Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Ideal class group
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== History and origin of the ideal class group == Ideal class groups (or, rather, what were effectively ideal class groups) were studied some time before the idea of an [[Ideal (ring theory)|ideal]] was formulated. These groups appeared in the theory of [[quadratic form]]s: in the case of [[binary quadratic form|binary]] integral quadratic forms, as put into something like a final form by [[Carl Friedrich Gauss]], a composition law was defined on certain [[equivalence class]]es of forms. This gave a finite [[abelian group]], as was recognised at the time. Later [[Ernst Kummer]] was working towards a theory of [[cyclotomic field]]s. It had been realised (probably by several people) that failure to complete [[mathematical proof|proofs]] in the general case of [[Fermat's Last Theorem]] by factorisation using the [[roots of unity]] was for a very good reason: a failure of unique factorization β i.e., the [[fundamental theorem of arithmetic]] β to hold in the [[ring (mathematics)|ring]]s generated by those roots of unity was a major obstacle. Out of Kummer's work for the first time came a study of the obstruction to the factorization. We now recognise this as part of the ideal class group: in fact Kummer had isolated the <math>p</math>-[[torsion subgroup|torsion]] in that group for the [[field (mathematics)|field]] of <math>p</math>-roots of unity, for any [[prime number]] <math>p</math>, as the reason for the failure of the standard method of attack on the Fermat problem (see [[regular prime]]). Somewhat later again [[Richard Dedekind]] formulated the concept of an ideal, Kummer having worked in a different way. At this point the existing examples could be unified. It was shown that while rings of [[algebraic integer]]s do not always have unique factorization into primes (because they need not be [[principal ideal domain]]s), they do have the property that every [[proper ideal]] admits a unique factorization as a product of [[prime ideal]]s (that is, every ring of algebraic integers is a [[Dedekind domain]]). The size of the ideal class group can be considered as a measure for the deviation of a ring from being a principal ideal domain; a ring is a principal ideal domain if and only if it has a trivial ideal class group.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Ideal class group
(section)
Add topic