Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Grammatical aspect
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Basic concept== ===History=== The Indian linguist [[Yaska]] ({{circa|7th century BCE}}) dealt with grammatical aspect, distinguishing actions that are processes (''bhāva''), from those where the action is considered as a completed whole (''mūrta''). This is the key distinction between the imperfective and perfective. Yaska also applied this distinction to a verb versus an action nominal.{{Citation needed|date=August 2011}} Grammarians of the Greek and Latin languages also showed an interest in aspect, but the idea did not enter into the modern Western grammatical tradition until the 19th century via the study of the grammar of the [[Slavic languages]]. The earliest use of the term recorded in the [[Oxford English Dictionary]] dates from 1853.<ref name="Binnick1991"> {{cite book|author=Robert I. Binnick|title=Time and the verb: a guide to tense and aspect|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=A1fSUowGY8kC&pg=PA135|year=1991|publisher=Oxford University Press US|isbn=978-0-19-506206-9|pages=135–6 |access-date=12 August 2011}} </ref> ===Modern usage=== Aspect is often confused with the closely related concept of [[Grammatical tense|tense]], because they both convey information about time. While tense relates the time of [[referent]] to some other time, commonly the speech event, aspect conveys other temporal information, such as duration, completion, or frequency, as it relates to the time of action. Thus tense refers to {{em|temporally when}} while aspect refers to {{em|temporally how}}. Aspect can be said to describe the texture of the time in which a situation occurs, such as a single point of time, a continuous range of time, a sequence of discrete points in time, etc., whereas tense indicates its location in time. For example, consider the following sentences: "I eat", "I am eating", "I have eaten", and "I have been eating". All are in the [[present tense]], indicated by the present-tense verb of each sentence (''eat'', ''am'', and ''have''). Yet since they differ in aspect, each conveys different information or points of view as to how the action pertains to the present. Grammatical aspect is a {{em|formal}} property of a [[language]], distinguished through overt [[inflection]], [[derivational affix]]es, or independent words that serve as grammatically required [[marker (linguistics)|marker]]s of those aspects. For example, the [[Kʼicheʼ language]] spoken in Guatemala has the inflectional prefixes {{lang|quc|k}}- and {{lang|quc|x}}- to mark [[Incompletive aspect|incompletive]] and [[completive aspect]];<ref name="pye1">{{cite journal | journal=Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics |editor1=Stacey Stowers |editor2=Nathan Poell | volume=26 | year=2008 | last=Pye | first=Clifton | publisher=University of Kansas |title=Mayan Morphosyntax}}</ref><ref name="pye2">Pye, Clifton (2001). "The Acquisition of Finiteness in Kʼicheʼ Maya". ''BUCLD 25: Proceedings of the 25th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development'', pp. 645–656. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.</ref> [[Mandarin Chinese]] has the aspect markers -{{translit|cmn|le}} {{lang|cmn|了}}, -{{translit|cmn|zhe}} {{lang|cmn|着}}, {{translit|cmn|zài}}- {{lang|cmn|在}}, and -{{translit|cmn|guò}} {{lang|cmn|过}} to mark the [[perfective]], [[durative]] [[Stative verb|stative]], durative [[Progressive aspect|progressive]], and [[Experiential aspect|experiential]] aspects,<ref name="lithomp">Li, Charles, and Sandra Thompson (1981). "Aspect". ''Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar''. Los Angeles: University of California Press. pp. 184–237.</ref> and also marks aspect with [[adverb]]s;<ref name="zhangandzhang">{{cite journal | last1=Zhang | first1=Yaxu | last2=Zhang | first2=Jingting | s2cid=35873020 | title=Brain responses to agreement violations of Chinese grammatical aspect | date=2 July 2008 | journal=[[NeuroReport]] | volume=19 | issue=10 | pmid=18580575 | doi=10.1097/WNR.0b013e328302f14f | pages=1039–43}}</ref> and English marks the [[continuous aspect]] with the verb ''to be'' coupled with [[present participle]] and the [[perfect (grammar)|perfect]] with the verb ''to have'' coupled with [[past participle]]. Even languages that do not mark aspect [[Morphology (linguistics)|morphologically]] or through [[auxiliary verb]]s, however, can convey such distinctions by the use of adverbs or other [[Syntax|syntactic]] constructions.<ref name="gabriele">{{cite journal | last=Gabriele | first=Alison | title=Transfer and Transition in the L2 Acquisition of Aspect | year=2008 | journal=Studies in Second Language Acquisition | pages=6}}</ref> Grammatical aspect is distinguished from [[lexical aspect]] or ''Aktionsart'', which is an inherent feature of verbs or verb phrases and is determined by the nature of the situation that the verb describes.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Grammatical aspect
(section)
Add topic