Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Langlands program
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Background== The Langlands program is built on existing ideas: the [[philosophy of cusp forms]] formulated a few years earlier by [[Harish-Chandra]] and {{harvs|txt|authorlink=Israel Gelfand |last=Gelfand|year=1963}}, the work and Harish-Chandra's approach on [[semisimple Lie group]]s, and in technical terms the [[Selberg trace formula|trace formula]] of [[Atle Selberg|Selberg]] and others. What was new in Langlands' work, besides technical depth, was the proposed connection to number theory, together with its rich organisational structure hypothesised (so-called [[functor]]iality). Harish-Chandra's work exploited the principle that what can be done for one [[Semisimple Lie algebra|semisimple]] (or reductive) [[Lie group]], can be done for all. Therefore, once the role of some low-dimensional Lie groups such as GL(2) in the theory of modular forms had been recognised, and with hindsight GL(1) in [[class field theory]], the way was open to speculation about GL(''n'') for general ''n'' > 2. The 'cusp form' idea came out of the cusps on [[modular curves]] but also had a meaning visible in [[spectral theory]] as "[[spectrum (functional analysis)|discrete spectrum]]", contrasted with the "[[spectrum (functional analysis)|continuous spectrum]]" from [[Eisenstein series]]. It becomes much more technical for bigger Lie groups, because the [[Borel subgroup|parabolic subgroups]] are more numerous. In all these approaches technical methods were available, often inductive in nature and based on [[Levi decomposition]]s amongst other matters, but the field remained demanding.<ref>{{cite book|isbn=978-0-465-05074-1|title=Love & Math|first=Edward|last=Frenkel | author-link=Edward Frenkel| date=2013|quote=All this stuff, as my dad put it, is quite heavy: we've got Hitchin moduli spaces, mirror symmetry, ''A''-branes, ''B''-branes, automorphic sheaves... One can get a headache just trying to keep track of them all. Believe me, even among specialists, very few people know the nuts and bolts of all elements of this construction.|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/lovemathheartofh0000fren}}</ref> From the perspective of modular forms, examples such as [[Hilbert modular form]]s, [[Siegel modular form]]s, and [[theta-function|theta-series]] had been developed.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Langlands program
(section)
Add topic