Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Modus ponens
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Explanation == {{Unsourced section|date=May 2025}} The form of a ''modus ponens'' argument is a mixed [[hypothetical syllogism]], with two premises and a conclusion: # If ''P'', then ''Q''. # ''P''. # Therefore, ''Q''. The first premise is a [[Material conditional|conditional]] ("if–then") claim, namely that ''P'' implies ''Q''. The second premise is an assertion that ''P'', the [[Antecedent (logic)|antecedent]] of the conditional claim, is the case. From these two premises it can be logically concluded that ''Q'', the [[consequent]] of the conditional claim, must be the case as well. An example of an argument that fits the form ''modus ponens'': # If today is Tuesday, then John will go to work. # Today is Tuesday. # Therefore, John will go to work. This argument is [[Validity (logic)|valid]], but this has no bearing on whether any of the statements in the argument are actually [[Truth|true]]; for ''modus ponens'' to be a [[Soundness|sound]] argument, the premises must be true for any true instances of the conclusion. An [[argument]] can be valid but nonetheless unsound if one or more premises are false; if an argument is valid ''and'' all the premises are true, then the argument is sound. For example, John might be going to work on Wednesday. In this case, the reasoning for John's going to work (because it is Wednesday) is unsound. The argument is only sound on Tuesdays (when John goes to work), but valid on every day of the week. A [[propositional calculus|propositional]] argument using ''modus ponens'' is said to be [[Deductive reasoning|deductive]]. In single-conclusion [[sequent calculus|sequent calculi]], ''modus ponens'' is the Cut rule. The [[cut-elimination theorem]] for a calculus says that every proof involving Cut can be transformed (generally, by a constructive method) into a proof without Cut, and hence that Cut is [[admissible rule|admissible]]. The [[Curry–Howard correspondence]] between proofs and programs relates ''modus ponens'' to [[function application]]: if ''f'' is a function of type ''P'' → ''Q'' and ''x'' is of type ''P'', then ''f x'' is of type ''Q''. In [[artificial intelligence]], ''modus ponens'' is often called [[forward chaining]].
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Modus ponens
(section)
Add topic