Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Kolmogorov–Arnold–Moser theorem
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Statement== ===Integrable Hamiltonian systems=== The KAM theorem is usually stated in terms of trajectories in [[phase space]] of an integrable [[Hamiltonian system]]. The motion of an [[integrable system]] is confined to an [[invariant torus]] (a [[doughnut]]-shaped surface). Different [[initial condition]]s of the integrable Hamiltonian system will trace different invariant [[torus|tori]] in phase space. Plotting the coordinates of an integrable system would show that they are quasiperiodic. ===Perturbations=== The KAM theorem states that if the system is subjected to a weak nonlinear perturbation, some of the invariant tori are deformed and survive, i.e. there is a map from the original manifold to the deformed one that is continuous in the perturbation. Conversely, other invariant tori are destroyed: even arbitrarily small perturbations cause the manifold to no longer be invariant and there exists no such map to nearby manifolds. Surviving tori meet the non-resonance condition, i.e., they have “sufficiently irrational” frequencies. This implies that the motion on the deformed torus continues to be [[quasiperiodic]], with the independent periods changed (as a consequence of the non-degeneracy condition). The KAM theorem quantifies the level of perturbation that can be applied for this to be true. Those KAM tori that are destroyed by perturbation become invariant [[Cantor set]]s, named ''Cantori'' by [[Ian C. Percival]] in 1979.<ref>{{Cite journal|title = A variational principle for invariant tori of fixed frequency|journal = Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General|date = 1979-03-01|pages = L57–L60|volume = 12|issue = 3|doi = 10.1088/0305-4470/12/3/001|first = I C|last = Percival|bibcode = 1979JPhA...12L..57P }}</ref> The non-resonance and non-degeneracy conditions of the KAM theorem become increasingly difficult to satisfy for systems with more degrees of freedom. As the number of dimensions of the system increases, the volume occupied by the tori decreases. As the perturbation increases and the smooth curves disintegrate we move from KAM theory to Aubry–Mather theory which requires less stringent hypotheses and works with the Cantor-like sets. The existence of a KAM theorem for perturbations of quantum many-body integrable systems is still an open question, although it is believed that arbitrarily small perturbations will destroy integrability in the infinite size limit. ===Consequences=== An important consequence of the KAM theorem is that for a large set of initial conditions the motion remains perpetually quasiperiodic.{{which|date=January 2016}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Kolmogorov–Arnold–Moser theorem
(section)
Add topic