Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Marcus Furius Camillus
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Historicity == The traditional account of Camillus' life comes from Livy and Plutarch's eponymous ''Life''.<ref>See {{harvnb|Livy}} and {{harvnb|Plut. ''Cam.''}}.</ref> But these were based on a larger annalistic tradition which painted Camillus as the dominant figure in this period of history; Livy, for his part, organised his fifth and sixth books around Camillus' career (Camillus enters public office at the start of the fifth book and leaves it at the end of the sixth). Little evidence of this tradition survives, though fragments of [[Quintus Claudius Quadrigarius]]' work indicate that the myth of Camillus was well-established by the 80s and 70s BC.{{sfn|Forsythe|2005|p=255}} The ''name'' Camillus is attested in the Etruscan [[François Tomb]], built {{circa|300 BC}} near [[Vulci]]. One of the paintings therein describes a "Gneve Tarchunies Rumach" (probably Gnaeus Tarquinius the Roman) being killed by a "Marce Camitlnas" (possibly Marcus Camitilius or Marcus Camillus). It is not known, however, what specific legend the tomb depicts. Some scholars have suggested that Camitlnas refers to the Camillus of this article, but such attribution is problematic.{{sfn|Lomas|2018|pp=129–30, 356}} Scholars believe Camillus qua ''person'' probably existed: the {{em|fasti}}, if believed, record his importance and influence in Roman public life at this time.{{sfn|Cornell|1995|p=319}} But, in general, the quality of the sources – which interject "plenty of myth, embellishment, and fantasy" – led [[Mary Beard (classicist)|Mary Beard]], in the book ''SPQR'', to write "Camillus is probably not much less fictional than the first Romulus".{{sfn|Beard|2015|p=138}} Mommsen, writing in ''Römisches Strafrecht'', called Camillus' legend "the most dishonest of all Roman legends".{{sfn|Münzer|1910|loc=col. 348}} Tim Cornell, writing of Camillus, calls him "the most artificially contrived of all Rome's heroes".{{sfn|Cornell|1995|p=317}} Other scholars have suggested that Camillus emerged from a popular oral tradition which linked the ''names'' Camillus, Manlius Capitolinus, and Sulpicius to inscriptions placed on the temple of [[Juno Moneta]] (erected in 345 BC by [[Lucius Furius Camillus (consul 338 BC)|Lucius Furius Camillus]]).{{sfn|Forsythe|2005|p=256}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Marcus Furius Camillus
(section)
Add topic