Editing Bookmarklet (section)

== History ==

Steve Kangas of bookmarklets.com coined the word ''bookmarklet''<ref name="bookmarklets.com">{{cite web |url=http://www.bookmarklets.com |title=Bookmarklets |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090707090113/http://www.bookmarklets.com/ |archive-date=2009-07-07 |url-status=live}} registered 9 April 1998</ref> when he started to create short scripts based on a suggestion in [[Netscape Communications Corporation|Netscape's]] JavaScript guide.<ref>{{cite web|title=Activating JavaScript Commands From the Personal Toolbar|url=http://developer.netscape.com/docs/manuals/communicator/jsguide/misc.htm#1005712|work=What's New in JavaScript 1.2|publisher=Netscape Communications Corporation|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020611183734/http://developer.netscape.com/docs/manuals/communicator/jsguide/misc.htm#1005712|archive-date=2002-06-11 <!-- 183734 --> |year=1997}}</ref> Before that, [[Tantek Çelik]] called these scripts ''favelets'' and used that word as early as on 6 September 2001 (personal email{{clarify|date=April 2020}}). [[Brendan Eich]], who developed JavaScript at Netscape, gave this account of the origin of bookmarklets:

{{quote|They were a deliberate feature in this sense: I invented the <code>javascript:</code> URL along with JavaScript in 1995, and intended that <code>javascript:</code> URLs could be used as any other kind of URL, including being bookmark-able.

In particular, I made it possible to generate a new document by loading, e.g. <code>javascript:'hello, world'</code>, but also (key for bookmarklets) to run arbitrary script against the [[Document Object Model|DOM]] of the current document, e.g. <code>javascript:alert(document.links[0].href)</code>. The difference is that the latter kind of URL uses an expression that evaluates to the undefined type in JS. I added the void operator to JS before Netscape 2 shipped to make it easy to discard any non-undefined value in a <code>javascript:</code> URL.|Brendan Eich|3=in an email to [[Simon Willison]]<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.sitepoint.com/bookmarklets/#comment-1146713851
|title=Email from Brendan Eich
|publisher=[[SitePoint]]
|last=Willison
|first=Simon
|date=April 10, 2004
|access-date=September 26, 2014}}</ref>}}

The increased implementation of [[Content Security Policy]] (CSP) in websites has caused problems with bookmarklet execution and usage (2013-2015),<ref>{{cite web|title=Bug 866522 - Bookmarklets affected by CSP|url=https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866522}}</ref> with some suggesting that this hails the end or death of bookmarklets.<ref>{{cite web|title=Bookmarklets are Dead|date=23 October 2014|url=https://medium.com/making-instapaper/bookmarklets-are-dead-d470d4bbb626}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=The Slow Death of Bookmarklets|date=16 November 2012|url=http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/494559/The-Slow-Death-of-Bookmarklets}}</ref> William Donnelly created a work-around solution for this problem (in the specific instance of loading, referencing and using JavaScript library code) in early 2015 using a [[Greasemonkey]] userscript ([[Firefox]] / [[Pale Moon (web browser)|Pale Moon]] browser add-on extension) and a simple bookmarklet-userscript [[communication protocol]].<ref>{{cite web|title=The Resurrection of Bookmarklets|url=http://www.donnelly-house.net/programming/js/bookmarklets/bookmarklets.php}}</ref> It allows (library-based) bookmarklets to be executed on any and all websites, including those using CSP and having an https:// URI scheme. Note, however, that if/when browsers support disabling/disallowing inline script execution using CSP, and if/when websites begin to implement that feature, it will "break" this "fix".