Editing Maurice Duverger (section)

==Career==
A member of [[Jacques Doriot|Doriot's]] fascist [[Parti Populaire Français]] from age 20, Maurice Duverger completed his studies in from the [[Bordeaux]] Department of Law in 1942, before lecturing in law at [[Poitiers]] in 1942, and Bordeaux in 1943 (where he would, in 1948, found the [[Institut d'études politiques de Bordeaux]] as its first director). He also taught at [[Vichy France]]'s Institut d'études corporatives et sociales. In his first publication, "The Constitutions of France" (1944), he explained that the French constitution of 1940 created a "de facto government". However, towards the end of the war, Duverger grew close to the [[French Resistance|Resistance]], and in ''Libération''{{Clarify|date=August 2022}} analyzed the legitimacy of the new government of France and devoted himself to social-scientific theory.

After the War, he taught in the faculty of law and economic sciences in Paris, 1955 to 1985, and contributed to ''[[Libération]]'' and ''[[Le Monde]]''. From 1989 to 1994, he sat in the [[European Parliament]] as an MEP for the [[Italian Communist Party]]. In 1946 he expanded his theses, with a special interest in the relation between electoral systems and party systems. This interest is at the heart of his most important publication: "The Political Parties" (1951). The work is one of the classics of party research, translated into several languages. That thesis led to Duverger's law, and later he coined the term "[[semi-presidential system|semi-presidentialism]]" and "[[semi-parliamentary system|semi-parliamentarism]]".

===Political parties===
Having as a point of reference their structure, Duverger in his book ''Les Partis Politiques'' (1951) distinguished parties between elite-based parties and mass-based parties. Elite-based parties rather prefer the quality of their members over their quantity, their affiliates being people of great [[Social influence|influence]] on local or national scale. They have flexible and disorganized structures, in general are weakly disciplined and lack developed [[wikt:pragmatic|pragmatic]] content, allowing each of their members to benefit from an enormous freedom of action. Their funding is generally provided by a [[sponsor (commercial)|sponsor]], and as their strength comes from their elected [[Legislator|representatives]], they are typical parties of parliamentarian creation, which depend on the reputation and support of their benefactors.

Mass-based parties possess a secure organization and a strong structure arranged as a [[pyramid]], with superposed hierarchically arranged levels. Their members identify themselves more with the party's [[ideology]] than with its leader, so they have an abstract adhesion. Their decisions are based on the participation of each one of its members, and its founding is granted by their members' payments, a situation that leads them to gain as many adherents as possible. These parties tend to develop on a par with [[suffrage]] and [[democracy]]. For instance, elite-based parties execute an often sporadic political labor, focused on [[elections]]. However, the disadvantage this implies in relation to their contestant parties (which denote permanent labor and a disciplined and organic structure), impels them to modify their organization to become mass-based parties.