Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Psychological statistics
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Psychometrics== {{Main|Psychometrics}} Psychometrics deals with measurement of psychological attributes. It involves developing and applying statistical models for mental measurements.<ref name=":0" /> The measurement theories are divided into two major areas: (1) [[Classical test theory]]; (2) [[Item Response Theory]].<ref name=":1">Nunnally, J. & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill.</ref> ===Classical test theory=== {{Main|Classical test theory}} The classical test theory or true score theory or reliability theory in statistics is a set of statistical procedures useful for development of psychological tests and scales. It is based on a fundamental equation, X = T + E where, X is total score, T is a true score and E is error of measurement. For each participant, it assumes that there exist a true score and it need to be obtained score (X) has to be as close to it as possible.<ref name=":0">Lord, F. M., and Novick, M. R. ( 1 968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, Mass. : Addison-Wesley, 1968.</ref><ref>Raykov, T. & Marcoulides, G.A. (2010) Introduction to Psychometric Theory. New York: Routledge.</ref> The closeness of X has with T is expressed in terms of ratability of the obtained score. The reliability in terms of classical test procedure is correlation between true score and obtained score. The typical test construction procedures has following steps: (1) Determine the construct (2) Outline the behavioral domain of the construct (3) Write 3 to 5 times more items than desired test length (4) Get item content analyzed by experts and cull items (5) Obtain data on initial version of the test (6) Item analysis (Statistical Procedure) (7) Factor analysis (Statistical Procedure) (8) After the second cull, make final version (9) Use it for research ====Reliability ==== {{Main|Reliability (research methods)}} The reliability is computed in specific ways. (A) Inter-Rater reliability: Inter-Rater reliability is estimate of agreement between independent raters. This is most useful for subjective responses. [[Cohen's kappa|Cohen's Kappa]], [[Krippendorff's Alpha]], [[Intra-class correlation coefficient|Intra-Class correlation coefficients]], [[Correlation coefficient]]s, Kendal's concordance coefficient, etc. are useful statistical tools. (B) Test-Retest Reliability: Test-Retest Procedure is estimation of temporal consistency of the test. A test is administered twice to the same sample with a time interval. Correlation between two sets of scores is used as an estimate of reliability. Testing conditions are assumed to be identical. (C) Internal Consistency Reliability: Internal consistency reliability estimates consistency of items with each other. Split-half reliability ([[Spearman–Brown prediction formula|Spearman- Brown Prophecy]]) and [[Cronbach's alpha|Cronbach Alpha]] are popular estimates of this reliability.<ref>Cronbach LJ (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297–334. doi:10.1007/bf02310555</ref> (D) [[Parallel-forms Reliability|Parallel Form Reliability]]: It is an estimate of consistency between two different instruments of measurement. The inter-correlation between two parallel forms of a test or scale is used as an estimate of parallel form reliability. ====Validity==== {{Main|Test validity}} Validity of a scale or test is ability of the instrument to measure what it purports to measure.<ref name=":1" /> [[Construct validity]], [[Content Validity]], and [[Criterion Validity]] are types of validity. Construct validity is estimated by convergent and discriminant validity and factor analysis. Convergent and discriminant validity are ascertained by correlation between similar of different constructs. Content Validity: Subject matter experts evaluate content validity. Criterion Validity is correlation between the test and a criterion variable (or variables) of the construct. [[Regression analysis]], [[Multiple regression analysis]], and [[Logistic regression]] are used as an estimate of criterion validity. Software applications: The [[R (programming language)|R software]] has ‘psych’ package that is useful for [[Classical test theory|classical test theory analysis]].<ref>Kline, T. J. B. (2005)Psychological Testing: A Practical Approach to Design and Evaluation. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks.</ref> ===Modern test theory === {{Main|Item response theory}} The modern test theory is based on latent trait model. Every item estimates the ability of the test taker. The ability parameter is called as theta (θ). The difficulty parameter is called b. the two important assumptions are local independence and unidimensionality. The Item Response Theory has three models. They are one parameter logistic model, two parameter logistic model and three parameter logistic model. In addition, Polychromous IRT Model are also useful.<ref>Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan H. (1985). Item Response theory: Principles and Applications. Boston: Kluwer.</ref> The R Software has ‘ltm’, packages useful for IRT analysis.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Psychological statistics
(section)
Add topic