publisher=[[Chelsea House Publishers]] |location=New York City |isbn=978-1-60413-104-8|pages=90–92}}</ref> [[Bahá'u'lláh]], the founder of the Baháʼí Faith, forbade any sexual intercourse outside a heterosexual marriage in his book of laws; the [[Kitáb-i-Aqdas]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Ghaemmaghami |first=Omid |url=https://www.google.com/books/edition/_/d_Y7EQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0 |title=Exploring the Kitáb-i-Aqdas: The Laws and Teachings of the Bahá’í Faith |last2=Vafai |first2=Shahin |date=2025-01-23 |publisher=[[Bloomsbury Publishing]] |isbn=978-0-7556-0626-9 |pages=270, 380}}</ref><ref name="notes">{{cite book |author = Universal House of Justice |year = 1992 |title = The Kitáb-i-Aqdas |publisher = Baháʼí Publishing Trust |location = Wilmette, Illinois, USA |isbn = 978-0-85398-999-8 |url = http://reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/KA/ka-53.html | page = 191}}</ref><ref name="kiq">{{cite book |author = Bahá'u'lláh |author-link = Bahá'u'lláh |orig-year = 1873 |year = 1992 |title = The Kitáb-i-Aqdas |publisher = Baháʼí Publishing Trust |location = Wilmette, Illinois, USA |isbn = 978-0-85398-999-8 | page = 26 |url = http://reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/KA/ka-4.html#gr19 }}</ref> Homosexual sexual relationships and same-sex marriages continue to be prohibited.<ref>{{cite news|agency=[[Religion Unplugged]]|date=1 July 2022|last=Carlos|first=Iain|title=Meet A Baha'i Activist Pushing For LGBTQ Tolerance In His Faith|url=https://religionunplugged.com/news/2022/7/1/meet-a-bahai-activist-pushing-for-lgbtq-tolerance-in-his-faith|location=Dallas, Texas, USA}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Snow|first=Nicholas|date=23 April 2015|newspaper=[[HuffPost]]|url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/brokenhearted-bahais-lgbt_b_7111164|title=Brokenhearted Bahá'is: LGBTs Rejected by Their Faith}}</ref>

===Christianity===
{{main category|Sexuality in Christianity}}
{{See also|Fornication|Christianity and sexual orientation|Homosexuality and Christianity|Phallic saints}}
The [[Old Testament]] and [[Christianity]] have historically affirmed and endorsed a [[Patriarchy|patriarchal]] and [[Heteronormativity|heteronormative]] approach toward [[human sexuality]],<ref name="Mbuwayesango 2016"/><ref name="Leeming 2003"/> favouring exclusively [[Heterosexual intercourse|penetrative vaginal intercourse between men and women]] within the boundaries of [[marriage]] over all other forms of [[human sexual activity]],<ref name="Mbuwayesango 2016"/><ref name="Leeming 2003"/> including [[autoeroticism]], [[masturbation]], [[anal sex]], [[oral sex]], [[Non-penetrative sex|non-penetrative]] and [[Homosexual sexual practices|non-heterosexual]] sexual intercourse (all of which have been labeled as "[[sodomy]]" at various times),<ref name="Sauer 2015 74–78"/> believing and teaching that such behaviors are forbidden because they're considered [[sin]]ful,<ref name="Mbuwayesango 2016"/><ref name="Leeming 2003"/> and further compared to or derived from the behavior of the alleged residents of [[Sodom and Gomorrah]].<ref name="Gnuse 2015">{{cite journal |last=Gnuse |first=Robert K. |date=May 2015 |title=Seven Gay Texts: Biblical Passages Used to Condemn Homosexuality |journal=[[Biblical Theology Bulletin]] |publisher=[[SAGE Publications]] on behalf of Biblical Theology Bulletin Inc. |volume=45 |issue=2 |pages=68–87 |doi=10.1177/0146107915577097 |issn=1945-7596 |s2cid=170127256}}</ref><ref name="Mbuwayesango 2016"/>

In the [[New Testament]], [[Jesus]] discussed little about [[Sexual intercourse|sex]], and most of the information about sex comes from the [[Old Testament]] and [[Pauline epistles|Paul's writings]], and some are controversial today.<ref name="Section I.10 - Human Sexuality">{{cite web|title=Section I.10 - Human Sexuality|url=https://www.anglicancommunion.org/resources/document-library/lambeth-conference/1998/section-i-called-to-full-humanity/section-i10-human-sexuality|website=anglicancommunion.org|access-date=4 January 2020}}</ref>

Sexuality carried out between [[Heterosexuality|different sexes]], between 2 people ([[Monogamy]], although [[Polygamy in Christianity|polygamy]] is not forbidden) and in particular [[procreation]], is generally understood as the ideal state.<ref>Tuovinen, Liisa (Sexuality in Different Cultures, 2008), p. 15.</ref><ref name=BOS>{{Cite book |last=Boswell |first=John |title=The Marriage of Likeness: Same-Sex Unions in Pre-Modern Europe |publisher=Fontana |year=1996 |isbn=9780006863267 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I3MiAQAAMAAJ |access-date=April 20, 2021}}</ref>

There is [[conjugal love]] through ''[[Song of Songs]]'' in which it is about [[eroticism]] and [[Romance (love)|romance]].<ref>Guy Bechtel, The Four Women of God, Zeta Editorial, ISBN 978-84- 96778 -78-8</ref>

====New Testament====
{{see also|The Bible and homosexuality}}

[[Paul the Apostle]] stated in [[First Epistle to the Corinthians|1 Corinthians]] "To the unmarried and the widows I say that it is well for them to remain unmarried as I am. But if they are not practising self-control, they should marry. For it is better to marry than to be aflame with passion."<ref>{{bibleverse|1 Corinthians|7:8–9|NRSV}}</ref> Importantly, Paul's view of sex is also that it is actually unnecessary for those with certain gifts<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Corinthians%207&version=NIV|title=Bible Gateway passage: 1 Corinthians 7 – New International Version|website=Bible Gateway}}</ref> (presumably [[Celibacy#Christianity|"celibacy"]]). [[Jennifer Wright Knust]] says Paul framed desire a force Christians gained control over whereas non-Christians were "enslaved" by it.<ref name="Knust2005">{{cite book|author=Jennifer Wright Knust|author-link=Jennifer Knust|title=Abandoned to Lust: Sexual Slander and Ancient Christianity|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2AUEAmdWwuUC&pg=PA1|date=9 November 2005|publisher=Columbia University Press|isbn=978-0-231-51004-2|pages=51, 67, 78}}</ref> Further, Paul says the bodies of Christians were members of [[Body of Christ|Christ's body]] and thus sexual desire must be eschewed.<ref name="Knust2005" />

New Testament scholar [[N. T. Wright]] asserts that Paul absolutely forbade fornication, irrespective of a new Christian's former cultural practices. Wright notes "If a Corinthian were to say, 'Because I'm a Corinthian, I have always had a string of girl-friends I sleep with, that's part of our culture,' Paul would respond, 'Not now you're a Christian you don't.'... When someone disagreed with Paul's clear rules on immorality or angry disputes, the matters he deals with in Colossians 3.5–10, he is... firm, as we see dramatically in 1 Corinthians 5 and 6. There is no place in the Christian fellowship for such practices and for such a person."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ntwrightpage.com/Wright_Communion_Koinonia.htm |title=Communion and Koinonia: Pauline Reflections on Tolerance and Boundaries |website=Ntwrightpage.com |date=12 July 2016 |access-date=2017-06-30}}</ref>

Some have suggested that Paul's treatment of sex was influenced by his conviction that the [[Christian eschatology|end of the world]] was imminent. Under this view, Paul, believing that the world would soon end, took it as a corollary that all earthly concerns,<ref name="biblegateway1">{{cite web|url=http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Corinthians%207 |title=1 Corinthians 7 – Concerning Married Life – Now for the |publisher=Bible Gateway |access-date=2017-06-30}}</ref> including sex, should hold little interest for Christians.<ref>{{harvp|Brundage|1987|pp=59–61}}</ref> [[Pauline epistles|Paul's letters]] show far greater concern with sexual issues than the gospel writers attributed to Jesus, since Paul was building Christian communities over decades and responding to various issues that arose.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Church at Corinth |url=https://www.bibleodyssey.org/en/places/related-articles/church-at-corinth |access-date=2022-07-25 |website=bibleodyssey.org |archive-date=2022-07-25 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220725181324/https://www.bibleodyssey.org/en/places/related-articles/church-at-corinth |url-status=dead }}</ref>

The theologian Lee Gatiss states that "the word 'fornication' has gone out of fashion and is not in common use to describe non-marital sex. However, it is an excellent translation for [the Biblical term] {{Lang|grc-Latn|porneíā}}, which basically referred to any kind of sex outside of marriage... This has been contested... but the overwhelming weight of scholarship and all the available evidence from the ancient world points firmly in this direction. 'Flee sexual immorality ({{Lang|grc-Latn|porneíā}}) and pursue self-control' (cf. 1 Thess 4:1–8) was the straightforward message to Christians in a sex-crazed world."<ref name="theologian.org.uk">{{cite web |title=The Issue of Pre-Marital Sex |author=Lee Gatiss |publisher=The Theologian |year=2005 |url=http://www.theologian.org.uk/pastoralia/premartialsex.html}}</ref>

====Early Christianity====
In [[early Christianity]], reflection on scriptural texts introduced an [[eschatological]] [[hermeneutic]] to the reading of the [[Book of Genesis]]. The [[Garden of Eden]] was seen as a normative ideal state to which Christians were to strive; writers linked the future enjoyment of [[Heaven]] to the original blessedness of Adam and Eve in their reflections.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Anderson |first1=Gary |title=Celibacy or Consummation in the Garden? Reflections on Early Jewish and Christian Interpretations of the Garden of Eden |journal=Harvard Theological Review |date=April 1989 |volume=82 |issue=2 |pages=121–148 |doi=10.1017/S0017816000016084 |s2cid=161371876 }}</ref>

The valuation of [[virginity]] in the ancient church brought into relief a tension between the Genesis injunction to "be fruitful and multiply"<ref>{{bibleverse|Genesis|1:28}}</ref> with its understood contextual implication of marriage as a social institution, and the interpretation of the superiority of virginity over marriage, sexual activity and family formation from the Gospel texts [https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=mt+19%3A11-12&version=NIV Matt 19:11-12], [https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+19:29&version=NIV Matt 19:29]. One way patristic thinkers tried to harmonize the texts was through the position that there had actually been no sexual intercourse in Eden: on this reading, sex happened after the [[fall of man]] and the expulsion from Eden, thus preserving virginity as the perfect state both in the historical [[Paradise]] and the anticipated Heaven. [[John Chrysostom]], [[Gregory of Nyssa]], [[Justin Martyr]], [[Epiphanius of Salamis]], and [[Irenaeus of Lyons]] all espoused this view:
* [[Gregory of Nyssa]], ''On Virginity'', 12 "He did not yet judge of what was lovely by taste or sight; he found in the Lord alone all that was sweet; and he used the helpmeet given him only for this delight, as Scripture signifies when it said that 'he knew her not' till he was driven forth from the garden, and till she, for the sin which she was decoyed into committing, was sentenced to the pangs of childbirth. We, then, who in our first ancestor were thus ejected, are allowed to return to our earliest state of blessedness by the very same stages by which we lost Paradise. What are they? Pleasure, craftily offered, began the Fall, and there followed after pleasure shame, and fear, even to remain longer in the sight of their Creator, so that they hid themselves in leaves and shade; and after that they covered themselves with the skins of dead animals; and then were sent forth into this pestilential and exacting land where, as the compensation for having to die, marriage was instituted".<ref>St. Gregory of Nyssa, "{{Lang|grc-Latn|Contra fornicarios oratio}}," trans. by William Moore & Henry Austin Wilson, in Philip Schaff & Henry Wace, eds., ''Nicene & Post-Nicene Fathers'', Second Series № 5 (Buffalo, N.Y.: Christian Literature Publishing, 1893) [revised & edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight (2017), "[http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2907.htm Church Fathers: On Virginity]," accessed 2019‑10‑07].</ref>
* [[John Chrysostom]], ''On Virginity'', 14.3 "When the whole world had been completed and all had been readied for our repose and use, God fashioned man for whom he made the world... Man did need a helper, and she came into being; not even then did marriage seem necessary... Desire for sexual intercourse, conception, labor, childbirth, and every form of corruption had been banished from their souls. As a clear river shooting forth from a pure source, so they were in that place adorned by virginity." 15.2 "Why did marriage not appear before the treachery? Why was there no intercourse in paradise? Why not the pains of childbirth before the curse? Because at that time these things were superfluous."<ref>{{harvp|Miller|2005|p=290}}.</ref>
* [[Irenaeus]], ''[[Against Heresies]]'', Book 3, ch 22:4 "But Eve was disobedient; for she did not obey when as yet she was a virgin. And even as she, having indeed a husband, Adam, but being nevertheless as yet a virgin (for in Paradise they were both naked, and were not ashamed, inasmuch as they, having been created a short time previously, had no understanding of the procreation of children: for it was necessary that they should first come to adult age, and then multiply from that time onward), having become disobedient, was made the cause of death, both to herself and to the entire human race..."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103322.htm |title=CHURCH FATHERS: Against Heresies, III.22 (St. Irenaeus) |website=Newadvent.org |access-date=2017-06-30}}</ref>
* [[Epiphanius of Salamis]], ''[[Panarion]]'', 78.17–19 "And as in paradise Eve, still a virgin, fell into the sin of disobedience, once more through the Virgin [Mary] came the obedience of grace."<ref>{{harvp|Miller|2005|p=293}}</ref>
* [[Justin Martyr]], ''[[Dialogue with Trypho]]'', ch 100 "For Eve, who was a virgin and undefiled, having conceived the word of the serpent, brought forth disobedience and death. But the Virgin Mary received faith and joy, when the angel Gabriel announced the good tidings to her..."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/01287.htm |title=CHURCH FATHERS: Dialogue with Trypho, Chapters 89-108 (Justin Martyr) |website=Newadvent.org |access-date=2017-06-30}}</ref>

Prof. John Noonan suggests that "if one asks... where the Christian Fathers derived their notions on marital intercourse – notions which have no express biblical basis – the answer must be, chiefly from the [[Stoics]]".<ref name="Noonan_68">{{harvp|Noonan|1965|p=68}}</ref> He uses texts from [[Musonius Rufus]], [[Seneca the Younger]], and [[Ocellus Lucanus]], tracing works of [[Clement of Alexandria]], [[Origen]] and [[Jerome]] to the works of these earlier thinkers,<ref name="Noonan_68"/> particularly as pertaining to the permissible use of the sexual act, which in the Stoic model must be subdued, dispassionate, and justified by its procreative [[intent]].<ref>{{harvp|Noonan|1965|pp=67–68}}</ref>

[[Augustine of Hippo]] had a different challenge: to respond to the errors of [[Manichaeism]].<ref name="Noonan, John Thomas p. 169">{{harvp|Noonan|1965|p=169}}</ref> The Manichees, according to Augustine, were "opposed to marriage, because they are opposed to procreation which is the purpose of marriage".<ref name="Noonan, John Thomas p. 169"/> "The method of [[contraception]] practised by these Manichees whom Augustine knew is the use of the sterile period as determined by Greek medicine",<ref name="Noonan, John Thomas p. 169"/> which Augustine condemns (this stands in contrast to the contemporarily permitted Catholic use of [[Natural family planning]]). [[Elaine Pagels]] says, "By the beginning of the fifth century, Augustine had actually declared that spontaneous sexual desire is the proof of—and penalty for—universal original sin", though that this view goes against "most of his Christian predecessors".<ref name="Pagels2011">{{cite book|author=Elaine Pagels|title=Adam, Eve, and the Serpent: Sex and Politics in Early Christianity|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=btufm2vXzpEC&pg=PR17|date=5 October 2011|publisher=Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group|isbn=978-0-307-80735-9|pages=xvii-xix}}</ref>

As monastic communities developed, the sexual lives of monks came under scrutiny from two theologians, [[John Cassian]] and [[Caesarius of Arles]], who commented on the "vices" of the solitary life. "Their concerns were not with the act of masturbation, but with the monks who vowed chastity. The monks' vow made masturbation an illicit act; the act itself was not considered sinful...  In fact... prior to Cassian, masturbation was not considered a sexual offence for anyone."<ref name="Keenan2010">{{cite book|last=Keenan |first=James F. |author-link=James F. Keenan|title=A History of Catholic Moral Theology in the Twentieth Century: From Confessing Sins to Liberating Consciences|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KWbtc5XPMw0C&pg=PA45|date=17 January 2010|publisher=A&C Black|isbn=978-0-8264-2929-2|page=45}}</ref>

====Catholicism====
{{Main|Catholic theology of sexuality}}
{{See also|Theology of the Body|Christian views on masturbation}}
From the beginning of the thirteenth century, the Catholic Church formally recognized [[Fruit of the Holy Spirit|marriage between a freely consenting, baptized man and woman]] as a [[sacrament]] – an outward sign communicating a special gift of God's love. The [[Council of Florence]] in 1438 gave this definition, following earlier church statements in 1208, and declared that sexual union was a special participation in the union of Christ in the church.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09707a.htm |title=CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Sacrament of Marriage |website=Newadvent.org |date=1910-10-01 |access-date=2017-06-30}}</ref> However the [[Puritans]], while highly valuing the institution, viewed marriage as a "civil", rather than a "religious" matter, being "under the jurisdiction of the civil courts".<ref name="Feige, Diana 1995 P109">{{cite journal |last1=Feige |first1=Diana |first2=Franz G M. |last2=Feige |title=Love, Marriage, and Family in Puritan Society |journal=Dialogue & Alliance |volume=9 |issue=1 |date=1 March 1995 |pages=96–114 }}</ref> This is because they found no biblical precedent for clergy performing marriage ceremonies. Further, marriage was said to be for the "relief of [[concupiscence]]"<ref name="Feige, Diana 1995 P109"/> as well as any spiritual purpose.

The Catholic moral theologian [[Charles Curran (theologian)|Charles E. Curran]] stated "the fathers of the Church are practically silent on the simple question of masturbation".<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=T08zZBoY7uYC&q=the+fathers+of+the+Church+are+pratically+silent+on+the+simple+question+of+masturbation&pg=PA59 |title=Christians, Feminists, and the Culture of Pornography |author=Arthur J. Mielke |page=59 |access-date=2017-06-30|isbn=9780819197658 |year=1995 |publisher=University Press of America }}</ref>

The ''[[Catechism of the Catholic Church]]'' teaches that "the flesh is the hinge of salvation".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.usccb.org/catechism/text/pt1sect2chpt3art11.htm#1015 |title=Catechism |website=Usccb.org |date=2015-08-14 |access-date=2017-06-30 |archive-date=2008-08-21 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080821172548/http://www.usccb.org/catechism/text/pt1sect2chpt3art11.htm#1015 |url-status=dead }}</ref> The ''Catechism'' indicates that sexual relationships in marriage is "a way of imitating in the flesh the Creator's generosity and fecundity"<ref>{{Cite CCC|2.1|2335}}</ref> and lists fornication as one of the "offenses against chastity",<ref name=":0">{{Cite CCC|2.1|2352}}</ref> calling it "an intrinsically and gravely disordered action" because "use of the sexual faculty, for whatever reason, outside of marriage is essentially contrary to its purpose".<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{cite web
 | title = Persona Humana:Declaration on Certain Questions Concerning Sexual Ethics, Section IX
 | work = Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
 |date=December 29, 1975
 | url = http://www.newadvent.org/library/docs_df75se.htm
 | access-date = 2006-08-29 }}</ref> The "conjugal act" aims "at a deeply personal unity, a unity that, beyond union in one flesh, leads to forming one heart and soul"<ref>{{Cite CCC|2.1|1643}}</ref> since the marriage bond is to be a sign of the love between God and humanity.<ref>{{Cite CCC|2.1|1617}}</ref>

[[Pope John Paul II]]'s first major teaching was on the [[Catholic theology of the body|theology of the body]], presented in a series of [[Theology of the Body|lectures by the same name]]. Over the course of five years he elucidated a vision of sex that was not only positive and affirming but was about redemption, not condemnation. He taught that by understanding God's plan for physical love we could understand "the meaning of the whole of existence, the meaning of life."<ref>{{cite web |title=General Audience, 6 |url=http://www.ewtn.com/library/PAPALDOC/jp2tb45.htm |author=Pope John Paul II |date=29 October 1980 |publisher=L'Osservatore Romano |access-date=2006-09-15}}</ref> He taught that human beings were created by a loving God for a purpose: to be loving persons who freely choose to love, to give themselves as persons who express their self-giving through their bodies. Thus, sexual intercourse between husband and wife is a [[symbol]] of their total mutual self-donation.{{Original research inline|date=June 2016}}

For John Paul II, "The body, and it alone, is capable of making visible what is invisible: the spiritual and divine." He says there is no other more perfect [[image]] of the unity and communion of God in mutual love than the sexual act of a married couple, whereby they give themselves in a total way – exclusively to one another, and up to the end of their lives, and in a fruitfully generous way by participating in the [[Insemination|creation]] of new human beings. Through this perspective, he understands the immorality of extra-marital sex. It falsifies the language of the human body, a language of total love worthy of persons by using the body for selfish ends, thus treating persons as things and objects, rather than dealing with embodied persons with the reverence and love that incarnate spirits deserve. John Paul II stresses that there is great [[beauty]] in sexual love when done in [[harmony]] with the human values of freely chosen total commitment and self-giving. For him, this sexual love is a form of [[worship]], an experience of the [[sacred]].<ref>Theology of Marriage and Celibacy, Boston, St. Paul Books and Media 1986</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.catholiceducation.org/en/marriage-and-family/sexuality/the-pope-s-theology-of-the-body.html | author=Christopher West | work=Catholic Education Resource Center | title=John Paul II's Theology of the Body | access-date=2009-09-29 }}</ref>

Roman Catholics believe that masturbation is a sin.<ref name="Cardinal2005">{{cite web|url=https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19751229_persona-humana_en.html|title=Persona Humana: Declaration on certain questions concerning sexual ethics|last=Cardinal Seper|first=Franjo|date=2005-12-29|publisher=The Roman Curia|work=§ IX|access-date=2008-07-23}}</ref>

In September 2015, the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, responsible for enforcing Catholic doctrine, did not permit a transgender man in Spain to serve as a godfather effectively barring transgender Catholics from serving as a baptismal sponsors. The statement concluded: "[...] the result is evident that this person does not possess the requisite of leading a life conformed to the faith and to the position of godfather (CIC, can 874 §1,3), therefore is not able to be admitted to the position of godmother nor godfather. One should not see this as discrimination, but only the recognition of an objective absence of the requisites that by their nature are necessary to assume the ecclesial responsibility of being a godparent."<ref>{{Cite web |title=Stances of Faiths on LGBTQ Issues: Roman Catholic Church |url=https://www.hrc.org/resources/stances-of-faiths-on-lgbt-issues-roman-catholic-church |access-date=2022-05-10 |website=Human Rights Campaign |language=en-US}}</ref>

====Protestantism====
{{main|Fornication#Mainstream Protestantism}}
[[File:United States Adultery Laws Enacted by Year by State.svg|thumb|Laws against [[adultery]] in the United States in 1996 and when these laws were enacted]]
Views over sexuality in [[Protestantism|Protestant]] churches differ.

Conservative Protestants assert that any and all sex outside of marriage, including that conducted between committed, engaged or cohabiting couples, is the sin of fornication.<ref>{{cite book |title=Luther on Women|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BE8yAl6K0tQC&q=sex|author=Susan C. Karant-Nunn and Merry E. Wiesner-Hanks|access-date=5 June 2014|page=11|year=2003|publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-65884-3 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Helm|first=Paul|title=Sex, Marriage, and Family in John Calvin's Geneva, Volume 1: Courtship, Engagement, and Marriage|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IlWH2jHaj1YC&q=john+calvin+cohabitation&pg=PA417|publisher=Reformation21|access-date=3 October 2014|date=July 2006|isbn=9780802848031}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://oratoiredulouvre.fr/faq/sexualite-et-foi.php|title=xxx|first=Marc Pernot, pasteur de l'Eglise Protestante Unie de|last=France|access-date=17 September 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160920143847/https://oratoiredulouvre.fr/faq/sexualite-et-foi.php|archive-date=20 September 2016|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://oratoiredulouvre.fr/faq/j-ai-du-mal-a-trouver-la-paix-apres-une-aventure-avec-un-homme-qui-ne-m-aimait-pas.php|title=J'ai du mal à trouver la paix après une aventure avec un homme qui ne m'aimait pas ?|first=Marc Pernot, pasteur de l'Eglise Protestante Unie de|last=France|access-date=17 September 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160920144451/https://oratoiredulouvre.fr/faq/j-ai-du-mal-a-trouver-la-paix-apres-une-aventure-avec-un-homme-qui-ne-m-aimait-pas.php|archive-date=20 September 2016|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=A Social Statement on Human Sexuality: Gift and Trust |date=19 August 2009 |publisher=Evangelical Lutheran Church in America |url=http://download.elca.org/ELCA%20Resource%20Repository/SexualitySS.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221010/http://download.elca.org/ELCA%20Resource%20Repository/SexualitySS.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-10 |url-status=live}}</ref>

Unlike Roman Catholics, certain Protestants do not disapprove of [[Christian views on masturbation#Protestantism|masturbation]] due to the lack of a Biblical injunction against the act, including mainline<ref>{{cite web|url=http://fragen.evangelisch.de/frage/3072/position-zur-masturbation |title=Position zur Masturbation |language=de|website=Fragen.evangelisch.de |date=2013-05-30 |access-date=2017-06-30}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Reaction to sex report pours in on Lutherans |journal=National Catholic Reporter |volume=30 |issue=3 |date=November 1993 |page=12 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.pcusa.org/get/resources/resource/12036/ |title=Presbyterians and Human Sexuality 1991 |website=Pcusa.org |access-date=2017-06-30 |archive-date=2022-01-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220116044227/https://www.pcusa.org/site_media/media/uploads/_resolutions/human-sexuality1991.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> and conservative denominations.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://christianity.net.au/questions/masturbation-a-sin |title=Is masturbation a sin? {{pipe}} Questions & Answers |website=Christianity.net.au |access-date=2017-06-30 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170701183001/http://christianity.net.au/questions/masturbation-a-sin |archive-date=2017-07-01 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Among those Protestants who do not view masturbation as being sinful, there are various restrictions, such as making sure it does not lead to use of pornography or looking lustfully at people or mutual masturbation or addiction to the act. It must also not be undertaken in a spirit of defiance against God.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://oratoiredulouvre.fr/faq/la-masturbation-est-elle-un-peche.php |title=La masturbation est-elle un péché ? |website=Oratoiredulouvre.fr |access-date=2017-06-30 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170707062047/https://oratoiredulouvre.fr/faq/la-masturbation-est-elle-un-peche.php |archive-date=2017-07-07 |url-status=dead }}</ref>

===== Lutheran and Reformed churches =====
The [[Confessional Lutheran]] tradition, which includes several denominations worldwide (such as the [[Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod]]) takes a traditional stance towards human sexuality, teaching that "God created male and female, sexual human beings".<ref name="Sonnenberg2013">{{cite web |last1=Sonnenberg |first1=Roger |title=The Gift of Sexuality |url=https://files.lcms.org/file/preview/y0hee6DUKO7K2yXDxveNoiXdEcvSQ4og |publisher=[[Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod]] |access-date=12 December 2024 |language=en |date=2013}}</ref> Confessional Lutherans hold that "Upon creating man and women and the rest of creation, God observed that 'it (was) good,' including the gift of sex."<ref name="Sonnenberg2013"/> The Confessional Lutheran denominations view "pornography, homosexuality and cohabitation" as sinful.<ref name="Sonnenberg2013"/>

All 20 [[Lutheranism|Lutheran]] and [[Calvinism|Reformed]] churches of the [[Evangelical Church in Germany]] welcome LGBT members,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ekd.de/lebensgemeinschaft_2000.html |title=Verläßlichkeit und Verantwortung stärken |language=German |date=2000}}</ref> as well as the [[Protestant Church in the Netherlands]].<ref name="brunne" /> In these Lutheran and Reformed churches gay ministers are permitted in ministry and gay married couples are allowed in their churches.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de/eine-neue-evangelische-sexualethik.1278.de.html?dram:article_id=225003|title=- Eine neue evangelische Sexualethik|website=Deutschlandfunk Kultur|date=20 October 2012 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url = https://www.zeit.de/gesellschaft/zeitgeschehen/2015-08/sexualitaet-evangelische-kirche-ekd-grundsatzerklaerung| title = Zeit.de: Sex auf Evangelisch (german), 2015| newspaper = Die Zeit| date = 8 August 2015| last1 = Welt| first1 = Christ &.}}</ref>

Inside the Lutheran [[Church of Sweden]], the Bishop of Stockholm, [[Eva Brunne]] is a [[lesbian]] in a registered partnership with Gunilla Lindén, who is also an ordained priest of the Church of Sweden.<ref name="brunne">{{Cite web |url=http://www.episcopalchurch.org/81808_116555_ENG_HTM.htm |title=SWEDEN: Lesbian priest ordained as Lutheran bishop of Stockholm. Episcopal News Service. |access-date=2011-06-24 |archive-date=January 2, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100102013508/http://www.episcopalchurch.org/81808_116555_ENG_HTM.htm |url-status=dead}}</ref>

===== Anglicanism =====
The [[Anglicanism|Anglican Church]] upholds human sexuality as a gift from a loving God, designed to be between a man and a woman in a monogamous, lifetime union of marriage. It also recognises singleness and dedicated celibacy as Christ-like. It reassures people with same-sex attraction they are loved by God, and are welcomed as full members of the [[Body of Christ]]. The church leadership has a variety of views in regard to homosexual expression and ordination. Some expressions of sexuality are considered sinful, including "promiscuity, prostitution, incest, pornography, paedophilia, predatory sexual behaviour, and sadomasochism (all of which may be heterosexual and homosexual), adultery, violence against wives, and female circumcision." The church is concerned with pressures on young people to engage sexually and encourages abstinence.<ref name="Section I.10 - Human Sexuality"/>

In the Anglican Church, there is a large discussion over the blessing of gay couples, and over tolerance of homosexuality. The discussion is more about the aspect of love between two people of the same-sex in a relationship than it is about the sexual aspect of a relationship.<ref name="Vernon">{{cite journal|last1=Vernon|first1=Mark|title=A church at war: Anglicans and homosexuality|journal=Theology & Sexuality|date=January 2006|pages=220–222}}</ref>

===== Methodism =====
The [[Free Methodist Church]] teaches:<ref name="FMC2020"/>
{{quotation|Sexual intercourse is God’s gift to humanity, for the intimate union of a man and woman within marriage. In this relationship, it is to be celebrative (Hebrews 13:4). Marriage, between one man and one woman, is therefore the only proper setting for sexual intimacy. Scripture requires purity before and faithfulness within and following marriage.<ref name="FMC2020">{{cite web |title=Sanctified Sexuality |url=https://fmcusa.org/wp-content/uploads/PP-FMCUSA-Sanctified-Sexuality.pdf |publisher=[[Free Methodist Church]] |access-date=12 December 2024 |language=English |date=27 February 2020}}</ref>}}
The [[Allegheny Wesleyan Methodist Connection]] teaches: "We believe that God has commanded that no intimate sexual activity be engaged in outside of marriage between a man and a woman."<ref name="AWMC2014">{{cite book|title=The Discipline of the Allegheny Wesleyan Methodist Connection (Original Allegheny Conference)|year=2014|publisher=[[Allegheny Wesleyan Methodist Connection]]|location=[[Salem, Ohio|Salem]]|language=en|pages=21}}</ref> It additionally holds that those who remarry after divorce are living in a state of adultery.<ref name="AWMC2014"/>

The [[United Methodist Church]] permits its clergy to officiate same-sex weddings.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |title=What is the Church's position on homosexuality? |url=https://www.umc.org/en/content/ask-the-umc-what-is-the-churchs-position-on-homosexuality |access-date=2022-09-20 |website=The United Methodist Church |language=en}}</ref>

=====Metropolitan Community Church=====
The [[Metropolitan Community Church]], also known as the Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches, has a specific outreach to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender families and communities.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mccchurch.org |title=Metropolitan Community Churches - The Inclusive Church - All are welcome |website=Mccchurch.org |access-date=2017-06-30}}</ref>

====Latter Day Saints movement====
{{main|Sexuality and Mormonism}}
{{see also|Masturbation and the LDS Church|Homosexuality and the LDS Church|Mormonism and polygamy|Birth control and the LDS Church}}
Within the many branches of the [[Latter Day Saints movement]], the principal denomination, [[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]] (LDS Church), teaches conservative views around [[sexual ethics]] in their [[Law of Chastity]], which holds that masturbation, pre- and extra-marital sex, and same-sex sexual activity are sins. In the mid-1800s, however, it was allowed for men to be married to and have children with several women, and this was also discontinued in the late 1800s.<ref>{{cite web|title=An Ethical Mormon Life|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk:80/religion/religions/mormon/socialvalues/ethics_1.shtml|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161219201706/http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/mormon/socialvalues/ethics_1.shtml|url-status=dead|archive-date=2016-12-19|website=bbc.co.uk|publisher=BBC}}</ref>
<!--https://www.lds.org/topics/the-manifesto-and-the-end-of-plural-marriage?lang=eng-->On various occasions,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Malan |first1=Mark Kim |last2=Bullough |first2=Vern |title=Historical development of new masturbation attitudes in Mormon culture: Silence, secular conformity, counterrevolution, and emerging reform |journal=Sexuality and Culture |date=December 2005 |volume=9 |issue=4 |pages=80–127 |doi=10.1007/s12119-005-1003-z |citeseerx=10.1.1.597.8039 |s2cid=145480822 }}</ref><ref name=TYMO>{{citation|last=Packer |first=Boyd |author-link=Boyd K. Packer |title=To Young Men Only |year=1976 |publisher=LDS Church |url=https://www.lds.org/bc/content/shared/content/english/pdf/language-materials/33382_eng.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160311171249/https://www.lds.org/bc/content/shared/content/english/pdf/language-materials/33382_eng.pdf |archive-date=2016-03-11 }}</ref> LDS Church leaders have taught that members should not masturbate<ref name="1990 FTSOY">{{cite book|title=For the Strength of Youth|date=1990|publisher=The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints|location=Salt Lake City, Utah|edition=7|url=https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/marriage-and-family-relations-instructors-manual/part-b-parents-responsibilities-to-strengthen-families/lesson-14-teaching-gospel-principles-to-children-part-2?lang=eng&clang=tam}}</ref><ref name="KimballOnMorality">{{Citation|last=Kimball|first=Spencer|author-link=Spencer W. Kimball|title=President Kimball Speaks Out on Morality|year=1980|url= https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/ensign/1980/11/president-kimball-speaks-out-on-morality?lang=eng}}</ref><ref name="Miracle">{{Citation|last=Kimball|first=Spencer|author-link=Spencer W. Kimball|title=The Miracle of Forgiveness|year=1969|publisher=[[Bookcraft]]|pages=25, 77–78, 182 |isbn=978-0-88494-192-7|title-link=The Miracle of Forgiveness}}</ref> as part of obedience to the LDS [[law of chastity]].<ref>{{cite web|last1=Featherstone|first1=Vaughn|title=A Self-Inflicted Purging|url=https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/general-conference/1975/04/a-self-inflicted-purging?lang=eng&_r=1|website=ChurchofJesusChrist.org|publisher=LDS Church|access-date=3 February 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=McConkie|first1=Bruce R.|title=Mormon Doctrine|date=1958|pages=610, 708|publisher=Deseret Book}}</ref> The LDS Church believes that sex outside of opposite-sex marriage is sinful, and that any same-sex sexual activity is a serious sin.<ref name="Gay Mormons">{{cite journal |last1=Bradshaw |first1=William S. |last2=Heaton |first2=Tim B. |last3=Decoo |first3=Ellen |last4=Dehlin |first4=John P. |last5=Galliher |first5=Renee V. |last6=Crowell |first6=Katherine A. |title=Religious Experiences of GBTQ Mormon Males: Religious Experiences of GBTQ Mormon Males |journal=Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion |date=May 2015 |volume=54 |issue=2 |pages=311–329 |doi=10.1111/jssr.12181 }}</ref> God is believed to be in a heterosexual marriage with the [[Heavenly Mother (Mormonism)|Heavenly Mother]], and Mormons believe that opposite-sex marriage is what God wants for all his children. Top LDS Church leaders formerly taught that attractions to those of the same sex were a sin or disease that could be changed or fixed,<ref name="Gay Mormons" /> but now have no stance on the etiology<ref>{{cite web|title=Interview With Elder Dallin H. Oaks and Elder Lance B. Wickman: "Same-Gender Attraction"|url=https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/interview-oaks-wickman-same-gender-attraction|website=Mormon Newsroom|publisher=LDS Church|access-date=9 November 2016}} "The Church does not have a position on the causes of any of ... same-gender attraction. Those are scientific questions ... Whether nature or nurture—those are things the Church doesn't have a position on."</ref> of homosexuality, and teach that therapy focused on changing sexual orientation is unethical.<ref>{{cite web|title=Seeking Professional Help|url=https://mormonandgay.churchofjesuschrist.org/articles/seeking-professional-help|website=mormonandgay.lds.org|publisher=LDS Church|access-date=25 May 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190722181608/https://mormonandgay.churchofjesuschrist.org/articles/seeking-professional-help|archive-date=22 July 2019|url-status=dead}} "[I]t is unethical to focus professional treatment on an assumption that a change in sexual orientation will or must occur."</ref> Lesbian, gay, and bisexual members are, thus, left with the option of attempting to [[Sexual orientation change efforts|change their sexual orientation]], entering a [[Mixed-orientation marriage|mixed-orientation opposite-sex marriage]], or living a [[Celibacy|celibate]] lifestyle without any sexual expression (including [[Masturbation and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints|masturbation]]).<ref name="Conservative Christian Identity">{{cite book|last1=Phillips|first1=Rick|title=Conservative Christian Identity & Same-Sex Orientation: The Case of Gay Mormons|date=2005|publisher=Peter Lang Publishing|location=Frankfurt, Germany|isbn=978-0820474809|url=https://www.uvu.edu/religiousstudies/docs/msc_philips_conservative.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170418092803/https://www.uvu.edu/religiousstudies/docs/msc_philips_conservative.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-date=2017-04-18|access-date=31 May 2017}}</ref>{{rp|11}}

The LDS Church teaches that women's principal role is to raise children. Women who rejected this role as being a domestic woman in the home, were seen as unstable and corrupted.<ref name="Dunfey">{{cite journal |last1=Dunfey |first1=Julie |title='Living the Principle' of Plural Marriage: Mormon Women, Utopia, and Female Sexuality in the Nineteenth Century |journal=Feminist Studies |date=1984 |volume=10 |issue=3 |pages=523–536 |doi=10.2307/3178042 |jstor=3178042 |hdl=2027/spo.0499697.0010.312 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> Before 1890, the Mormon leaders taught that polygamy was a way to salvation, and many had multiple wives into the early 1900s, and some women practiced polyandry.<ref name="Dunfey" /><ref>{{cite web|title=Plural Marriage in Kirtland and Nauvoo|url=https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/topics/plural-marriage-in-kirtland-and-nauvoo?lang=eng|website=ChurchofJesusChrist.org|publisher=LDS Church}} See footnote 29.</ref>

The Mormon religion teaches that marriage should be with a man and a woman. The LDS Church teaches its members to obey the law of chastity, which says that "sexual relations are proper only between a man and a woman who are legally and lawfully wedded as husband and wife." Violations of this code include: "adultery, being without natural affection, lustfulness, infidelity, incontinence, filthy communications, impurity, inordinate affection, fornication." The traditional Mormon religion forbids all homosexual behavior, whether it be intra-marriage or extramarital. In Romans 1:24-32, Paul preached to the Romans that homosexual behavior was sinful. In Leviticus 20:13, Moses included in his law that homosexual actions and behaviors were against God's will. In the 1830s, LDS founder, [[Joseph Smith]], instituted the private practice on polygamy. The practice was defended by the church as a matter of religious freedom. In 1890, the church practice was terminated. Since the termination of polygamy, Mormons have solely believed in marriage between two people, and those two people being a man and a woman. The LDS community states that they still love homosexuals as sons and daughters of the Lord, but if they act upon their inclinations, then they are subject to discipline of the church.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Williams|first1=Alan|title=Mormon and Queer at the Crossroads|journal=Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought|date=2011|volume=44|issue=1|pages=53–84,230|doi=10.5406/dialjmormthou.44.1.0053|s2cid=171900135|id={{ProQuest|858948153}}}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Dehlin |first1=John P. |last2=Galliher |first2=Renee V. |last3=Bradshaw |first3=William S. |last4=Crowell |first4=Katherine A. |title=Psychosocial Correlates of Religious Approaches to Same-Sex Attraction: A Mormon Perspective |journal=Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health |date=3 July 2014 |volume=18 |issue=3 |pages=284–311 |doi=10.1080/19359705.2014.912970 |s2cid=144153586 }}</ref>

====Unitarian Universalism====
Several [[Unitarian Universalism|Unitarian Universalist congregations]] have undertaken a series of organizational, procedural, and practical steps to become acknowledged as a "[[Unitarian Universalism and LGBTQ persons#Welcoming Congregation|Welcoming Congregation]]": a congregation which has taken specific steps to welcome and integrate gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) members. UU ministers perform [[same-sex unions]] and now [[same-sex marriages]] where legal (and sometimes when not, as a form of civil protest). On June 29, 1984, the Unitarian Universalists became the first major church "to approve religious blessings on homosexual unions."<ref>{{cite news |title=AROUND THE NATION; Unitarians Endorse Homosexual Marriages |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1984/06/29/us/around-the-nation-unitarians-endorse-homosexual-marriages.html |work=The New York Times |date=29 June 1984 }}</ref>

Unitarian Universalists have been in the forefront of the work to make same-sex marriages legal in their local states and provinces, as well as on the national level. Gay men, bisexuals, and lesbians are also regularly [[ordained]] as ministers, and a number of gay, bisexual, and lesbian ministers have, themselves, now become legally married to their partners. In May 2004, [[Arlington Street Church (Boston)|Arlington Street Church]] was the site of the first state-sanctioned same-sex marriage in the United States. The official stance of the UUA is for the legalization of same-sex marriage—"Standing on the Side of Love." In 2004 UU Minister Rev. Debra Haffner of [[The Religious Institute on Sexual Morality, Justice, and Healing]] published ''An Open Letter on Religious Leaders on Marriage Equality'' to affirm same-sex marriage from a multi-faith perspective. In December 2009, Washington, DC Mayor [[Adrian Fenty]] signed the bill to legalize same-sex marriage for the [[District of Columbia]] in [[All Souls Church, Unitarian (Washington, D.C.)]].

[[Unitarian Universalists for Polyamory Awareness]] is a group within Unitarian Universalism whose vision is "for Unitarian Universalism to become the first [[polyamory|poly]]-welcoming mainstream religious denomination."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.uupa.org/index#mission|title=Our Mission|website=Uupa.org|access-date=2017-06-30|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170918233548/http://www.uupa.org/index#mission|archive-date=2017-09-18|url-status=dead}}</ref>

===Islam===
{{Main|Interfaith marriage in Islam|LGBT people in Islam|Mukhannathun}}
{{Further|Islamic sexual jurisprudence|Liberalism and progressivism within Islam}}
[[File:World laws pertaining to homosexual relationships and expression.svg|thumb|300px|
'''Same-sex sexual activity illegal'''
{{legend|#f9dc36|Not enforced or unclear}}
{{legend|#ec8028|Penalty}}
{{legend|#e73e21|Life in prison}}
{{legend|#cc6633|Death penalty on books but not applied}}
{{legend|#8c201f|Death penalty}}]]

[[Interfaith marriage]]s are recognized between Muslims and Non-Muslim "[[People of the Book]]" (usually enumerated as [[Jews]], [[Christians]], and [[Sabians]]).<ref name=ODI>{{cite encyclopedia|title=Ahl al-Kitab|editor=John L. Esposito|encyclopedia=The Oxford Dictionary of Islam|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Oxford|year=2014|url=https://archive.org/details/oxforddictionary00bada|df=dmy-all|doi=10.1093/acref/9780195125580.001.0001|isbn=9780195125580}}</ref><ref name=Leeman2009>{{cite journal |last=Leeman |first=A. B. |year=2009 |title=Interfaith Marriage in Islam: An Examination of the Legal Theory Behind the Traditional and Reformist Positions |url=https://ilj.law.indiana.edu/articles/84/84_2_Leeman.pdf |url-status=live |journal=[[Indiana Law Journal]] |location=[[Bloomington, Indiana]] |publisher=[[Indiana University Maurer School of Law]] |volume=84 |issue=2 |pages=743–772 |issn=0019-6665 |s2cid=52224503 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181123062516/https://ilj.law.indiana.edu/articles/84/84_2_Leeman.pdf |archive-date=23 November 2018 |access-date=25 August 2021}}</ref> According to the traditional interpretation of [[Sharia|Islamic law]] (''sharīʿa''), a Muslim man is allowed to marry a Christian or Jewish woman, but this ruling does not apply to women who belong to [[Islam and other religions|other Non-Muslim religious groups]],{{sfn|Leeman|2009|p=755}} whereas a Muslim woman is not allowed to marry a Non-Muslim man of any Non-Muslim religious group.{{sfn|Leeman|2009|p=755}}<ref>{{cite book |author-last=Elmali-Karakaya |author-first=Ayse |year=2020 |chapter=Being Married to a Non-Muslim Husband: Religious Identity in Muslim Women's Interfaith Marriages |editor1-last=Hood |editor1-first=Ralph W. |editor2-last=Cheruvallil-Contractor |editor2-first=Sariya |title=Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion: A Diversity of Paradigms |volume=31 |pages=388–410 |location=[[Leiden]] and [[Boston]] |publisher=[[Brill Publishers]] |doi=10.1163/9789004443969_020 |isbn=978-90-04-44348-8 |s2cid=234539750 |issn=1046-8064}}</ref> In general, the [[Quran]] tells Muslim men not to marry Non-Muslim women,{{sfn|Leeman|2009|p=755}} and it tells Muslim women not to marry non-Muslim men,<ref name=":757">{{harv|Leeman|2009|p=757}}:These passages are traditionally interpreted as a general prohibition on marriage outside Islam for Muslim women.116 Similar passages117 forbid Muslim men from marrying non-Muslim women. However, another verse  specifically authorizes Muslim men to marry women from the People of the Book.118 The Qur'an offers no such express allowance (or prohibition) for Muslim women.119 Although the Qur'an contains no clear prohibition against marrying People of the Book, traditional scholars have reasoned: "If men needed to be given express permission to marry a [non-Muslim], women needed to be given express permission as well, but since they were not given any such permission then they must be barred from marrying a [non-Muslim]."</ref> but it makes an allowance for Muslim men to marry women of the People of the Book under certain conditions, such as a low amount of Muslim women in their vicinity. Additionally, the non-Muslim wife must be devout in her religion and not be unchaste.{{sfn|Leeman|2009|p=755}}<ref name=ODI/> Some Muslim scholars{{Who|date=November 2024}} discourage all interfaith marriages, citing cultural differences between Muslims and Non-Muslims.{{sfn|Leeman|2009|p=756}}

In some societies outside the traditional ''[[Divisions of the world in Islam|dar al-islam]]'', interfaith marriages between Muslims and Non-Muslims are not uncommon, including marriages that contradict the historic Sunni understanding of ''[[Ijma|ijmāʿ]]'' (the consensus of ''[[Faqīh|fuqāha]]'') as to the bounds of legitimacy.<ref name="Ghouse2017">{{cite web |last1=Ghouse |first1=Mike |title=Can A Muslim Woman Marry A Non-Muslim Man? |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/can-a-muslim-woman-marry-a-non-muslim-man_b_589aae92e4b061551b3e05a8 |work=[[The Huffington Post]] |access-date=31 October 2020 |language=en |date=8 February 2017}}</ref> The tradition of [[Liberalism and progressivism within Islam|reformist and progressive Islam]], however, permits marriage between Muslim women and Non-Muslim men;{{sfn|Leeman|2009}} Islamic scholars opining this view include [[Khaleel Mohammed]], [[Hassan Al-Turabi]], among others.<ref name="Jahangir2017">{{cite web |last=Jahangir |first=Junaid |date=21 March 2017 |title=Muslim Women Can Marry Outside The Faith |url=https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/junaid-jahangir/muslim-women-marriage_b_15472982.html |url-status=live |work=[[The Huffington Post]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170325020231/https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/junaid-jahangir/muslim-women-marriage_b_15472982.html |archive-date=25 March 2017 |access-date=25 August 2021}}</ref> Despite [[Sunni Islam]] prohibiting it, interfaith marriages between Muslim women and Non-Muslim men take place at substantial rates.<ref name="Ghouse2017"/>{{sfn|Leeman|2009}} In the [[United States]], about 10% of Muslim women are today married to Non-Muslim men.<ref name="pewforum.org">{{cite web |author=<!--Staff writer(s)/no by-line.--> |date=25 July 2017 |title=Roughly one-in-ten married Muslims have a non-Muslim spouse |url=https://www.pewforum.org/2017/07/26/identity-assimilation-and-community/pf_2017-06-26_muslimamericans-02new-04/ |url-status=live |location=[[Washington, D.C.]] |publisher=[[Pew Research Center]] |series=The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181016061221/https://www.pewforum.org/2017/07/26/identity-assimilation-and-community/pf_2017-06-26_muslimamericans-02new-04/ |archive-date=16 October 2018 |access-date=25 August 2021}}</ref>

[[File:21. İstanbul Onur Yürüyüşü Gay Pride (58).jpg|thumb|250px|left|[[Istanbul Pride|Istanbul LGBTQ Pride parade]] in 2013, [[Taksim Square]], [[Istanbul]], Turkey]]
Attitudes toward [[LGBT|LGBTQ+ people]] and their experiences in the [[Muslim world]] have been influenced by its religious, legal, social, political, and cultural history.<ref name="Schmidtke 1999"/><ref name="Islamic Homosexualities"/><ref name="TEOEM"/><ref name="lawnet.fordham.edu">{{cite journal |last1=Rehman |first1=Javaid |last2=Polymenopoulou |first2=Eleni |year=2013 |title=Is Green a Part of the Rainbow? ''Sharia'', Homosexuality, and LGBT Rights in the Muslim World |url=https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2322&context=ilj |url-status=live |journal=[[Fordham International Law Journal]] |publisher=[[Fordham University School of Law]] |volume=37 |issue=1 |pages=1–53 |issn=0747-9395 |oclc=52769025 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180721220600/https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=2322&context=ilj |archive-date=21 July 2018 |access-date=30 October 2021}}</ref><ref name="iranica-law">{{cite encyclopedia |author-last=Rowson |author-first=Everett K. |author-link=Everett K. Rowson |title=HOMOSEXUALITY ii. IN ISLAMIC LAW |url=https://iranicaonline.org/articles/homosexuality-ii |volume=XII/4 |pages=441–445 |encyclopedia=[[Encyclopædia Iranica]] |publisher=[[Columbia University]] |location=New York |date=30 December 2012 |orig-date=15 December 2004 |doi=10.1163/2330-4804_EIRO_COM_11037 |doi-access=free |issn=2330-4804 |access-date=13 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130517035334/https://iranicaonline.org/articles/homosexuality-ii |archive-date=17 May 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref> The religious stigma and [[Sexual taboo in the Middle East|sexual taboo]] associated with homosexuality in Islamic societies can have profound effects for those Muslims who self-identify as LGBTQ+.<ref name="lawnet.fordham.edu"/><ref>{{cite journal |author-last=Polymenopoulou |author-first=Eleni |date=18 May 2020 |title=Forum: LGBTQ+ Issues in International Relations, Human Rights & Development – Same-Sex Narratives and LGBTI Activism in the Muslim World |url=https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2020/05/18/same-sex-narratives-and-lgbti-activism-in-muslim-world/ |url-status=live |journal=[[Georgetown Journal of International Affairs]] |location=[[Washington, D.C.]] |publisher=[[Walsh School of Foreign Service]] at the [[Georgetown University]] |issn=1526-0054 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201020121756/https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2020/05/18/same-sex-narratives-and-lgbti-activism-in-muslim-world/ |archive-date=20 October 2020 |access-date=7 December 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=19 May 2017 |title=Origins of Homophobia in the Muslim Community |url=https://sydneyqueermuslims.org.au/2017/05/19/source-homophobia-muslim-community/ |url-status=live |website=sydneyqueermuslims.org.au |location=Sydney |publisher=[[Sydney Queer Muslims]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180312142856/https://sydneyqueermuslims.org.au/2017/05/19/source-homophobia-muslim-community/ |archive-date=12 March 2018 |access-date=7 December 2021}}</ref><ref name="Ibrahim 2016">{{cite journal |author-last=Ibrahim |author-first=Nur Amali |date=October 2016 |title=Homophobic Muslims: Emerging Trends in Multireligious Singapore |journal=Comparative Studies in Society and History |volume=58 |issue=4 |location=[[Cambridge]] and [[New York City|New York]] |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |pages=955–981 |doi=10.1017/S0010417516000499 |issn=1475-2999 |jstor=26293235 |s2cid=152039212}}</ref> Today, most LGBTQ-affirming Islamic organizations and individual congregations are primarily based in the [[Western world]] and [[South Asia]]n countries; they usually identify themselves with the [[Liberalism and progressivism within Islam|liberal and progressive movements within Islam]].<ref name="lawnet.fordham.edu"/><ref>{{cite book |author-last=Geissinger |author-first=Aisha |year=2012 |chapter=Islam and Discourses on Same-Sex Desire |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8sn9vMPUsNYC&pg=PA80 |editor1-last=Boisvert |editor1-first=Donald L. |editor2-last=Johnson |editor2-first=Jay E. |title=Queer Religion: Homosexuality in Modern Religious History, Volume 1 |location=[[Santa Barbara, California]] |publisher=[[Greenwood Publishing Group|Praeger Publishers]] |pages=80–90 |isbn=978-0-313-35359-8 |lccn=2011043406}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author-last=Kurzman |author-first=Charles |author-link=Charles Kurzman |year=1998 |chapter=Liberal Islam and Its Islamic Context |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4n8HSe9SfXMC&pg=PA1 |editor-last=Kurzman |editor-first=Charles |title=Liberal Islam: A Sourcebook |location=[[Oxford]] and [[New York City|New York]] |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |pages=1–26 |isbn=9780195116229 |oclc=37368975}}</ref>

Homosexual acts are [[Haram|forbidden]] in traditional [[Islamic jurisprudence]] and are liable to different punishments, including [[flagellation|flogging]], [[Stoning in Islam|stoning]], and the [[Capital punishment in Islam|death penalty]],<ref name="Schmidtke 1999"/><ref name="iranica-law"/><ref name="Ibrahim 2016"/> depending on the situation and [[Madhhab|legal school]].<ref name="Ibrahim 2016"/> However, homosexual relationships were generally tolerated in [[pre-modern Islamic societies]],<ref name="Schmidtke 1999"/><ref name="Islamic Homosexualities"/><ref name="iranica-law"/> and historical records suggest that these laws were invoked infrequently, mainly in cases of [[Rape in Islamic law|rape]] or other "exceptionally blatant infringement on [[Public morality|public morals]]".<ref name="iranica-law"/> Public attitudes toward homosexuality in the Muslim world underwent a marked negative change starting from the 19th century through the [[International propagation of Salafism and Wahhabism|global spread]] of [[Islamic fundamentalism|Islamic fundamentalist movements]] such as [[Salafi movement|Salafism]] and [[Wahhabism]],<ref name="Ibrahim 2016"/> and the influence of the sexual notions and restrictive norms prevalent in [[Europe]] at the time: a number of Muslim-majority countries have retained criminal penalties for homosexual acts enacted under European [[Colonialism|colonial]] rule.<ref name="Ibrahim 2016"/> In recent times, extreme [[prejudice]], [[Discrimination against LGBT people|discrimination]], and [[violence against LGBT people]] persists, both [[Societal attitudes toward homosexuality|socially]] and legally, in much of the Muslim world,<ref name="lawnet.fordham.edu"/> exacerbated by increasingly [[Social conservatism|socially conservative]] attitudes and the rise of [[Islamism|Islamist movements]] in Muslim-majority countries.<ref name="Ibrahim 2016"/>

===Judaism===
{{main|Judaism and sexuality}}
{{see also|Homosexuality and Judaism|Judaism and masturbation|Tzniut|Niddah|Yichud|Negiah|Adultery#Judaism}}
[[File:Homophobic protestors-02. Haifa 2010.jpg|thumb|250px|right|[[Orthodox Judaism|Orthodox Jewish]] protesters holding Anti-LGBTQ Protest signs during the Gay Pride parade in [[Haifa]], [[Israel]] (2010)]]

In the perspective of traditional [[Judaism]], sex and reproduction are the holiest of acts one can do, the act through which one can imitate [[God in Judaism|God]], and in order to preserve its sanctity there are many boundaries and guidelines. Within the boundaries, there are virtually no outright strictures, and it is in fact obligatory. It prohibits sexual relations outside of heterosexual marriage, maintains biblical strictures on relations within marriage including observance of ''[[niddah]]'', a prohibition on relations for a period including the menstrual period, and ''[[tzniut]]'', requirements of modest dress and behavior. Traditional Judaism views the physical acts of adultery, incest, intentional waste of semen, the physical act of [[Men who have sex with men|men having sex with men]], and male masturbation as grave sins. Judaism permits relatively free divorce, with [[Orthodox Judaism]] and [[Conservative Judaism]] requiring a [[get (divorce document)|religious divorce]] ceremony for a divorce to be religiously recognized. Worldwide movements in Judaism considered more liberal have rejected Jewish law as binding but rather inspirational and allegorical, so adapted perspectives more consistent with general contemporary Western culture.

Most of mainstream Judaism does not accept [[polyamory]], although some people consider themselves Jewish and polyamorous.<ref name="haaretz.com">{{Cite news|last=Krupkin |first=Taly |url=http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/1.551971 |title=Polyamorous Jews seek acceptance - Jewish World News - Haaretz - Israel News |newspaper=Haaretz |date=2013-10-12 |access-date=2017-06-30}}</ref> One prominent rabbi who accepts polyamory is [[Sharon Kleinbaum]], who was ordained in [[Reconstructionist Judaism]], which considers biblical Jewish law as not necessarily binding, but is treated as a valuable cultural remnant that should be upheld unless there is reason for the contrary. She is the senior rabbi at Congregation Beit Simchat Torah in New York which works independently of any major American Jewish denomination. R Kleinbaum states that polyamory is a choice that does not preclude a Jewishly observant, socially conscious life.<ref name="haaretz.com"/> Some polyamorous Jews also point to biblical patriarchs having multiple wives and concubines as evidence that polyamorous relationships can be sacred in Judaism.<ref name="polyamorous">{{cite web|last=Lavin |first=Talia |url=http://www.jta.org/2013/10/10/news-opinion/united-states/ahava-raba-polyamorous-jews-engage-with-multiple-loves-and-their-jewish-traditions |title=Married and dating: Polyamorous Jews share love, seek acceptance {{pipe}} Jewish Telegraphic Agency |website=Jta.org |date=2013-10-10 |access-date=2017-06-30}}</ref> There is an email list dedicated to polyamorous Jews, called ''AhavaRaba'', which roughly translates to "big love" in Hebrew.<ref name="polyamorous"/> (Its name echoes the [[Ahava rabbah]] prayer expressing thanks for God's "abundant love").

====Orthodox====
{{Main|Tzniut}}
There are several levels to the observance of physical and personal modesty (''tzniut''), according to [[Orthodox Judaism]], as derived from various sources in ''[[halakha]]''. Observance of these rules varies from aspirational to mandatory to routine across the spectrum of Orthodox stricture and observance.

Orthodox Judaism also maintains a strong prohibition on interfaith sexual relations and marriage. Orthodox Judaism, alone of all the Jewish denominations, retains relatively mild traditional disabilities on divorce, including a Biblical prohibition on a [[Kohen]] (priestly descendant of [[Aaron]]) marrying a divorcee or a woman who has engaged in certain types of [[sexual misconduct]]. An Orthodox [[get (divorce document)|bill of divorce]] is required for a divorce to be recognized.

====Conservative====
[[Conservative Judaism]], consistent with its general view that [[halakha]] (Jewish law) is a binding guide to Jewish life but subject to periodic revision by the Rabbinate, has lifted a number of strictures observed by [[Orthodox Judaism]]. In particular, in December 2006, Conservative Judaism's [[Committee on Jewish Law and Standards]] adopted ''[[responsum|responsa]]'' presenting diametrically opposed views on the issue of homosexuality. It adopted an opinion restricting a prior prohibition on homosexual conduct to male-male anal sex only, which it declared to be the only Biblical prohibition, declaring all other prohibitions (e.g. male-male oral sex or lesbian sex) rabbinic, and lifting all rabbinic restrictions based on its interpretation of the Talmudic principle of [[Kevod HaBriyot]] ("human dignity"). While declining to develop a form of religious gay marriage, it permitted blessing lesbian and gay unions and ordaining openly lesbian and gay rabbis who agree not to engage in male-male anal sex.<ref name="rabbinevins-gayjews">{{Cite web|url=http://www.rabbinevins.org/HHH%20Dorff%20Nevins%20Reisner%20Final2.pdf|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070604193252/http://www.rabbinevins.org/HHH%20Dorff%20Nevins%20Reisner%20Final2.pdf|url-status=dead|title=Elliott N. Dorff, Daniel Evans, and Avram Reisner. ''Homosexuality, Human Dignity, and Halakha.'' Committee on Jewish Law and Standards, Rabbinical Assembly, December 6, 2006|archivedate=June 4, 2007}}</ref> It is also a traditionalist opinion, upholding all traditional prohibitions on homosexual activity, also adopted as a majority opinion,<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/docs/Roth_Final.pdf|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070422081604/http://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/docs/Roth_Final.pdf|url-status=dead|title=Rabbi Joel Roth, Homosexuality Revisited, Committee on Jewish Law and Standards, Rabbinical Assembly, December 6, 2006|archivedate=April 22, 2007}}</ref> The approach permits individual rabbis, congregations, and rabbinical schools to set their own policy on homosexual conduct. It reflects a profound change from a prior blanket prohibition on male homosexual practices. It acknowledges a sharp divergence of views on sexual matters within Conservative Judaism, such that there is no single Conservative Jewish approach to matters of sexuality. Conservative Judaism currently straddles the divide between liberal and traditional opinion on sexual matters within contemporary American society, permitting both views.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://forward.com/news/9576/conservative-panel-votes-to-permit-gay-rabbis/|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20061208205536/http://www.forward.com/articles/conservative-panel-votes-to-permit-gay-rabbis/|url-status=dead|title=Conservative Panel Votes To Permit Gay Rabbis|archivedate=December 8, 2006|website=The Forward}}</ref>

Conservative Judaism has maintained on its books a variety of requirements and prohibitions, including a requirement that married women observe the family purity laws and a general prohibition on non-marital heterosexual conduct. The family purity laws require women to be recognized as [[Tumah and taharah|tumah]] or [[niddah]] during their [[menstrual period]]. As a tumah, a woman is to wait 7 days for her menstrual cycle to end and then 7 "clean days" in order to enter the [[mikveh]] and begin sexual relations.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Ner-David |first1=Haviva |chapter=Reclaiming Nidah and Mikveh through Ideological and Practical Reinterpretation |pages=116–135 |jstor=j.ctt9qgfbf.12 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3trmH8PaQLsC&pg=PA116 |editor1-last=Ruttenberg |editor1-first=Danya |title=The Passionate Torah: Sex and Judaism |date=2009 |publisher=NYU Press |isbn=978-0-8147-7634-6 }}</ref> During this time, it is forbidden to have any type of contact with the niddah, thus anything she touches is not to be touched and no physical contact is permitted.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/ot/lev/15?lang=eng|title=The Third Book of Moses Called Leviticus|date=2016|website=The Church of Jesus Christ Latter-Day Saints}}</ref> On the same day as the [[Committee on Jewish Law and Standards]] released its homosexuality responsa, it released multiple opinions on the subject of niddah including a responsum lifting certain traditional restrictions on husband-wife contact during the niddah period while maintaining a prohibition on sexual relations. The permissive responsum on homosexuality used the Conservative movement's approach to niddah as an analogy for construing the Biblical prohibition against male homosexual conduct narrowly and lifting restrictions it deemed Rabbinic in nature. The responsum indicated it would be making a practical analogy between an approach in which male homosexual couples would be on their honor to refrain from certain acts and its approach to niddah:
{{blockquote|We expect homosexual students to observe the rulings of this responsum in the same way that we expect heterosexual students to observe the [[Committee on Jewish Law and Standards|CJLS]] rulings on niddah. We also expect that interview committees, administrators, faculty and fellow students will respect the privacy and dignity of gay and lesbian students in the same way that they respect the privacy and dignity of heterosexual students.}}

The responsum enjoined young people not to be "promiscuous" and to prepare themselves for "traditional marriage" if possible, while not explicitly lifting or re-enforcing any express strictures on non-marital heterosexual conduct.<ref name = "rabbinevins-gayjews"/>

Even before this responsum, strictures on pre-marital sex had been substantially ignored, even in official circles. For example, when the [[Jewish Theological Seminary of America]] proposed enforcing a policy against non-marital cohabitation by rabbinical students in the 1990s, protests by cohabiting rabbinical students resulted in a complete rescission of the policy.

Conservative Judaism formally [[Interfaith marriage in Judaism|prohibits interfaith marriage]] and its standards currently indicate it will expel a rabbi who performs an interfaith marriage. It maintains a variety of formal strictures including a prohibition on making birth announcements in synagogue bulletins for children on non-Jewish mothers and accepting non-Jews as synagogue members. However, interfaith marriage is relatively widespread among the Conservative laity, and the Conservative movement has recently adapted a policy of being more welcoming of interfaith couples in the hopes of interesting their children in Judaism.

Conservative Judaism, which was for much of the 20th century the largest Jewish denomination in the United States declined sharply in synagogue membership in the United States the 1990s, from 51% of synagogue memberships in 1990 to 33.1% in 2001, with most of the loss going to Orthodox Judaism and most of the rest to Reform. The fracturing in American society of opinion between increasingly liberal and increasingly traditionalist viewpoints on sexual and other issues, as well as the gap between official opinion and general lay practice vis-a-vis the more traditionalist and liberal denominations, may have contributed to the decline.<ref name="icpa-waxman">{{Cite web|url=http://www.jcpa.org/cjc/cjc-waxman-f05.htm|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120701162349/http://www.jcpa.org/cjc/cjc-waxman-f05.htm|url-status=dead|title=Chaim Waxman, Winners and Losers in Denominational Memberships in the United States. Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, 2005|archivedate=July 1, 2012}}</ref>

====Reform, Liberal, Reconstructionist, and Humanistic====
{{Further|LGBT-affirming denominations in Judaism|LGBT clergy in Judaism|Same-sex marriage and Judaism}}
[[File:Pride Minyan.jpg|thumb|A halakhic egalitarian Pride [[minyan]] in [[Tel Aviv]] on the second Shabbat of [[Hanukkah]]]]

[[Reform Judaism]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ccarnet.org/ccar-responsa/same-sex-marriage-kiddushin/|title=5774.4|website=Central Conference of American Rabbis}}</ref> [[Humanistic Judaism]], and [[Reconstructionist Judaism]] do not observe or require traditional sexuality rules and have welcomed non-married and homosexual couples and endorsed homosexual commitment ceremonies and marriages.

Reform and Reconstructionist Judaism are more tolerant of interfaith partnerships and often explicitly welcome interfaith families at their synagogues and services. Reform and Liberal branches of Judaism do not currently perform religious (and therefore legally binding) marriage ceremonies for interfaith couples; however as of October 2020, Liberal Rabbis may bless an interfaith marriage under a [[chuppah]] at their discretion, provided the couple intend to keep a Jewish household.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.liberaljudaism.org/marriage-mixed-faith-blessings-faq/ | title=Marriage & Mixed Faith Blessings FAQ }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.timesofisrael.com/uk-liberal-rabbis-allow-interfaith-couples-to-marry-under-a-traditional-canopy/ | title=UK liberal rabbis allow interfaith couples to marry under a traditional canopy | website=[[The Times of Israel]] }}</ref> Humanistic Judaism permits interfaith marriage. Reform, Reconstructionist, and Humanistic Judaism also do not require a religious divorce ceremony separate from a civil divorce.

It has been speculated that the more tolerant attitudes of Reform, Reconstructionist, and Humanistic Judaism towards both sexual diversity and interfaith marriage may have contributed to the rise in their popularity during the 1990s, from about 33% of affiliated households to 38%, passing Conservative Judaism as the largest Jewish denomination in the United States.<ref name = "icpa-waxman"/>