Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Abeyance
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==English peerage law== ===History=== The most common use of the term is in the case of English [[British Peerage|peerage]] dignities. Most such peerages pass to [[Order of succession#Agnatic-cognatic succession|heirs-male]], but the ancient [[baron]]ies created by [[hereditary peer#Writs of summons|writ]], as well as some very old [[earldom]]s, pass instead to [[Order of succession#Primogeniture|heirs-general]] (by [[cognatic primogeniture]]). In this system, sons are preferred from eldest to youngest, the heirs of a son over the next son, and any son over daughters, but there is no preference among daughters: they or their heirs inherit equally. If the daughter is an only child or her sisters are deceased and have no living issue, she (or her heir) is vested with the title; otherwise, since a peerage cannot be shared nor divided, the dignity goes into abeyance between the sisters or their heirs, and is held by no one. If through lack of issue, marriage, or both, eventually only one person represents the claims of all the sisters, they can claim the dignity as a matter of right, and the abeyance is said to be terminated.<ref name="Chisholm"/> On the other hand, the number of prospective heirs can grow quite large, since each share potentially can be divided between daughters, where the owner of a share dies without leaving a son. A co-heir may petition the Crown for a termination of the abeyance. The Crown may choose to grant the petition, but if there is any doubt whatsoever as to the pedigree of the petitioner, the claim is normally referred to the [[Peerage law#Peerage disputes|Committee for Privileges]]. If the claim is unopposed, the committee will generally award the claim, unless there is evidence of [[collusion]], the peerage has been in abeyance for more than a century, or the petitioner holds less than one-third of the claim. This doctrine is a 17th-century innovation, although it is now applied retrospectively for centuries. It cannot be applied perfectly; for example, [[Thomas West, 8th Baron De La Warr|the eighth Baron De La Warr]] had three surviving sons; [[Thomas West, 9th Baron De La Warr|the first]] died without children, the second left two daughters, and the third left a son. In modern law, the title would have fallen into abeyance between the two daughters of the second son, and nobody else would have been able to claim it even if the abeyance were settled; however, in 1597, [[Thomas West, 2nd Baron De La Warr|the grandson of the third son]] (whose [[William West, 1st Baron De La Warr|father]] had been re-created [[Earl De La Warr|Baron De La Warr]] in 1570) claimed the title and its precedence. In 1604, the [[Baron le Despencer]] case was the first peerage abeyance ever settled; the second was at the [[Restoration (1660)|Restoration]] in 1660. Most subsequent abeyances (only a few dozen cases) were settled after a few years, in favour of the holder of the family properties; there were two periods in which long-abeyant peerages (in some cases peerages of doubtful reality) were brought back: between 1838 and 1841 and between 1909 and 1921.<ref>[[Complete Peerage]], Vol IV, Appendix H</ref> ''[[The Complete Peerage]]'' reports that only baronies have been called out of abeyance,<ref>Complete Peerage, Vol XI, p. 131 - supplemental number; and Vol IV, Appendix H, p. 725</ref> although the [[Earl of Cromartie|Earldom of Cromartie]] was called out of a two-year abeyance in 1895. It is entirely possible for a peerage to remain in abeyance for centuries. For example, the [[Baron Grey of Codnor|Barony of Grey of Codnor]] was in abeyance for over 490 years between 1496 and 1989, and the [[Baron Hastings|Barony of Hastings]] was similarly in abeyance for over 299 years from 1542 to 1841. Some other baronies became abeyant in the 13th century, and the abeyance has yet to be terminated. The only modern examples of titles other than a barony that have yet gone into abeyance are the [[Baron Arlington|earldom of Arlington and the viscountcy of Thetford]], which are united, and (as noted above) the earldom of Cromartie. It is no longer straightforward to claim English peerages after long abeyances. In 1927, a parliamentary Select Committee on Peerages in Abeyance recommended that no claim should be considered where the abeyance has lasted more than 100 years, nor where the claimant lays claim to less than one third of the dignity.<ref>{{hansard|1927/may/31/peerages-in-abeyance|house=lords|access-date=30 December 2015}}</ref> The [[Baron Grey of Codnor|Barony of Grey of Codnor]] was treated as an exception to this principle, as a claim to it had been submitted prior to these recommendations being made to the Sovereign.<ref>{{hansard|1989/jul/27/barony-of-grey-of-codnor|house=lords|access-date=30 December 2015}}</ref> It is common, but incorrect, to speak of peerage dignities which are dormant (i.e. unclaimed) as being in abeyance.<ref name="Chisholm"/> ===Peerages called out of abeyance by year of initial abeyance=== {{Ambox|issue=Much of this relies on a source that is probably unreliable, see [[MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/September_2023#maltagenealogy.com]] for discussion. This should probably be replaced with a thorough summary of the search results at https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Complete_Peerage_of_England_Scotland/GI7ZiCkm0oMC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=abeyance. The book is cited in the Bibliography, but it would be best to have individual references, with page numbers marked using {{tl|Rp}}, to facilitate verification and further research.}} {{Expand section|date=February 2011}}<!--This list is complete up to 1800:--> {{div col|content= *1426: [[Baron Camoys]], called out of abeyance in 1839 after 413 years.<ref name="C1">The Peerages of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom. {{usurped|1=[https://archive.today/20121210083252/http://www.leighrayment.com/peers/peersC1.htm Part C1]}}.</ref> *1455: [[Baron Cromwell]], called out of abeyance after 35 years; again in 1923 after 426 years.<ref name="C7">The Peerages of England... {{usurped|1=[https://web.archive.org/web/20080608045321/http://www.leighrayment.com/peers/peersC7.htm Part C7]}}.</ref> *1481: [[Baron Mowbray]], called out of abeyance after 2 years; again in 1878 after 100 years and 3 months.<ref name="M6">The Peerages of England... {{usurped|1=[https://web.archive.org/web/20080608023719/http://www.leighrayment.com/peers/peersM6.htm Part M6]}}.</ref> *1496: [[Baron Grey of Codnor]], called out of abeyance in 1989 after 493 years.<ref name="G3">The Peerages of England... {{usurped|1=[https://web.archive.org/web/20080608023542/http://www.leighrayment.com/peers/peersG3.htm Part G3]}}.</ref> *1508: [[Baron de Ros]], called out of abeyance after 4 years; again in 1806 (after 119 years), in 1943 (after 4 years) and in 1958 (after 2 years). *1542: [[Baron Hastings]], called out of abeyance after 299 years.<ref name="H2">The Peerages of England... {{usurped|1=[https://web.archive.org/web/20080608023706/http://www.leighrayment.com/peers/peersH2.htm Part H2]}}.</ref> *1557: [[Baron Braye]], called out of abeyance after 282 years; again in 1879 after 17 years. *1602: [[Baron Strabolgi]], called out of abeyance after 314 years. *1604: [[Baron le Despencer]], called out of abeyance after 143 years; called out again in 1763 after 7 months and in 1788 after 7 years. *1616: [[Baron Furnivall]], called out of abeyance after 31 years. *1646: [[Baron Ferrers of Chartley]], called out of abeyance after 31 years.<ref name="CP1890">{{cite book|last=Cokayne|first=George Edward|author-link=George Edward Cokayne|title=The Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom, extant, extinct or dormant|volume=III|publisher=George Bell & Sons|year=1890|location=London}}</ref>{{Rp|332β33}} *1660: [[Baron Windsor]], called out of abeyance after 18 years (the length of the [[English Civil War]]); again in 1855 after 22 years. *1721: [[Baron Clinton]], called out of abeyance after 29 years *1734: [[Baron Clifford]], called out of abeyance after 5 years; (again in 1776 and 1833 after a year) *1741: [[Baron Ferrers of Chartley]], called out of abeyance after 8 years.<ref name="CP1890" />{{Rp|333β35}} *1757: [[Baron Dudley]], called out of abeyance after 159 years. *1764: [[Baron Botetourt]], called out of abeyance after 358 years; again in 1803 after 21 years. *1780; [[Baron Willoughby de Eresby]], called out of abeyance after a year; again in 1871 after a year. *1784: [[Baron Howard de Walden]], called out of abeyance after 96 years;<ref>Complete Peerage, Vol IV, Appendix H, [https://archive.org/stream/completepeerageo04coka#page/725/mode/1up p. 725]</ref> again in 2004 after five years. *1948: [[Baron Conyers]] and [[Baron Fauconberg]], called out of abeyance after 64 years. }}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Abeyance
(section)
Add topic