Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Jurisprudence
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Overview == Whereas lawyers are interested in what the law is on a specific issue in a specific jurisdiction, analytical philosophers of law are interested in identifying the features of law shared across cultures, times, and places. Taken together, these foundational features of law offer the kind of universal definition philosophers are after. The general approach allows philosophers to ask questions about, for example, what separates law from [[morality]], politics, or [[practical reason]].<ref name=":02">{{Citation |last=Marmor |first=Andrei |title=The Nature of Law |date=2015 |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/lawphil-nature/ |access-date=2019-05-15 |edition=Fall 2015 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |last2=Sarch |first2=Alexander |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy}}</ref> While the field has traditionally focused on giving an account of law's nature, some scholars have begun to examine the nature of domains within law, e.g. [[Tort|tort law]], [[Contract|contract law]], or [[criminal law]]. These scholars focus on what makes certain domains of law distinctive and how one domain differs from another. A particularly fecund area of research has been the distinction between tort law and criminal law, which more generally bears on the difference between civil and criminal law.<ref>{{Citation |last=Edwards |first=James |title=Theories of Criminal Law |date=2018 |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/criminal-law/ |access-date=2019-05-21 |edition=Fall 2018 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy}}</ref> In addition to analytic jurisprudence, legal philosophy is also concerned with normative theories of law. "Normative jurisprudence involves normative, evaluative, and otherwise prescriptive questions about the law."<ref name=":42">{{cite web |title=Philosophy of Law |url=http://www.iep.utm.edu/law-phil/#H2 |website=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Jurisprudence
(section)
Add topic