Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Insanity defense
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Non compos mentis== ''[[Non compos mentis]]'' (Latin) is a legal term meaning "not of sound mind".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://thesaurus.com/browse/non+compos+mentis|title=non compos mentis|website=thesaurus.com|access-date=2 February 2018|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180202190351/http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/non+compos+mentis|archive-date=2 February 2018}}</ref> ''Non compos mentis'' derives from the [[Latin]] ''non'' meaning "not", ''compos'' meaning "control" or "command", and ''mentis'' ([[genitive]] [[Grammatical number|singular]] of ''[[mens]]''), meaning "of mind". It is the direct opposite of ''[[Compos mentis]]'' (of a sound mind). Although typically used in law, this term can also be used metaphorically or figuratively; e.g. when one is in a confused state, intoxicated, or not of sound mind. The term may be applied when a determination of competency needs to be made by a physician for purposes of obtaining [[informed consent]] for treatments and, if necessary, assigning a surrogate to make health care decisions. While the proper sphere for this determination is in a court of law, this is practically, and most frequently, made by physicians in the clinical setting.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Appelbaum |first1=Paul S. |title=Assessment of patients' competence to consent to treatment |journal=The New England Journal of Medicine |date=1 November 2007 |volume=357 |issue=18 |pages=1834β40 |doi=10.1056/NEJMcp074045 |pmid=17978292|s2cid=28287262 }}</ref> In English law, the rule of ''non compos mentis'' was most commonly used when the defendant invoked religious or magical explanations for behaviour.<ref>{{Cite journal|doi= 10.2307/3475205|title=History of insanity as a defence to crime in English Criminal Law |last=Crotty |first=Homer D. |date=January 1924 |journal=California Law Review |volume=12 |issue=2 |pages=105β123 |jstor=3475205 |doi-access=free }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Insanity defense
(section)
Add topic