Editing Haijin (section)

==Ming dynasty==
[[File:Wokou.jpg|right|300px|thumb|A map of [[wokou]] raiding, 14th–16th centuries. The early pirates were mostly based on outlying Japanese islands but targeted the Japanese as well as Korea and Ming China. The later ones were mostly Chinese dispossessed by Ming policy.]]

===Background===
The 14th century was a time of chaos throughout [[East Asia]]. The [[second plague pandemic|second]] [[bubonic plague]] pandemic began in [[Yuan Mongolia|Mongolia]] around 1330{{sfnp|Martin|2001|p=14}} and may have killed the majority of the population in [[Hebei]] and [[Shanxi]] and millions elsewhere.{{sfnp|McNeill|1998}} Another epidemic raged for three years from 1351 to 1354.{{sfnp|McNeill|1998}} Existing revolts over the government salt monopoly and severe floods along the [[Yellow River]] provoked the [[Red Turban Rebellion]]. The declaration of the [[Ming Empire|Ming]] in 1368 did not end its wars with [[Yuan dynasty|Mongol]] remnants under [[Toghon Temür]] in [[Northern Yuan|the north]] and under the [[Basalawarmi|Prince of Liang]] in [[Viceroy of Yun-Gui|the south]]. [[Gongmin of Goryeo|King Gongmin]] of [[Goryeo|Korea]] had begun freeing himself from the Mongols as well, retaking his country's northern provinces, when a [[Red Turban invasions of Goryeo|Red Turban]] invasion devastated the areas and laid waste to [[Pyongyang]]. In Japan, [[Emperor Go-Daigo|Emperor Daigo II]]'s [[Kenmu Restoration]] succeeded in overthrowing the [[Kamakura period|Kamakura shogunate]] but ultimately simply replaced them with the weaker [[Ashikaga shogunate|Ashikaga]].

The loose control over Japan's periphery led to [[wokou|pirates]] setting up bases on the realm's outlying islands,{{sfnp|Wang|1980|p=31}} particularly [[Tsushima Island|Tsushima]], [[Iki Island|Iki]], and the [[Gotō Islands|Gotōs]].<ref name=opa/><ref name=kawazaki/> These [[wokou]] ("Japanese pirates") raided Japan as well as Korea and China.{{sfnp|Wang|1980|p=31}}

As a rebel leader, Zhu Yuanzhang promoted foreign trade as a source of revenue.{{sfnp|Von Glahn|1996|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DNlv4f9tV_AC&pg=PA90 90]}} As the [[Hongwu Emperor]], first of the [[Ming dynasty]], however, he issued the first sea ban in 1371.{{sfnp|Von Glahn|1996|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DNlv4f9tV_AC&pg=PA116 116]}} All foreign trade was to be conducted by official [[Imperial Chinese tributary system|tribute missions]], handled by representatives of the Ming Empire and its "vassal" states.{{sfnp|Von Glahn|1996|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DNlv4f9tV_AC&pg=PA91 91]}}  Private foreign trade was made punishable by death, with the offender's [[collective punishment|family and neighbors exiled]] from their homes.<ref>{{harvp|Li|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=srGEMarSWLYC&pg=PA3 3]}}.</ref> A few years later, in 1384, the Maritime Trade Intendancies (''Shibo Tiju Si'') at [[Ningbo]], [[Guangzhou]], and [[Quanzhou]] were shuttered.{{sfnp|Von Glahn|1996|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DNlv4f9tV_AC&pg=PA116 116]}} Ships, docks, and shipyards were destroyed and ports sabotaged with rocks and pine stakes.<ref name=lifo>{{harvp|Li|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=srGEMarSWLYC&pg=PA4 4]}}.</ref> Although the policy is now associated with imperial China generally, it was then at odds with Chinese tradition, which had pursued foreign trade as a source of revenue and become particularly important under the [[Tang dynasty|Tang]], [[Song dynasty|Song]], and [[Yuan dynasty|Yuan]].<ref name=lifo/>

The [[treasure voyages]] of [[Zheng He]] were partly intended to monopolise overseas trade under the government.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Mote |first1=Frederick W. |last2=Twitchett |first2=Denis |title=The Cambridge History of China Vol. 7: The Ming Dynasty 1368-1644 |url=https://archive.org/details/cambridgehistory07mote |url-access=limited |date=1988 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-24332-2 |pages=270}}</ref> They were discontinued due to a rise in Mongol assertiveness after the Emperor's capture at the [[Battle of Tumu]] in 1449. The large scale of private overseas trade had caused price competition for the Ming government's purchases, such as warhorses for the northern frontier, and funds had to be reallocated. However, after the end of the treasure voyages, Chinese trade in Southeast Asia and the Indian Ocean continued.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Waley-Cohen |first1=Joanna |title=The Sextants of Beijing: Global Currents in Chinese History |date=2000 |publisher=W. W. Norton and Company |location=New York, London |isbn=039324251X |pages=49}}</ref> Private, including unauthorised, Chinese trade in Southeast Asia expanded rapidly in the second half of the Ming dynasty.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Mote |first1=Frederick W. |last2=Twitchett |first2=Denis |title=The Cambridge History of China Vol. 7: The Ming Dynasty 1368-1644 |url=https://archive.org/details/cambridgehistory07mote |url-access=limited |date=1988 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-24332-2 |pages=256}}</ref>

A 1613 edict prohibited maritime trade between the lands north and south of the Yangtze River, attempting to put a stop to captains claiming to be heading to Jiangsu and then diverting to Japan.{{sfnp|Von Glahn|1996|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DNlv4f9tV_AC&pg=PA281 281]}}

===Rationale===
Although the policy has generally been ascribed to national defense against the pirates,{{sfnp|Von Glahn|1996|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DNlv4f9tV_AC&pg=PA90 90]}} it was so obviously counterproductive and yet carried on for so long that other explanations have been offered. The initial conception seems to have been to use the Japanese need for Chinese goods to force them to terms.<ref name=litt/> The Hongwu emperor seemed to indicate that the policy was designed to prevent foreign nations from collaborating with his subjects to challenge his rule; for instance, Srivijaya was banned from trading as the emperor suspected them of spying.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Mote |first1=Frederick W. |last2=Twitchett |first2=Denis |title=The Cambridge History of China Vol. 7: The Ming Dynasty 1368-1644 |url=https://archive.org/details/cambridgehistory07mote |url-access=limited |date=1988 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-24332-2 |pages=169}}</ref> The usage of trade was also a powerful tool to entice foreign governments to abide by the tributary system and pressure uncooperative leaders.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Mote |first1=Frederick W. |last2=Twitchett |first2=Denis |title=The Cambridge History of China Vol. 7: The Ming Dynasty 1368-1644 |url=https://archive.org/details/cambridgehistory07mote |url-access=limited |date=1988 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-24332-2 |pages=396}}</ref> Parallels with Song and Yuan measures restricting outflows of [[bullion]] have led some to argue that it was intended to support the Hongwu Emperor's [[Ming currency|printing of fiat currency]],{{sfnp|Von Glahn|1996|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DNlv4f9tV_AC&pg=PA90 90]}} whose use was continued by his successors as late as 1450. (By 1425, rampant [[counterfeit]]ing and [[hyperinflation]] meant people were already trading at about 0.014% of their original value.){{sfnp|Fairbank & al.|2006|p=134}} Others assert that it was a side effect of a desire to elevate [[Confucianism|Confucian]] [[ren (Confucianism)|humaneness]] ({{lang|zh|{{linktext|仁}}}}, ''ren'') and eliminate greed from the realm's foreign relations{{sfnp|Li|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=srGEMarSWLYC&pg=PA24 24–5]}} or a ploy to weaken the realm's southern subjects to the benefit of the central government.<ref name="Embree">{{citation |last1=Embree |first1=Ainslie Thomas |author1-link=Ainslie Embree |last2=Gluck |first2=Carol |author-link2=Carol Gluck |display-authors=1 |ref={{harvid|Embree & al.|1997}} |title=Asia in Western and World History: A Guide for Teaching |year=1997 |publisher=M.E. Sharpe |location=[[Armonk, New York|Armonk]] |isbn=978-1-56324-264-9 |oclc=32349203 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/asiainwesternwor00ains }}.</ref> Nonetheless, it may have been the case that the Hongwu Emperor prioritized protecting his state against the [[Northern Yuan dynasty|Northern Yuan]] remnants, leaving the policy and its local enforcers as the most he could accomplish<ref>{{harvp|Li|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=srGEMarSWLYC&pg=PA12 12]}}.</ref> and his mention of them in his ''[[Ancestral Injunctions]]''<ref name=lifo/> as responsible for their continuation.

===Effects===
The policy offered too little—decennial tribute missions comprising only two ships—as a reward for good behavior and enticement for Japanese authorities to root out their smugglers and pirates.<ref name=litt/> The Hongwu Emperor's message to the [[Ashikaga shogunate|Japanese]] that his army would "capture and exterminate your bandits, head straight for your country, and put your [[emperor of Japan|king]] in bonds"{{sfnp|Kang|2007|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=C7dPlL7_yi4C&pg=PA28 28]}} received the [[Ashikaga shogunate|Ashikaga shogun]]'s reply that "your great empire may be able to invade Japan but our small state is not short of a strategy to defend ourselves".<ref name=litt>{{harvp|Li|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=srGEMarSWLYC&pg=PA13 13]}}.</ref>

Although the sea ban left the Ming army free to extirpate the remaining Yuan loyalists and secure China's borders, it tied up local resources. 74 coastal garrisons were established from Guangzhou in [[Guangdong]] to [[Shandong]];<ref name=lifo/> under the [[Yongle Emperor]], these outposts were notionally manned by 110,000 subjects.<ref name=cai>{{citation |last=Tsai |first=Henry Shih-shan |date=2001 |title=Perpetual Happiness: The Ming Emperor Yongle |publisher=University of Washington Press |isbn=0-295-98124-5 }}.</ref> The loss of income from taxes on trade<ref name=lifo/> contributed to chronic funding difficulties throughout the Ming, particularly for [[Zhejiang]] and [[Fujian]] provinces.{{sfnp|Shi|2006|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=mLBgaa8d4aMC&pg=PA7 7]}} By impoverishing and provoking both coastal Chinese and Japanese against the regime,<ref name=litt/> it increased the problem it was purporting to solve.<ref name=list>{{harvp|Li|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=srGEMarSWLYC&pg=PA17 17]}}.</ref> The initial wave of Japanese pirates had been independently dealt with by [[Chŏng Mong-ju]] and [[Imagawa Sadayo]], who returned their booty and slaves to Korea;<ref name=opa>{{citation |last=Ōta |first=Kōki |title=''『倭寇: 日本あふれ活動史』 [''Wakō: Nihon Afure Katsudōshi'']'' |publisher=Bungeisha |date=2004 |page=98 }}. {{in lang|ja}}</ref><ref name=kawazaki>{{citation |last=Kawazoe |first=Shōji |title=''「対外関係の史的展開」 [''Taigai Kankei no Shiteki Tenkai'']'' |publisher=Bunken Shuppan |date=1996 |page=167 }}. {{in lang|ja}}</ref> [[Ashikaga Yoshimitsu]] delivered 20 more to China in 1405, which boiled them alive in a cauldron in [[Ningbo]].<ref>{{citation |first=Yosaburō |last=Takekoshi |title=The Economic Aspects of the History of the Civilization of Japan |date=1967 |page=344 }}.</ref> However, the raids on China continued, most grievously under the [[Jiajing Emperor]].{{sfnp|Shi|2006|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=mLBgaa8d4aMC&pg=PA7 7]}} By the 16th century, the "Japanese", "[[Wokou|dwarf]]", and "[[dongyi|eastern barbarian]]" pirates of the [[Jiajing wokou raids]] were mostly non-Japanese.{{sfnp|Wang|1980|p=31}}<ref name=list/><ref>{{harvp|Li|2010|[https://books.google.com/books?id=srGEMarSWLYC&pg=PA11 11]}}</ref>

Nonetheless, because the sea ban was added by the Hongwu Emperor to his ''[[Ancestral Injunctions]]'',<ref name=lifo/> it continued to be broadly kept through most of the rest of his dynasty. For the next two centuries, the rich farmland of the south and the military theaters of the north were linked almost solely by the [[Jinghang Canal]].<ref>{{harvp|Li|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=srGEMarSWLYC&pg=PA168 168]}}.</ref> Bribery and disinterest occasionally permitted more leeway, as when the [[Portuguese Empire|Portuguese]] began trading at Guangzhou (1517), [[Shuangyu]] ("Liampo"), and [[Quanzhou]] ("Chincheu"),{{sfnp|''Knight's''|1841|p=[https://archive.org/details/b22013325/page/136 136]}} but crackdowns also occurred, as with the expulsion of the Portuguese in the 1520s, on the islands off Ningbo and [[Zhangzhou]] in 1547, or at [[Yuegang]] in 1549.{{sfnp|Von Glahn|1996|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DNlv4f9tV_AC&pg=PA117 117]}} The Portuguese were permitted to settle at [[Portuguese Macao|Macao]] in 1557, but only after several years of helping the Chinese suppress piracy.{{sfnp|Von Glahn|1996|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DNlv4f9tV_AC&pg=PA118 118]}}

The sea ban was largely unenforceable from its earliest years, and no effective enforcement was ever implemented. Local authorities themselves were frequently involved in the illicit trade, and usually ignored edicts to restrict trade. Military officers brokered trade deals and the wealthy families in the coastal settlements depended on its income. Ordinary workers found employment in trade-related industries. Many of the official posts to enforce trade regulations were left vacant and the Maritime Trading Intendancies were abolished. The court generally ignored the issue of overseas trade. In the 1520s the emperor rejected all attempts to halt the trade as these came from officials who had opposed the emperor's policy of rituals, and very little trade took place under governmental channels instead of illicit means. The Grand secretary of the court in the 1530s was from coastal Zhejiang province, and he proceeded to block any attempt to enforce the sea ban.  The most significant attempt to crush out the illicit trade was made by [[Zhu Wan]], an official appointed by the court in the 1540s, but just as he was making headway in wiping out the smugglers he was removed by the court on accusations of unauthorised killings.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Mote |first1=Frederick W. |last2=Twitchett |first2=Denis |title=The Cambridge History of China Vol. 7: The Ming Dynasty 1368-1644 |url=https://archive.org/details/cambridgehistory07mote |url-access=limited |date=1988 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-24332-2 |pages=168–169, 302, 396, 490–495, 509}}</ref>

Piracy dropped to negligible levels only after the general abolition of the policy in 1567{{sfnp|Deng|1999}} upon the ascension of the [[Longqing Emperor]] and at the urging of the [[governor of Fujian]] Tu Zemin. Chinese merchants for both maritime and overland trade could apply for permits to engage in all foreign trade except with Japan (although some still traded there anyway, and Japanese traders also set themselves up in Southeast Asia to trade with incoming Chinese)<ref>{{cite book |last1=Kangying Li |title=The Ming Maritime Trade Policy in Transition, 1368 to 1567 |date=2010 |publisher=Otto Harrassowitz Verlag |isbn=9783447061728 |page=177}}</ref> or involving weapons or other contraband goods; these included iron, sulfur, and copper. The number of foreign traders was capped by a license and quota system; no trading could take them away from China for longer than a year.{{sfnp|Von Glahn|1996|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DNlv4f9tV_AC&pg=PA118 118]}} Maritime trade intendancies were reëstablished at Guangzhou and Ningbo in 1599, and Chinese merchants turned Yuegang (modern [[Haicheng, Fujian|Haicheng]], Fujian) into a thriving port.{{sfnp|Shi|2006|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=mLBgaa8d4aMC&pg=PA7 7]}}{{sfnp|Von Glahn|1996|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DNlv4f9tV_AC&pg=PA118 118]}} The end of the sea ban did not mark an imperial change of heart, however, so much as a recognition that the weakness of the later Ming state made it impossible to continue the prohibition. The state continued to attempt to regulate trade as heavily as it could, and foreigners were restricted to doing business through approved agents, with prohibitions against any direct business with ordinary Chinese.{{sfnp|Shi|2006|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=mLBgaa8d4aMC&pg=PA8 8]}} Accommodations could be made, but were slow in coming: the merchants of Yuegang were trading heavily with the Spanish within a year of [[Kingdom of Maynila|Maynila]]'s 1570 [[Spanish conquest of the Philippines|conquest]] by [[Martín de Goiti]]{{sfnp|Von Glahn|1996|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DNlv4f9tV_AC&pg=PA118 118]}} but it wasn't until 1589 that the throne approved the city's requests for more merchant licenses to expand the trade.{{sfnp|Von Glahn|1996|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DNlv4f9tV_AC&pg=PA119 119]}} Fu Yuanchu's 1639 memorial to the throne made the case that trade between [[Fujian]] and [[Dutch Formosa]] had made the ban entirely unworkable.{{sfnp|Von Glahn|1996|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DNlv4f9tV_AC&pg=PA281 281]}}

The lifting of the sea ban coincided with the arrival of the first Spanish galleons from the Americas, creating a global trade link that would not be interrupted until the following century.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Mote |first1=Frederick W. |last2=Twitchett |first2=Denis |title=The Cambridge History of China Vol. 7: The Ming Dynasty 1368-1644 |url=https://archive.org/details/cambridgehistory07mote |url-access=limited |date=1988 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-24332-2 |pages=504–505}}</ref>

=== China in the global trading system ===
{{see also|Global silver trade from the 16th to 18th centuries}}
China acted as the cog running the wheel of global trade.<ref name="Flynn 2002 391–427">{{Cite journal|last1=Flynn|first1=Dennis Owen|last2=Giraldez|first2=Arturo|date=2002|title=Cycles of Silver: Global Economic Unity through the Mid-Eighteenth Century|journal=Journal of World History|volume=13|issue=2|pages=391–427|doi=10.1353/jwh.2002.0035|s2cid=145805906|issn=1527-8050}}</ref> Trade with Japan continued unobstructed despite the embargo, through Chinese smugglers, Southeast Asian ports, or Portuguese. China was entirely integrated in the world trading system.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Waley-Cohen |first1=Joanna |title=The Sextants of Beijing: Global Currents in Chinese History |date=2000 |publisher=W. W. Norton and Company |location=New York, London |isbn=039324251X |pages=52–54}}</ref>

European nations had a great desire for Chinese goods such as [[silk industry in China|silk]] and [[porcelain]].<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last1=Flynn|first1=Dennis O.|last2=Giráldez|first2=Arturo|date=1995|title=Born with a "Silver Spoon": The Origin of World Trade in 1571|journal=Journal of World History|volume=6|issue=2|pages=201–221|jstor=20078638}}</ref> The Europeans did not have any goods or commodities which China desired, so they traded silver to make up for their trade deficit.<ref name=":3">{{Cite book|title=Reorient|last=Frank|first=Andre|date=July 1998|publisher=University of California Press |isbn=9780520214743|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/reorient00andr}}</ref> Spaniards at the time of the [[Age of Discovery|Age of Exploration]] discovered vast amounts of silver, much of which was from the [[Potosí]] silver mines, to fuel their trade economy. Spanish American silver mines were the world's cheapest sources of it,<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=011/llsl011.db&recNum=184|title=A Century of Lawmaking|website=Library of Congress|access-date=May 23, 2018}}</ref> producing 40,000 tons of silver in 200 years.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Silver, Trade, and War: Spain and America in the Making of Early Modern Europe|url=https://archive.org/details/silvertradewarsp00stei|url-access=limited|last1=Stein|first1=Stanley J.|last2=Stein|first2=Barbara H.|publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press|year=2000|pages=[https://archive.org/details/silvertradewarsp00stei/page/n32 21]|isbn=9780801861352 }}</ref> The ultimate destination for the mass amounts of silver produced in the Americas and Japan was China.<ref name=":7">{{Cite journal|last1=Flynn|first1=Dennis O.|last2=Giráldez|first2=Arturo|date=2002|title=Cycles of Silver: Global Economic Unity through the Mid-Eighteenth Century|journal=Journal of World History|volume=13|issue=2|pages=391–427|jstor=20078977|doi=10.1353/jwh.2002.0035|s2cid=145805906}}</ref> From 1500 to 1800, Mexico and Peru produced about 80%<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Flynn|first=Dennis O.|date=1995|title=Born with a "Silver Spoon": The Origin of World Trade in 1571|journal=Journal of World History|publisher=University of Hawaii Press}}</ref> of the world's silver with 30% of it eventually ending up in China.  In the late 16th and early 17th century, Japan was also exporting silver heavily into China.<ref name=":0" /> Silver from the Americas flowed mostly across the Atlantic and made its way to the far east.<ref name=":3" /> Major outposts for the silver trade were located in Southeast Asian countries, such as the Philippines.<ref name=":8">{{Cite journal|last1=Flynn|first1=Dennis O.|last2=Giraldez|first2=Arturo|date=1996|title=Silk for Silver: Manila-Macao Trade in the 17th Century|journal=Philippine Studies|volume=44|issue=1|pages=52–68|jstor=42634185}}</ref> The city of Manila served as a primary outpost of the exchange of goods between the Americas, Japan, India, Indonesia and China.<ref name=":8" /> However, there was a large amount of silver that crossed across the Pacific Ocean directly from the Americas as well.<ref name=":7" /> 

Trade with Ming China via Manila served a major source of revenue for the [[Spanish Empire]] and as a fundamental source of income for Spanish colonists in the Philippine Islands. Until 1593, two or more ships would set sail annually from each port.<ref>Schurz, William Lytle. ''The Manila Galleon'', 1939. P 193.</ref> The galleon trade was supplied by merchants largely from port areas of Fujian who traveled to Manila to sell the Spaniards spices, [[porcelain]], [[ivory]], [[lacquerware]], processed [[silk]] cloth and other valuable commodities. Cargoes varied from one voyage to another but often included goods from all over Asia - jade, wax, gunpowder and silk from China; amber, cotton and rugs from India; spices from Indonesia and Malaysia; and a variety of goods from Japan, including fans, chests, screens and porcelain.<ref name="Mejia">{{cite journal |last1=Mejia |first1=Javier |title=The Economics of the Manila Galleon |publisher=New York University, Abu Dhabi}}</ref>