Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Functional predicate
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Introducing new function symbols== In a treatment of [[predicate logic]] that allows one to introduce new predicate symbols, one will also want to be able to introduce new function symbols. Given the function symbols ''F'' and ''G'', one can introduce a new function symbol ''F'' β ''G'', the ''[[function composition|composition]]'' of ''F'' and ''G'', satisfying (''F'' β ''G'')(''X'') = ''F''(''G''(''X'')), [[for all]] ''X''. Of course, the right side of this equation doesn't make sense in typed logic unless the domain type of ''F'' matches the codomain type of ''G'', so this is required for the composition to be defined. One also gets certain function symbols automatically. In untyped logic, there is an ''identity predicate'' id that satisfies id(''X'') = ''X'' for all ''X''. In typed logic, given any type '''T''', there is an identity predicate id<sub>'''T'''</sub> with domain and codomain type '''T'''; it satisfies id<sub>'''T'''</sub>(''X'') = ''X'' for all ''X'' of type '''T'''. Similarly, if '''T''' is a [[Subtyping|subtype]] of '''U''', then there is an inclusion predicate of domain type '''T''' and codomain type '''U''' that satisfies the same equation; there are additional function symbols associated with other ways of constructing new types out of old ones. Additionally, one can define functional predicates after proving an appropriate [[theorem]]. (If you're working in a [[formal system]] that doesn't allow you to introduce new symbols after proving theorems, then you will have to use relation symbols to get around this, as in the next section.) Specifically, if you can prove that for every ''X'' (or every ''X'' of a certain type), [[there exists]] a [[unique (mathematics)|unique]] ''Y'' satisfying some condition ''P'', then you can introduce a function symbol ''F'' to indicate this. Note that ''P'' will itself be a relational [[predicate (logic)|predicate]] involving both ''X'' and ''Y''. So if there is such a predicate ''P'' and a theorem: : For all ''X'' of type '''T''', for some unique ''Y'' of type '''U''', ''P''(''X'',''Y''), then you can introduce a function symbol ''F'' of domain type '''T''' and codomain type '''U''' that satisfies: : For all ''X'' of type '''T''', for all ''Y'' of type '''U''', ''P''(''X'',''Y'') [[if and only if]] ''Y'' = ''F''(''X'').
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Functional predicate
(section)
Add topic