Editing Hoover Dam (section)

== Background ==
=== Search for resources ===
[[File:Hoover-dam-site.jpg|thumb|left|River view of the future dam site, {{circa|1904}}]]
As the United States developed the Southwest, the Colorado River was seen as a potential source of irrigation water. An initial attempt at diverting the river for irrigation purposes occurred in the late 1890s, when land speculator William Beatty built the [[Alamo Canal]] just north of the Mexican border; the canal dipped into Mexico before running to a desolate area Beatty named the [[Imperial Valley]].{{sfn|Hiltzik|2010|pp=20–27}} Though water from the Alamo Canal allowed for the widespread settlement of the valley, the canal proved expensive to operate. After a catastrophic breach that caused the Colorado River to fill the [[Salton Sea]],{{sfn|Hiltzik|2010|pp=41–50}} the [[Southern Pacific Railroad]] spent $3&nbsp;million in 1906–07 to stabilize the waterway, an amount it hoped in vain that it would be reimbursed for by the federal government. Even after the waterway was stabilized, it proved unsatisfactory because of constant disputes with landowners on the Mexican side of the border.{{sfn|Hiltzik|2010|pp=57–60}}

As the technology of [[electric power transmission]] improved, the [[Lower Colorado River Valley|Lower Colorado]] was considered for its [[hydroelectric]]-power potential. In 1902, the [[Southern California Edison|Edison Electric Company of Los Angeles]] surveyed the river in the hope of building a {{convert|40|ft|adj=on}} rock dam which could generate {{convert|10,000|hp}}. However, [[War of currents|at the time]], the limit of transmission of electric power was {{convert|80|mi}}, and there were few customers (mostly mines) within that limit. Edison allowed land options it held on the river to lapse—including an option for what became the site of Hoover Dam.{{sfn|Hiltzik|2010|pp=55–56}}

In the following years, the [[Bureau of Reclamation]] (BOR), known as the Reclamation Service at the time, also considered the Lower Colorado as the site for a dam. Service chief [[Arthur Powell Davis]] proposed using dynamite to collapse the walls of Boulder Canyon,{{sfn|Hiltzik|2010|pp=58–59}} {{convert|20|mi}} north of the eventual dam site, into the river.{{sfn|Dunar|McBride|2001|p=2}} The river would carry off the smaller pieces of debris, and a dam would be built incorporating the remaining rubble. In 1922, after considering it for several years, the Reclamation Service finally rejected the proposal, citing doubts about the unproven technique and questions as to whether it would, in fact, save money.{{sfn|Hiltzik|2010|pp=58–59}}

=== Planning and agreements ===

In 1922, the Reclamation Service presented a report calling for the development of a dam on the Colorado River for flood control and electric power generation. The report was principally authored by Davis and was called the Fall-Davis report after Interior Secretary [[Albert Fall]]. The Fall-Davis report cited use of the Colorado River as a federal concern because the river's basin covered several states, and the river eventually entered Mexico.{{sfn|Hiltzik|2010|p=67}} Though the Fall-Davis report called for a dam "at or near Boulder Canyon", the Reclamation Service (which was renamed the Bureau of Reclamation the following year) found that canyon unsuitable.{{sfn|Hiltzik|2010|p=68}} One potential site at Boulder Canyon was bisected by a [[geologic fault]]; two others were so narrow there was no space for a construction camp at the bottom of the canyon{{sfn|Hiltzik|2010|p=68}} or for a spillway. The Service investigated Black Canyon and found it ideal; a railway could be laid from the railhead in Las Vegas to the top of the dam site.{{sfn|Dunar|McBride|2001|p=6}} Despite the site change, the dam project was referred to as the "Boulder Canyon Project".{{sfn|Stevens|1988|pp=26–27}}
[[File:Boulder damsite sketch.jpg|thumb|left|Sketch of the proposed dam site and reservoir, {{circa|1921}}]]
With little guidance on water allocation from the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]], proponents of the dam feared endless litigation. Delph Carpenter, a Colorado attorney, proposed that the seven states which fell within the river's basin (California, Nevada, Arizona, Utah, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming) form an [[interstate compact]], with the approval of Congress.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2011-12-09|title=Sharing Colorado River Water: History, Public Policy and the Colorado River Compact|url=https://wrrc.arizona.edu/publications/arroyo-newsletter/sharing-colorado-river-water-history-public-policy-and-colorado-river|access-date=2020-08-01|website=wrrc.arizona.edu|language=en}}</ref> Such compacts were authorized by [[Article I of the United States Constitution]] but had never been concluded among more than two states. In 1922, representatives of seven states met with then-[[United States Secretary of Commerce|Secretary of Commerce]] [[Herbert Hoover]].{{sfn|Hiltzik|2010|pp=73–79}} Initial talks produced no result, but when the Supreme Court handed down the ''[[Wyoming v. Colorado]]'' decision undermining the claims of the upstream states, they became anxious to reach an agreement. The resulting [[Colorado River Compact]] was signed on November 24, 1922.{{sfn|Hiltzik|2010|pp=81–87}}

Legislation to authorize the dam was introduced repeatedly by two California Republicans, Representative [[Phil Swing]] and Senator [[Hiram Johnson]], but representatives from other parts of the country considered the project as hugely expensive and one that would mostly benefit California. The [[1927 Mississippi flood]] made Midwestern and Southern congressmen and senators more sympathetic toward the dam project. On March 12, 1928, the failure of the [[St. Francis Dam]], constructed by the city of Los Angeles, caused a disastrous flood that killed up to 600 people. As that dam was a curved-gravity type,<ref>{{Cite journal |last= Rogers |first= J. David |date= September 28, 2007 |url= http://web.mst.edu/~rogersda/st_francis_dam/index.htm |title= Impacts of the 1928 St. Francis Dam Failure on Geology, Civil Engineering, and America |journal= 2007 Annual Meeting Association of Environmental and Engineering Geologists |publisher= Missouri University of Science & Technology |access-date= September 29, 2013 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131211184431/http://web.mst.edu/~rogersda/st_francis_dam/index.htm |archive-date= December 11, 2013 |url-status= live }}</ref> similar in design to the arch-gravity as was proposed for the Black Canyon dam, opponents claimed that the Black Canyon dam's safety could not be guaranteed. Congress authorized a board of engineers to review plans for the proposed dam. The Colorado River Board found the project feasible, but warned that should the dam fail, every downstream Colorado River community would be destroyed, and that the river might change course and empty into the Salton Sea. The Board cautioned: "To avoid such possibilities, the proposed dam should be constructed on conservative if not ultra-conservative lines."{{sfn|Rogers|2010}}

On December 21, 1928, [[Calvin Coolidge|President Coolidge]] signed the bill authorizing the dam.{{sfn|Hiltzik|2010|p=118}} The Boulder Canyon Project Act<ref>{{USStatute|70|642|45|1057|1928|12|21|HR|5773}}</ref> appropriated $165&nbsp;million for the project along with the downstream [[Imperial Dam]] and [[All-American Canal]], a replacement for Beatty's canal entirely on the U.S. side of the border.{{sfn|Stevens|1988|p=27}} It also permitted the compact to go into effect when at least six of the seven states approved it. This occurred on March 6, 1929, with Utah's ratification; Arizona did not approve it until 1944.{{sfn|Hiltzik|2010|p=120}}

=== Design, preparation and contracting ===
[[File:Hoover-dam-contour-map.jpg|left|thumb|Hoover Dam architectural plans]]
Even before Congress approved the Boulder Canyon Project, the Bureau of Reclamation was considering what kind of dam should be used. Officials eventually decided on a massive concrete [[arch-gravity dam]], the design of which was overseen by the Bureau's chief design engineer [[John L. Savage]]. The monolithic dam would be thick at the bottom and thin near the top and would present a convex face towards the water above the dam. The curving arch of the dam would transmit the water's force into the abutments, in this case the rock walls of the canyon. The wedge-shaped dam would be {{convert|abbr=on|660|ft}} thick at the bottom, narrowing to {{convert|abbr=on|45|ft}} at the top, leaving room for a highway connecting Nevada and Arizona.{{sfn|Stevens|1988|pp=27–28}}

On January 10, 1931, the Bureau made the bid documents available to interested parties, at five dollars a copy. The government was to provide the materials, and the contractor was to prepare the site and build the dam. The dam was described in minute detail, covering 100&nbsp;pages of text and 76&nbsp;drawings. A $2&nbsp;million [[bid bond]] was to accompany each bid; the winner would have to post a $5&nbsp;million [[performance bond]]. The contractor had seven years to build the dam, or penalties would ensue.{{sfn|Stevens|1988|p=34}}

The [[Wattis Brothers]], heads of the [[Utah Construction Company]], were interested in bidding on the project, but lacked the money for the performance bond. They lacked sufficient resources even in combination with their longtime partners, [[Morrison-Knudsen]], which employed the nation's leading dam builder, [[Frank Crowe]]. They formed a joint venture to bid for the project with Pacific Bridge Company of [[Portland, Oregon]]; [[Henry J. Kaiser]] & W. A. [[Bechtel Corporation|Bechtel Company]] of San Francisco; MacDonald & Kahn Ltd. of Los Angeles; and the [[J.F. Shea Co|J.F. Shea Company]] of Portland, Oregon.{{sfn|Stevens|1988|pp=35–42}} The joint venture was called [[Six Companies, Inc.]] as Bechtel and Kaiser were considered one company for purposes of Six in the name. The name was descriptive and was an inside joke among the San Franciscans in the bid, where "Six Companies" was also a [[Chinese Consolidated Benevolent Association|Chinese benevolent association in the city]].{{sfn|Hiltzik|2010|p=174}} There were three valid bids, and Six Companies' bid of $48,890,955 was the lowest, within $24,000 of the confidential government estimate of what the dam would cost to build, and five million dollars less than the next-lowest bid.{{sfn|Stevens|1988|pp=45–46}}

The city of Las Vegas had lobbied hard to be the headquarters for the dam construction, closing its many [[speakeasy|speakeasies]] when the decision maker, Secretary of the Interior [[Ray Wilbur]], came to town. Instead, Wilbur announced in early 1930 that a model city was to be built in the desert near the dam site. This town became known as [[Boulder City, Nevada]]. Construction of a rail line joining Las Vegas and the dam site began in September 1930.{{sfn|Hiltzik|2010|pp=144–145}}