Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Environmental tax
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Categories of Environmental Taxes == The term, environmental tax, encompasses an array of different types of taxes used to internalize negative environmental externalities, promote sustainable development, support environmental preservation, and generate revenue. Specifically, environmental taxes can be divided into four main categories, under which all the ecotaxes fall. The categories are energy, transport, pollution and resource taxes.<ref>{{Citation |title=Environmental taxes and charges in the EU |date=1998-06-04 |work=New Instruments for Environmental Policy in the EU |pages=256–274 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203443873-19 |access-date=2024-04-22 |publisher=Routledge|doi=10.4324/9780203443873-19 |isbn=978-0-429-23199-5 }}</ref> === Energy Taxes === The first type of ecotax, energy taxes, can vary greatly as they can be levied on the production, distribution, or consumption of energy sources, particularly fossil fuels like coal, oil, natural gas, and sometimes electricity.{{Cn|date=December 2024|reason=need cite that an electricity tax is ecotax or delete electricity}} They are often aimed at influencing energy consumption patterns and behaviors, promoting energy efficiency, and encouraging the transition to cleaner and more sustainable energy sources. For example, they can influence energy consumption by levying larger ecotax rates on nonrenewable energy sources, which have a greater negative impact on the environment and contribute to high levels of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. This reduces the demand for unclean energy sources, and it can make renewable energy sources relatively more competitive, encouraging investment and consumption in clean energy technologies like solar, wind, hydroelectric, and geothermal power. Globally, the most commonly used environmental taxes fall in the category of “energy” taxes. Energy taxes can be narrowed down further to “energy taxes for stationary purposes”, such as taxes on natural gas, coal and biofuels, “energy taxes for transport”, with petrol and diesel as the two most relevant examples, and lastly “greenhouse gasses”. Apart from the most common energy tax, carbon tax, another popular energy tax is the “coal excise tax” in the United States. The tax is levied on the producers, at the coal’s initial sale. Currently, the tax rate, after being increased by over 50% in 2020, is $1.10 per ton for coal from subsurface mines and $0.55 per ton for coal from surface mines.<ref>{{Cite journal |title=Table 177. Germany Non-tax revenue, capital revenue and grants, Table 178. Greece Non-tax revenue, capital revenue and grants |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/426004265887 |access-date=2024-04-22 |doi=10.1787/426004265887 }}</ref>{{Request quotation|date=December 2024|reason=is there really still a coal tax in USA?}}The revenue is generated for a more specific purpose, which is to fund the Black Lung Program and the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund. These entities pay benefits to miners who suffer from black lung disease. The tax continues to generate hundreds of millions of dollars each year despite the coal [[mining industry]] contracting, as the yearly revenue has shrunk from $644 million in 2008 to $177 million in 2022.<ref>{{Cite web |title=SOI Tax Stats - Excise Tax Statistics {{!}} Internal Revenue Service |url=https://www.irs.gov/statistics/soi-tax-stats-excise-tax-statistics |access-date=2024-04-22 |website=www.irs.gov |language=en}}</ref> It is important to note that governments, when imposing ecotaxes for the central purpose of revenue, generally tend to prefer energy taxes when levying environmental taxes due to the fact that energy demand tends to be quite inelastic in the short run, meaning that the government can use such taxes to gain immense revenue. This revenue can be used to reduce the budget deficit, where the majority of it goes to the general fund. However, the revenue earned can also be used to subsidize positive externality generating activities, which is called the “double dividend” of environmental tax.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Goulder |first=Lawrence H. |date=1995-08-01 |title=Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader's guide |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877495 |journal=International Tax and Public Finance |language=en |volume=2 |issue=2 |pages=157–183 |doi=10.1007/BF00877495 |issn=1573-6970}}</ref> Furthermore, these taxes can reduce deadweight losses caused by negative externalities. For such reasons, many economists support energy taxes along with Environmentalists, where activists often highlight the importance of energy taxes in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating the impact of climate change, while economists highlight the benefits of the taxes on the economy.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Tan |first1=Zhe |last2=Wu |first2=Yufeng |last3=Gu |first3=Yifan |last4=Liu |first4=Tingting |last5=Wang |first5=Wei |last6=Liu |first6=Xiaomin |date=2022-01-01 |title=An overview on implementation of environmental tax and related economic instruments in typical countries |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652621038658 |journal=Journal of Cleaner Production |volume=330 |pages=129688 |doi=10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129688 |bibcode=2022JCPro.33029688T |issn=0959-6526}}</ref> Opponents, however, argue such taxes increase the cost of daily necessities, which harm the average consumer, especially those under the poverty line.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Energy Tax: What It Is, How It Works, Other Purposes |url=https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/energy-tax.asp |access-date=2024-04-22 |website=Investopedia |language=en}}</ref> Additionally, a strong argument against energy taxes is that they can be counterproductive, as it may encourage producers who are being taxed to relocate to countries in which there are weaker, or nonexistent energy taxes. This would negatively impact the domestic economy, as well as the climate, as a result of overambitious energy taxes. This is known as carbon leakage.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Wingender |first1=Philippe |last2=Misch |first2=Florian |date=2021 |title=Revisiting Carbon Leakage |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4026406 |journal=SSRN Electronic Journal |doi=10.2139/ssrn.4026406 |issn=1556-5068}}</ref>{{Better cite|reason=The current source is a working paper. Has the research been finished and published?|date=December 2024}} === Transport Taxes === The second most notable form of environmental tax globally is transport taxes. Such taxes range from being implemented on airplane tickets, to car purchases, or even motor registration. Transport fuels are, however, included in energy taxes.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Eskeland |first=Gunnar |date=1999-11-30 |title=Environmental Protection and Optimal Taxation |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2510 |journal=Policy Research Working Papers |doi=10.1596/1813-9450-2510 |issn=1813-9450|hdl=10986/19755 |hdl-access=free }}</ref>{{Clarify|reason=sentence is a bit confusing - I understand international jet fuel is not always taxed|date=December 2024}}The category mostly consists of taxes on the usage or ownership of vehicles. An example of a common transport tax is the tax placed on vehicle registration. This tax is levied on registrations based on factors such as weight, fuel efficiency, or emissions, and it is used to both generate revenue, and to promote the ownership and usage of cleaner, and more fuel efficient vehicles. Another example is the tax imposed on cars entering areas of congestion, such as certain areas in New York City, and this can even be coupled with an additional ecotax on the usage of certain roads, for example through electronic tolling systems. Collectively, energy and transportation taxes make up the majority of the ecotaxes imposed globally.<ref name=":0">{{Citation |title=Environmental taxes and charges in the EU |date=1998-06-04 |work=New Instruments for Environmental Policy in the EU |pages=256–274 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203443873-19 |access-date=2024-04-22 |publisher=Routledge|doi=10.4324/9780203443873-19 |isbn=978-0-429-23199-5 }}</ref> In 2021, the two taxes made up 96% of the ecotaxes implemented in the EU.<ref>{{Cite journal |date=2005-04-08 |title=Summary of national statistics (Eurostat) |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/9789289336604-9-en |access-date=2024-04-22 |doi=10.6027/9789289336604-9-en }}</ref> The remaining 3% is made up of pollution and resource taxes. === Resource and Pollution Taxes === Pollution taxes incorporate taxes on measured emissions to air and water, and the management of waste and noise pollution. An exception is CO<sub>2</sub> taxes.<ref name=":0" /> A successful pollution ecotax is the “plastic bag tax” in Ireland. The country levies a €0.22 tax on plastic bags at the point of sale, with the hope of reducing consumption by reducing the demand for the bags due to the increase in cost. They successfully changed the consumer's behavior, as can seen by the increase in the use of paper bags, a greener substitute, and due to the fall of plastic bags' contribution to the total litter pollution in Ireland from 5% to 0.13% in 14 years. It has also generated over €200 million in revenue, proving to be a huge revenue source for the government.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Plastic Bag Levy |url=https://www.sdcc.ie/en/services/environment/recycling-and-waste/waste-regulations/plastic-bag-levy/https://www.sdcc.ie/en/services/environment/recycling-and-waste/waste-regulations/plastic-bag-levy/plastic-bag-levy.html |access-date=2024-04-22 |website=SDCC |language=en}}</ref> The final categorization of ecotaxes, and arguably the least important form of ecotaxes is resource taxes. Within the category of resource ecotaxes lie taxes associated with the extraction or utilization of natural resources like water, forests, wildlife, and other forms of flora and fauna. These levies are imposed on activities leading to the depletion of natural resources.<ref>{{Citation |title=Environmental taxes and charges in the EU |date=1998-06-04 |work=New Instruments for Environmental Policy in the EU |pages=256–274 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203443873-19 |access-date=2024-04-22 |publisher=Routledge|doi=10.4324/9780203443873-19 |isbn=978-0-429-23199-5 }}</ref> Resource taxes are the least prevalent ecotaxes. Resource depletion is usually covered by government fees, for example, determined by the amount and the type of resource extracted, as opposed to imposed taxes.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Environmental tax
(section)
Add topic