Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Bézout's theorem
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==History== In the case of plane curves, Bézout's theorem was essentially stated by [[Isaac Newton]] in his proof of [[Newton's theorem about ovals|Lemma 28]] of volume 1 of his ''[[Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica|Principia]]'' in 1687, where he claims that two curves have a number of intersection points given by the product of their degrees.{{sfn|Newton|1966}} However, Newton had stated the theorem as early as 1665.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Stillwell |first=John |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WNjRrqTm62QC&pg=PA113 |title=Mathematics and Its History |date=1989 |publisher=Springer New York |isbn=978-1-4899-0009-8 |series= Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics|location= |pages=113 |doi=10.1007/978-1-4899-0007-4}}</ref> The general theorem was later published in 1779 in [[Étienne Bézout]]'s ''Théorie générale des équations algébriques''. He supposed the equations to be "complete", which in modern terminology would translate to [[generic polynomial|generic]]. Since with generic polynomials, there are no points at infinity, and all multiplicities equal one, Bézout's formulation is correct, although his proof does not follow the modern requirements of rigor. This and the fact that the concept of [[intersection multiplicity]] was outside the knowledge of his time led to a sentiment expressed by some authors that his proof was neither correct nor the first proof to be given.<ref>{{cite book | authorlink=Frances Kirwan | last=Kirwan | first=Frances | title=Complex Algebraic Curves | publisher=Cambridge University Press| location=United Kingdom | year=1992 | isbn=0-521-42353-8}}</ref> The proof of the statement that includes multiplicities requires an accurate definition of the [[intersection multiplicity|intersection multiplicities]], and was therefore not possible before the 20th century. The definitions of multiplicities that was given during the first half of the 20th century involved continuous and infinitesimal [[deformation theory|deformations]]. It follows that the proofs of this period apply only over the field of complex numbers. It is only in 1958 that [[Jean-Pierre Serre]] gave a purely algebraic definition of multiplicities, which led to a proof valid over any algebraically closed field.{{sfn|Serre|1965}} Modern studies related to Bézout's theorem obtained different upper bounds to system of polynomials by using other properties of the polynomials, such as the [[Bernstein–Kushnirenko theorem]], or generalized it to a large class of functions, such as [[Nash functions]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ramanakoraisina |first=R. |date=1989 |title=Bezout theorem for nash functions |journal=[[Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra]] |language=en |volume=61 |issue=3 |pages=295–301 |doi=10.1016/0022-4049(89)90080-7|doi-access=free }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Bézout's theorem
(section)
Add topic