Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
InfiniBand
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== History == InfiniBand originated in 1999 from the merger of two competing designs: Future I/O and Next Generation I/O (NGIO). NGIO was led by [[Intel]], with a specification released in 1998,<ref>{{Cite news |title= Intel Introduces Next Generation I/O for Computing Servers |author= Scott Bekker |date= November 11, 1998 |url= https://rcpmag.com/articles/1998/11/11/intel-introduces-next-generation-io-for-computing-servers.aspx |work= Redmond Channel Partner |access-date= September 28, 2021 }}</ref> and joined by [[Sun Microsystems]] and [[Dell]]. Future I/O was backed by [[Compaq]], [[IBM]], and [[Hewlett-Packard]].<ref>{{Cite news |title= Warring NGIO and Future I/O groups to merge |author= Will Wade |date= August 31, 1999 |work= EE Times |url= https://www.eetimes.com/warring-ngio-and-future-i-o-groups-to-merge/ |access-date= September 26, 2021 }}</ref> This led to the formation of the InfiniBand Trade Association (IBTA), which included both sets of hardware vendors as well as software vendors such as [[Microsoft]]. At the time it was thought some of the more powerful computers were approaching the [[interconnect bottleneck]] of the [[Peripheral Component Interconnect|PCI]] bus, in spite of upgrades like [[PCI-X]].<ref name=pentakalos>{{cite web|last1=Pentakalos|first1=Odysseas|title=An Introduction to the InfiniBand Architecture|url=http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/network/2002/02/04/windows.html|website=O'Reilly|access-date=28 July 2014}}</ref> Version 1.0 of the InfiniBand Architecture Specification was released in 2000. Initially the IBTA vision for IB was simultaneously a replacement for PCI in I/O, Ethernet in the [[Central apparatus room|machine room]], [[Cluster (computing)|cluster]] interconnect and [[Fibre Channel]]. IBTA also envisaged decomposing server hardware on an IB [[Fabric computing|fabric]]. [[Mellanox]] had been founded in 1999 to develop NGIO technology, but by 2001 shipped an InfiniBand product line called InfiniBridge at 10 Gbit/second speeds.<ref name=timeline>{{cite web |title= Timeline |url= http://www.mellanox.com/page/timeline |publisher=Mellanox Technologies |access-date= September 26, 2021 }}</ref> Following the burst of the [[dot-com bubble]] there was hesitation in the industry to invest in such a far-reaching technology jump.<ref name=kim>{{cite web|last1=Kim|first1=Ted|title=Brief History of InfiniBand: Hype to Pragmatism|url=https://blogs.oracle.com/RandomDude/entry/history_hype_to_pragmatism|publisher=Oracle |access-date= September 28, 2021 |url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140808200954/https://blogs.oracle.com/RandomDude/entry/history_hype_to_pragmatism|archive-date=8 August 2014}}</ref> By 2002, Intel announced that instead of shipping IB integrated circuits ("chips"), it would focus on developing [[PCI Express]], and Microsoft discontinued IB development in favor of extending Ethernet. [[Sun Microsystems]] and [[Hitachi]] continued to support IB.<ref>{{cite web |title=Sun confirms commitment to InfiniBand |date= December 2, 2002 |author= Computerwire |url= https://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/12/30/sun_confirms_commitment_to_infiniband/ |website=The Register |access-date= September 26, 2021 }}</ref> In 2003, the [[System X (supercomputer)|System X]] supercomputer built at [[Virginia Tech]] used InfiniBand in what was estimated to be the third largest computer in the world at the time.<ref>{{Cite news |title= Virginia Tech Builds 10 TeraFlop Computer |url= https://www.rdworldonline.com/virginia-tech-builds-10-teraflop-computer/ |work= R&D World |date= November 30, 2003 |access-date= September 28, 2021 }}</ref> The [[OpenFabrics Alliance|OpenIB Alliance]] (later renamed OpenFabrics Alliance) was founded in 2004 to develop an open set of software for the [[Linux]] kernel. By February, 2005, the support was accepted into the 2.6.11 Linux kernel.<ref>{{cite news | title= Linux Kernel 2.6.11 Supports InfiniBand |url= http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3485401 |work= Internet News |author= Sean Michael Kerner |date= February 24, 2005 |access-date= September 28, 2021 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news| title= OpenIB Alliance Achieves Acceptance By Kernel.org |url= https://www.hpcwire.com/2005/01/21/openib-alliance-achieves-acceptance-by-kernel-org/ |work= Press release |date= January 21, 2005 |author= OpenIB Alliance |access-date= September 28, 2021 }}</ref> In November 2005 storage devices finally were released using InfiniBand from vendors such as Engenio.<ref name="comeback">{{Citation | url = http://www.infostor.com/index/articles/display/248655/articles/infostor/volume-10/issue-2/news-analysis-trends/news-analysis-trends/is-infiniband-poised-for-a-comeback.html | title = Is InfiniBand poised for a comeback? | journal = Infostor |author= Ann Silverthorn |volume = 10 | issue = 2 |date= January 12, 2006 |access-date= September 28, 2021 }}</ref> Cisco, desiring to keep technology superior to Ethernet off the market, adopted a "buy to kill" strategy. Cisco successfully killed InfiniBand switching companies such as Topspin via acquisition.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Connor |first1=Deni |title=What Cisco-Topspin deal means for InfiniBand |url=https://www.networkworld.com/article/863883/data-center-what-cisco-topspin-deal-means-for-infiniband.html |website=Network World |access-date=19 June 2024 |language=en}}</ref> {{Citation needed|reason=Given citation doesn't support the allegation|date=August 2024}} Of the top 500 supercomputers in 2009, [[Gigabit Ethernet]] was the internal interconnect technology in 259 installations, compared with 181 using InfiniBand.<ref>{{cite web |last1= Lawson |first1= Stephen |title= Two rival supercomputers duke it out for top spot |url= https://www.computerworld.com/article/2521602/two-rival-supercomputers-duke-it-out-for-top-spot.html |date= November 16, 2009 |work= Computerworld |access-date= September 29, 2021 |archive-date= September 29, 2021 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210929213924/https://www.computerworld.com/article/2521602/two-rival-supercomputers-duke-it-out-for-top-spot.html |url-status= dead }}</ref> In 2010, market leaders Mellanox and Voltaire merged, leaving just one other IB vendor, [[QLogic]], primarily a [[Fibre Channel]] vendor.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Raffo|first1=Dave|title=Largest InfiniBand vendors merge; eye converged networks|url=http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/largest-infiniband-vendors-merge-eye-converged-networks/|access-date=29 July 2014|archive-date=1 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170701002647/http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/largest-infiniband-vendors-merge-eye-converged-networks/|url-status=dead}}</ref> At the 2011 [[International Supercomputing Conference]], links running at about 56 gigabits per second (known as FDR, see below), were announced and demonstrated by connecting booths in the trade show.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.cio.com/article/684732/Mellanox_Demos_Souped_Up_Version_of_Infiniband |title = Mellanox Demos Souped-Up Version of InfiniBand |work= CIO |author= Mikael Ricknäs |date= June 20, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-date= April 6, 2012 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20120406182103/http://www.cio.com/article/684732/Mellanox_Demos_Souped_Up_Version_of_Infiniband |access-date= September 30, 2021 }}</ref> In 2012, Intel acquired QLogic's InfiniBand technology, leaving only one independent supplier.<ref>{{cite news | url = https://www.hpcwire.com/2012/01/23/intel_snaps_up_infiniband_technology_product_line_from_qlogic/ | title = Intel Snaps Up InfiniBand Technology, Product Line from QLogic |work= HPCwire |author= Michael Feldman |date= January 23, 2012 |access-date= September 29, 2021 }}</ref> By 2014, InfiniBand was the most popular internal connection technology for supercomputers, although within two years, [[10 Gigabit Ethernet]] started displacing it.<ref name="down"/> In 2016, it was reported that [[Oracle Corporation]] (an investor in Mellanox) might engineer its own InfiniBand hardware.<ref name="oracle"/> In 2019 [[Nvidia]] acquired Mellanox, the last independent supplier of InfiniBand products.<ref>{{Cite news |title= Nvidia to Acquire Mellanox for $6.9 Billion |date= March 11, 2019 |work= Press release |url= https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-to-acquire-mellanox-for-6-9-billion |access-date= September 26, 2021 }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
InfiniBand
(section)
Add topic