Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Gambler's fallacy
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Examples== ===Coin toss=== [[File:Lawoflargenumbersanimation.gif|thumb|Over time, the [[ratio|proportion]] of red/blue coin tosses approaches 50-50, but the [[subtraction|difference]] decreases to zero non-systematically.]] The gambler's fallacy can be illustrated by considering the repeated toss of a [[fair coin]]. The outcomes in different tosses are [[statistically independent]] and the probability of getting heads on a single toss is {{sfrac|1|2}} (one in two). The probability of getting two heads in two tosses is {{sfrac|1|4}} (one in four) and the probability of getting three heads in three tosses is {{sfrac|1|8}} (one in eight). In general, if ''A<sub>i</sub>'' is the event where toss ''i'' of a [[fair coin]] comes up heads, then: :<math>\Pr\left(\bigcap_{i=1}^n A_i\right)=\prod_{i=1}^n \Pr(A_i)={1\over2^n}</math>. If after tossing four heads in a row, the next coin toss also came up heads, it would complete a run of five successive heads. Since the probability of a run of five successive heads is {{sfrac|1|32}} (one in thirty-two), a person might believe that the next flip would be more likely to come up tails rather than heads again. This is incorrect and is an example of the gambler's fallacy. The event "5 heads in a row" and the event "first 4 heads, then a tails" are equally likely, each having probability {{sfrac|1|32}}. Since the first four tosses turn up heads, the probability that the next toss is a head is: :<math>\Pr\left(A_5|A_1 \cap A_2 \cap A_3 \cap A_4 \right)=\Pr\left(A_5\right)=\frac{1}{2}</math>. While a run of five heads has a probability of {{sfrac|1|32}} = 0.03125 (a little over 3%), the misunderstanding lies in not realizing that this is the case ''only before the first coin is tossed''. After the first four tosses in this example, the results are no longer unknown, so their probabilities are at that point equal to 1 (100%). The probability of a run of coin tosses of any length continuing for one more toss is always 0.5. The reasoning that a fifth toss is more likely to be tails because the previous four tosses were heads, with a run of luck in the past influencing the odds in the future, forms the basis of the fallacy. ===Why the probability is {{sfrac|1|2}} for a fair coin=== If a fair coin is flipped 21 times, the probability of 21 heads is 1 in 2,097,152. The probability of flipping a head after having already flipped 20 heads in a row is {{sfrac|1|2}}. Assuming a fair coin: * The probability of 20 heads, then 1 tail is 0.5<sup>20</sup> Γ 0.5 = 0.5<sup>21</sup> * The probability of 20 heads, then 1 head is 0.5<sup>20</sup> Γ 0.5 = 0.5<sup>21</sup> The probability of getting 20 heads then 1 tail, and the probability of getting 20 heads then another head are both 1 in 2,097,152. When flipping a fair coin 21 times, the outcome is equally likely to be 21 heads as 20 heads and then 1 tail. These two outcomes are equally as likely as any of the other combinations that can be obtained from 21 flips of a coin. All of the 21-flip combinations will have probabilities equal to 0.5<sup>21</sup>, or 1 in 2,097,152. Assuming that a change in the probability will occur as a result of the outcome of prior flips is incorrect because every outcome of a 21-flip sequence is as likely as the other outcomes. In accordance with [[Bayes' theorem]], the likely outcome of each flip is the probability of the fair coin, which is {{sfrac|1|2}}. ===Other examples=== The fallacy leads to the incorrect notion that previous failures will create an increased probability of success on subsequent attempts. For a fair 16-sided die, the probability of each outcome occurring is {{sfrac|1|16}} (6.25%). If a win is defined as rolling a 1, the probability of a 1 occurring at least once in 16 rolls is: :<math>1-\left[\frac{15}{16}\right]^{16} \,=\, 64.39\%</math> The probability of a loss on the first roll is {{sfrac|15|16}} (93.75%). According to the fallacy, the player should have a higher chance of winning after one loss has occurred. The probability of at least one win is now: :<math>1-\left[\frac{15}{16}\right]^{15} \,=\, 62.02\%</math> By losing one toss, the player's probability of winning drops by two percentage points. With 5 losses and 11 rolls remaining, the probability of winning drops to around 0.5 (50%). The probability of at least one win does not increase after a series of losses; indeed, the probability of success ''actually decreases'', because there are fewer trials left in which to win. The probability of winning will eventually be equal to the probability of winning a single toss, which is {{sfrac|1|16}} (6.25%) and occurs when only one toss is left.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Gambler's fallacy
(section)
Add topic