Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Perfect number
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== History == In about 300 BC Euclid showed that if 2<sup>''p''</sup> − 1 is prime then 2<sup>''p''−1</sup>(2<sup>''p''</sup> − 1) is perfect. The first four perfect numbers were the only ones known to early [[Greek mathematics]], and the mathematician [[Nicomachus]] noted 8128 as early as around AD 100.<ref name="Dickinson LE (1919)">{{cite book|last=Dickson|first=L. E. | author-link = L. E. Dickson|title=History of the Theory of Numbers, Vol. I|page=4|year=1919|publisher=Carnegie Institution of Washington|location=Washington|url=https://archive.org/stream/historyoftheoryo01dick#page/4/}}</ref> In modern language, Nicomachus states without proof that {{em|every}} perfect number is of the form <math>2^{n-1}(2^n-1)</math> where <math>2^n-1</math> is prime.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/history/HistTopics/Perfect_numbers.html|title=Perfect numbers|website=www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk|access-date=9 May 2018}}</ref><ref>In ''[https://archive.org/download/NicomachusIntroToArithmetic/nicomachus_introduction_arithmetic.pdf Introduction to Arithmetic]'', Chapter 16, he says of perfect numbers, "There is a method of producing them, neat and unfailing, which neither passes by any of the perfect numbers nor fails to differentiate any of those that are not such, which is carried out in the following way." He then goes on to explain a procedure which is equivalent to finding a [[triangular number]] based on a Mersenne prime.</ref> He seems to be unaware that {{mvar|n}} itself has to be prime. He also says (wrongly) that the perfect numbers end in 6 or 8 alternately. (The first 5 perfect numbers end with digits 6, 8, 6, 8, 6; but the sixth also ends in 6.) [[Philo of Alexandria]] in his first-century book "On the creation" mentions perfect numbers, claiming that the world was created in 6 days and the moon orbits in 28 days because 6 and 28 are perfect. Philo is followed by [[Origen]],<ref>Commentary on the Gospel of John 28.1.1–4, with further references in the [[Sources Chrétiennes]] edition: vol. 385, 58–61.</ref> and by [[Didymus the Blind]], who adds the observation that there are only four perfect numbers that are less than 10,000. (Commentary on Genesis 1. 14–19).<ref>{{cite conference|url=http://torreys.org/sblpapers2015/S22-05_philonic_arithmological_exegesis.pdf |first=Justin M.|last=Rogers|title=The Reception of Philonic Arithmological Exegesis in Didymus the Blind's ''Commentary on Genesis''|work=Society of Biblical Literature National Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia|year=2015}}</ref> [[Augustine of Hippo]] defines perfect numbers in ''[[The City of God]]'' (Book XI, Chapter 30) in the early 5th century AD, repeating the claim that God created the world in 6 days because 6 is the smallest perfect number. The Egyptian mathematician [[Ibn Fallus|Ismail ibn Fallūs]] (1194–1252) mentioned the next three perfect numbers (33,550,336; 8,589,869,056; and 137,438,691,328) and listed a few more which are now known to be incorrect.<ref>Roshdi Rashed, ''The Development of Arabic Mathematics: Between Arithmetic and Algebra'' (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994), pp. 328–329.</ref> The first known European mention of the fifth perfect number is a manuscript written between 1456 and 1461 by an unknown mathematician.<ref>[[Bayerische Staatsbibliothek]], Clm 14908. See {{cite book|author=David Eugene Smith|author-link=David Eugene Smith|title=History of Mathematics: Volume II|year=1925|publisher=Dover|location=New York|isbn=0-486-20430-8|pages=21|url=https://archive.org/stream/historyofmathema031897mbp#page/n35/mode/2up}}</ref> In 1588, the Italian mathematician [[Pietro Cataldi]] identified the sixth (8,589,869,056) and the seventh (137,438,691,328) perfect numbers, and also proved that every perfect number obtained from Euclid's rule ends with a 6 or an 8.<ref>{{cite book|last=Dickson|first=L. E. | author-link = L. E. Dickson|title=History of the Theory of Numbers, Vol. I|year=1919|publisher=Carnegie Institution of Washington|location=Washington|page=10|url=https://archive.org/stream/historyoftheoryo01dick#page/10/}}</ref><ref name="Pickover C (2001)">{{cite book|last=Pickover|first=C|title=Wonders of Numbers: Adventures in Mathematics, Mind, and Meaning|year=2001|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Oxford|isbn=0-19-515799-0|pages=360|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=52N0JJBspM0C&pg=PA360}}</ref><ref name="Peterson I (2002)">{{cite book|last=Peterson|first=I|title=Mathematical Treks: From Surreal Numbers to Magic Circles|year=2002|publisher=Mathematical Association of America|location=Washington|isbn=88-8358-537-2|pages=132|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4gWSAraVhtAC&pg=PA132}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Perfect number
(section)
Add topic