Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Procedural justice
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Giving group members a voice == Procedural justice deals with the perceptions of fairness regarding outcomes. It reflects the extent in which an individual perceives that outcome allocation decisions have been fairly made. The use of fair procedures helps communicate that employees are valued members of the group. Procedural Justice can be examined by focusing on the formal procedures used to make decisions. Procedural justice, a subcomponent of [[organizational justice]], is important in communication and in the workplace because it involves fair procedures, it allows the employees to have a say in the decision process, it gives employees fair treatment, and allows them to have more input in the appraisal process. Additionally, research by [[Tom R. Tyler]] and colleagues found that giving disgruntled group members a voice regardless of whether it is instrumental (i.e., a voice that affects the decision-making process) or non-instrumental (i.e., a voice that will not have any weighting on the decision-making process) is sometimes enough for a process to be viewed as fair.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Tyler|first=Tom|author2=Degoey Peter |author3=Smith Heather |title=Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model|journal=Journal of Personality and Social Psychology|year=1996|volume=70|issue=5|pages=913β930|doi=10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.913}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Lind|first=Edgar Allen|title=The social psychology of procedural justice|year=1988|publisher=Plenum Press|location=New York}}</ref> The ability and right to a voice is linked with feelings of respect and value, which emphasizes the importance of the interpersonal factors of procedural justice.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Tyler|first=Tom|author2=Degoey Peter|title=Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities|journal=Journal of Personality and Social Psychology|year=1995|volume=69|issue=3|pages=482β497|doi=10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.482 }}</ref> This is important in the workplace because employees will feel more satisfied and respected, which can help to increase job task and [[contextual performance]]. There is an emphasis on the interpersonal and social aspects of the procedure, which result in employees feeling more satisfied when their voices are able to be heard. This was argued by [[Greenberg and Folger]]. Procedural justice also is a major factor that contributes to the expression of employee [[dissent]]. It correlates positively with managers' upward dissent. With procedural justice there is a greater deal of fairness in the workplace.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Procedural justice
(section)
Add topic