Political status of Western Sahara
Template:Short description Template:Use Oxford spelling Template:Use dmy dates Template:Sahara conflict Western Sahara, formerly the colony of Spanish Sahara, is a disputed territory claimed by both the Kingdom of Morocco and the Popular Front for the Liberation of the Saguia el Hamra and Rio de Oro (Polisario Front), which is an independence movement based in Tindouf. The Annexation of Western Sahara by Morocco took place in two stages, in 1976 and 1979, and is considered illegal under international law.
Western Sahara is listed by the United Nations (UN) as a non-decolonized territory and is thus included in the United Nations list of non-self-governing territories, which regards Spain as the de jure administering state. Under international law, Western Sahara is not a legal part of Morocco, and it remains under the international laws of military occupation.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
Background
[edit]Since the Madrid Accords of 1975, a part of Western Sahara has been administered by Morocco as the Southern Provinces. Another section, the Liberated Territories, is administered by the Polisario Front as the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR). Mauritania administers the western half of the Ras Nouadhibou Peninsula. An UN-monitored cease-fire has been in effect since September 1991.
No other country than the United States and Israel has ever recognized Morocco's unilateral annexation of Western Sahara;<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref> however, certain countries such as the United Kingdom have recognized that Morocco exerts de facto control of the region. The UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) treats the status of Western Sahara as 'undetermined' but its lack of reference to the partition and the existence of the Polisario-held areas, suggests a tacit acceptance of Morocco as the administering power in the entire territory.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref> Overall, the annexation has not garnered as much attention in the international community as many other disputed annexations (e.g. the Russian annexation of Crimea).
In order to resolve the sovereignty issue, the UN has attempted to hold a referendum through the United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO), and is holding direct talks between the Kingdom of Morocco and the Polisario Front. The UN recognizes neither Moroccan<ref>United Nations Security Council: Report of the Secretary-General on the situation concerning Western Sahara (S/2006/249) paragraph 37, p. 10</ref> nor SADR sovereignty over Western Sahara.
Moroccan settlers currently make up more than two thirds of the 500,000 inhabitants of Western Sahara.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Under international law, Morocco's transfer of its own civilians into occupied territory is in direct violation of Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention (cf. Israeli and Turkish settlers).<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Positions of the main parties
[edit]Kingdom of Morocco
[edit]Template:Unreferenced section Template:Further
The official position of the Kingdom of Morocco since 1963 is that all of Western Sahara is an integral part of the kingdom. The Moroccan government refers to Western Sahara only as "Moroccan Sahara", the "Saharan provinces"Template:Citation needed, or the "Southern Provinces".
According to the Moroccan government, in 1958 the Moroccan Army of Liberation fought Spanish colonizers and almost liberated what was then Spanish Sahara.Template:Citation needed The fathers of many of the Polisario leaders were among the veterans of the Moroccan Southern Army, for example the father of Polisario leader Mohammed Abdelaziz. Morocco is supported in this viewTemplate:Clarify by a number of former Polisario founders and leaders. The Polisario Front is considered by Morocco to be a Moroccan separatist movement, referring to the Moroccan origins of most of its founding members.
On 22 January 2020, Morocco's House of Representatives voted unanimously to add Western Sahara waters to the Moroccan maritime borders.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Polisario Front and the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic
[edit]The Polisario Front, mainly backed by Algeria, is described by itself and its supporters as a national liberation movement that opposes Moroccan control of Western Sahara, whilst it is considered by Morocco and supporters of Morocco's claims over Western Sahara to be a separatist organization. It began as a movement of students who felt torn between the divergent Spanish and Moroccan influences on the country. The original goal of the Polisario, which was to end Spanish colonialism in the region, was achieved, but their neighbors, Morocco and Mauritania, seized sovereignty of the region, which the Polisario felt was entitled to self-determination and eventually independence. The Polisario engaged in guerrilla warfare with the Moroccan and Mauritanian forces. It evacuated the Sahrawi population to the Tindouf refugee camps due to Royal Moroccan Air Force bombing of the refugee camps on Sahrawi land with napalm and white phosphorus.<ref>Surendra Bhutani, Conflict on Western Sahara, Strategic Analysis, 1754-0054, Volume 2, Issue 7, 1978, Pages 251 – 256.</ref><ref>Tomás Bárbulo, La historia prohibida del Sáhara Español, Destino, Imago mundi, Volume 21, 2002, Pages 284–285</ref> The Polisario Front has called for the self-determination of the people of Western Sahara to be decided through a referendum. Although the SADR is not recognized as a state by the UN, the Polisario is considered a direct participant in the conflict and as the legitimate representative of the Sahrawi people, recognized by the United Nations since 1979.<ref name="UNGA-34"/>
.png){kind=link}
The Polisario Front argues that Morocco's position is due to economic interests (fishing, phosphate mining, and the potential for oil reserves) and political reasons (stability of the king's position and the governing elite in Morocco, deployment of most of the Moroccan Army in Western Sahara instead of in Morocco). The Polisario Front proclaimed the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic in Bir Lehlou (Western Sahara), on 27 February 1976.
Mauritania
[edit]Claims on Western Sahara had proliferated since the 1960s, fueled by Mauritanian President Moktar Ould Daddah. Before Mauritania signed the Madrid Accords and after the withdrawal of the last Spanish forces, in late 1975, the Mauritanian Army invaded the southern part of Western Sahara, while the Moroccan Army did the same in the north.
In April 1976, Mauritania and Morocco partitioned the country into three parts, Mauritania getting the southern one, which was named Tiris al-Gharbiyya. Mauritania waged four years of war against Polisario guerrillas, conducting raids on Nouakchott, attacks on the Zouerate mine train and a coup d'état that deposed Ould Daddah. Mauritania finally withdrew in the summer of 1979, after signing the Algiers Agreement with the Polisario Front, recognizing the right of self-determination for the Sahrawi people, and renouncing any claims on Western Sahara. The Moroccan Army immediately took control of the former Mauritanian territory.
Mauritania recognized the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic on 27 February 1984.
Algeria
[edit]Algeria has supported the independence of the whole of Western Sahara since 1975, when Spanish forces and settlers withdrew from the area. It is one of the few countries to do so in the Arab League. It has provided aid to the 'Polisario Front'. Algeria's role became indirect, through political and military support for the Polisario Front. Algeria recognized the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic on 6 March 1976. Its involvement in Western Sahara independence movement has interrupted the development of Algerian-Morocco diplomatic relations, which were restored in 1988.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>
United Nations
[edit]Template:Further Template:Campaignbox Western Sahara conflict
Western Sahara is on the United Nations list of non-self-governing territories. The UN has been involved since 1988 in trying to find a solution to the conflict through self-determination. In 1988, the Kingdom of Morocco and the Polisario Front agreed to settle the dispute through a referendum under the auspices of the UN that would allow the people of Western Sahara to choose between independence or integration with Morocco. In 1991, the parties agreed upon the Settlement Plan, contingent on the referendum being held the following year, but due to disputes over voter qualification, the vote was not held. In the following years, the UN argued for negotiations between Morocco and the Polisario Front to resolve the deadlock, culminating in the Manhasset negotiations in 2007–2008.
As of 2020, the mandate for MINURSO has been extended 47 times<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> and it maintains its presence in the country, but has yet to fulfill its mission by organizing a referendum.
Positions of other states
[edit]Template:Update Template:Further
Some states are supportive of the "right of self-determination of the Sahrawi people", including the option of autonomy under Moroccan sovereignty.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Some states have changed their opinion frequently or have given separate announcements of support for both Morocco and the Polisario Front/SADR (Egypt, Italy, Lesotho, Russia, Rwanda, Yemen, etc.).<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
Some of the states announcing support of the "right of self-determination" currently recognize the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic. Not all of the states that have terminated diplomatic relations with or withdrawn recognition of the SADR have announced their support for the Moroccan claims.
The overwhelming majority of United Nations member states have not announced any position.
States supporting Polisario and the SADR on Western Sahara
[edit]States supporting Morocco's autonomy proposal
[edit]Template:Disputed section Template:Legend Template:Legend
Position of United Nations Security Council permanent members
[edit]- France
France claims neutrality on the Western Sahara issue, despite its military involvement in the Western Sahara War on the side of Morocco and Mauritania (see Operation Lamantin). In 2009<ref>Security Council under pressure over human rights in Western Sahara Pravda, 27 April 2010</ref><ref>Francia impide que la ONU vigile los derechos humanos en el Sáhara El País, 1 May 2009 Template:In lang</ref> and 2010,<ref>Opposition of France to monitoring of human rights in Western Sahara "disgrace for Europe" (Austrian parliamentarian).Template:Dead link SPS, 23 April 2010</ref><ref>Polisario Front denounces blocking by France of human rights monitoring in Western Sahara. SPS, 29 April 2010</ref> France used the threat of its veto power to block the establishment of Human Rights monitoring by the MINURSO in Western Sahara. France has been a major backer of the Moroccan autonomy proposal and in the EU negotiated the concession of the advanced status to Morocco.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref>
On 30 July 2024, coinciding with the 25th anniversary of Throne Day (Morocco), French President Emmanuel Macron sent a letter to King Mohammed VI of Morocco clarifying France's new position on the Western Sahara. He stated that he "considers that the present and future of Western Sahara lie within the framework of Moroccan sovereignty" and affirmed France's support for Morocco's autonomy plan proposed in 2007 by saying "our support for the autonomy plan proposed by Morocco in 2007 is clear and unwavering," adding that this plan "constitutes now the only basis to achieve a just, lasting, and negotiated political solution, in accordance with United Nations Security Council resolutions." Macron emphasized France's support for Morocco's efforts to promote economic and social development in the region. This marked a notable change of diplomatic stance; The French authorities previously argued that Morocco’s plan for autonomy was a “serious and credible” basis for discussion, but not the only one.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
From 28 to 30 October 2024, Macron conducted his three-day state visit to Morocco's capital accompanied by a delegation of French ministers and business leaders. Notable cabinet members present included French Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau, Economy Minister Antoine Armand and Culture Minister Rachida Dati – herself of Moroccan origin.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> On the first day, the King and Macron jointly chaired the signing ceremony of 22 key deals between the nations, addressing: railway, aviation, education, and sustainable energy/infrastructure.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
On 29 October 2024, in an address to the Moroccan Parliament, Macron said French companies "will support the development" of the Sahara, pledging "investments and sustainable support initiatives to benefit local populations."<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> This includes French-sponsored projects and initiatives in Dakhla, Western Sahara and the Guelmim-Oued Noun region—more broadly—amounting to 10 billion euros ($10.8 billion). As part of the objective "to accelerate" partnerships between France and Morocco, MGH Energy, a French company focused on decarbonizing transportation by air and sea, also plans to partner with a Moroccan gas retailer to produce fuel near Dakhla. In an effort to begin its first phase of operations by 2030, the company said it planned to invest 4.8 billion euros ($5.2 billion). 2030 also aligns with when Morocco hopes its Atlantic Ocean port under construction in Dakhla will open, stimulating an unprecedented flow of exports from Morocco and its neighbors in West Africa.<ref>https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/france-announces-new-investments-disputed-western-sahara-115284457,</ref>
- United States
The Obama administration disassociated itself from the Moroccan autonomy plan in 2009, however, reversing the Bush-backed support of the Moroccan plan, and returning to a pre-Bush position, wherein the option of an independent Western Sahara is on the table again.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>
In April 2009, 229 members of the U.S. House of Representatives, a clear majority and more than 50 more than the number who signed the letterTemplate:Clarify in 2007, called on President Obama to support Morocco's autonomy plan and to assist in drawing the conflict to a close. The signersTemplate:Clarify included Democratic Majority Leader Steny Hoyer and Republican Minority Leader John Boehner. In addition to acknowledging that Western Sahara has become a recruiting post for radical Islamists, the letter affirmed that the conflict is "the single greatest obstacle impending the security and cooperation necessary to combat" terrorism in the Maghreb.<ref name="moroccanamericanpolicy.org">House of Representatives letter to President Barack Obama Template:Webarchive. Retrieved 21 February 2010.</ref> The letter referenced UN Security Council Resolution 1813 (2008), and encouraged President Obama to follow the policy set by President Clinton and followed by President Bush.<ref name="moroccanamericanpolicy.org"/> The congressmen expressed concerns about Western Sahara's viability. They referenced a UN fact-finding mission to Western Sahara which confirmed the State Department's view that the Polisario proposal, which ultimately stands for independence, would lead to a non-viable state.<ref name="moroccanamericanpolicy.org"/> In closing, the letter stated, "We remain convinced that the U.S. position, favoring autonomy for Western Sahara under Moroccan sovereignty is the only feasible solution. We urge you to both sustain this longstanding policy, and to make clear, in both words and actions, that the United States will work to ensure that the UN process continues to support this framework as the only realistic compromise that can bring this unfortunate and longstanding conflict to an end."<ref name="moroccanamericanpolicy.org"/>
Commenting on a 2004 free trade agreement with Morocco, US Trade Representative Robert Zoellick stated in a letter to Congressman Joe Pitts in response to his questioning, "the United States and many other countries do not recognize Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara and have consistently urged the parties to work with the United Nations to resolve the conflict by peaceful means. The Free Trade Agreement will not include Western Sahara."<ref name = "Qantara">Template:Cite news</ref><ref name="USA">Letter from the trade office to Congressman Joe Pitts Template:Webarchive</ref>
In April 2013, the United States proposed that MINURSO monitored human rights (as all the other UN mission since 1991) in Western Sahara, a move that Morocco strongly opposed, cancelling the annual African Lion military exercises with U.S. Army troops.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> Also in mid-April, United States Ambassador to Morocco Samuel L. Kaplan declared during a conference in Casablanca that the Moroccan autonomy plan "can't be the only basis in these negotiations", referring to the UN sponsored talks between the Polisario Front and Morocco.<ref>Morocco’s autonomy proposal "can’t be the only basis in these negotiations," says Samuel L. Kaplan Template:Webarchive Algerian Press Service, 16 April 2013</ref>
On 10 December 2020, President Donald Trump announced that the United States would officially recognize Morocco's claims over Western Sahara, as a result of Morocco agreeing to normalize relations with Israel.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> In April 2021, the Biden administration stated that they would not reverse the decision.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite web</ref> In November 2021, Antony Blinken said that the Biden administration "[continues] to view Morocco’s autonomy plan as serious, credible, and realistic, and one potential approach to satisfy the aspirations of the people of Western Sahara".<ref name="USDS 2021">Template:Cite web</ref>
States which have not announced any position
[edit]The following states and entities have not announced any position:
- Americas: Argentina, Bahamas, Chile
- Africa: Eritrea, Tunisia
- Europe: Andorra, Bulgaria, Belarus, Czech Republic, Monaco, San Marino, Liechtenstein, Vatican City, Malta, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Moldova, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Georgia, Armenia, Switzerland
- Asia: People's Republic of China (UNSC-P5), Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Palestine, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Turkey, Pakistan, Nepal, Thailand, Singapore, Japan, Mongolia, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Brunei, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines
- Oceania: Australia, New Zealand, Tonga, Samoa, Niue, Palau, Micronesia, Marshall Islands
- Others: Abkhazia, Republic of China (Taiwan), Kosovo, Somaliland, Transnistria
- Sovereign Military Order of Malta
Positions of international organizations
[edit]| Organization | Membership | Position |
|---|---|---|
| File:Flag of the African Union.svg African Union (Formerly OAU) | 22 February 1982 | The Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic is a fully recognized AU founding member.<ref name="African Union">Template:Cite web</ref> The African Union supports the right of self-determination of the Sahrawi people.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> |
| File:Flag of the Andean Community of Nations.svg Andean Community of Nations | 26 October 2011 (Observer) | The Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic is an Observer member in the framework of the Andean Parliament.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref> |
| Template:Flagicon Arab League | Not a member. | The Arab League supports "the integrity of the Moroccan territorial sovereignty" without specifying a position on a solution to the conflict. |
| File:Emblem of Maghreb.svg Arab Maghreb Union | Not a member. | The Arab Maghreb Union has not made a unanimous statement about its position on the conflict between Morocco and the Polisario Front. |
| File:Flag of CARICOM.svg Caribbean Community (CARICOM) | Not a member. | The CARICOM supports the right of the Western Sahara people's to self-determination, consistent with the principles and purposes of the Charter of the United Nations.<ref>Statement by H.E. ambassador Raymond Wolfe, permanent representative of Jamaica to the United Nations on behalf of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) – 4th Committee of the 65th session United Nations general assembly, 11 October 2010 Template:Webarchive</ref> |
| Community of Latin American and Caribbean States | Not a member. | The CELAC supports efforts by all parties to achieve a just, lasting and mutually acceptable political solution that would provide for the right of self-determination for the inhabitants.<ref name="UN4th2012"/> |
| File:Flag of Europe.svg European Union | Not a member. | The EU supports the efforts by the Secretary General of the United Nations and his Personal Envoy to find a just, lasting and mutually acceptable political solution which will allow the self-determination of the people of Western Sahara as provided for in the resolutions of the United Nations.<ref>European Parliament resolution of 25 November 2010 on the situation in Western Sahara European Parliament, 25 November 2012, Strasbourg.</ref><ref>EU Statement – United Nations 4th Committee: Western Sahara Template:Webarchive European Union @ United Nations</ref> |
| Non-Aligned Movement | Not a member. | The NAM supports the right of the Western Sahara people's to self-determination, consistent with the principles and purposes of the Charter of the United Nations and General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> |
| Template:Flagicon Organisation of Islamic Cooperation | Not a member. | The OIC supports the achievement of a just, lasting and mutually acceptable political solution that would provide for the self-determination of the people of Western Sahara consistent with relevant resolutions. |
| Rio Group | Not a member. | The Rio Group supports the resolutions adopted by the UN to achieve a just, lasting and mutually acceptable solution that leads to the self-determination of the people of Western Sahara, in the context of compatible accords with the principles of the UN charter and the Resolution 1514 (XV) of the General Assembly and other pertinent resolutions.<ref>Template:Cite newsTemplate:Dead link</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref> |
| File:Flag of UNASUR.svg Union of South American Nations | Not a member. | The UNASUR supports for the achievement of a just, lasting and mutually acceptable political solution that would provide for the self-determination of the people of Western Sahara consistent with relevant resolutions.<ref name="UN4th2012" /> |
| Template:Flagu | Not a member. | The UN does not recognize Moroccan claims, as Western Sahara remains in its list of non-self-governing territories since 1963. The Security Council had argued for direct negotiations between Morocco and the Polisario Front.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref> It had approved more than 100 resolutions supporting the right of Self-determination of the Sahrawi people.Template:Citation needed |
The SADR is also a member of the Asian-African Strategic Partnership, formed at the 2005 Asian-African Conference, over Moroccan objections to SADR participation.<ref>Template:Cite news</ref>
In 2006, the SADR participated in a conference of the Permanent Conference of Political Parties of the Latin American and the Caribbean.<ref name="Permanent Conference of Political Parties of the Latin American and the Caribbean">Template:Cite web</ref>
- African Union
On 22 February 1982, the SADR secured membership in the Organisation of African Unity.<ref>Template:Cite journal</ref>
In 1984, Morocco withdrew from the AU's predecessor, the Organization of African Unity (OAU), in protest of the group's recognition of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR).<ref>Template:Cite web</ref>
The African Union (formerly the OAU) has given the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic full recognition,<ref name="African Union"/> and accepted it as a member state (which has led Morocco to leave the union.<ref name="UNPoliticalAlliances">Template:Cite web</ref>). Mohamed Abdelaziz, president of the SADR, has been Vice-president of the OUA in 1985, and of the AU in 2002.Template:Citation needed
In 2016, King Mohammed VI of Morocco declared his country's intention to become a member of the African Union. On the same day, twenty-eight African countries or about 52% of the 54 UN recognized member states of the African Union signed a petition to expel the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic from the African Union.<ref name="newswire" /><ref name="mon2016">Template:Cite web</ref> At the same time, AU Commission Chairwoman Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma reaffirmed the AU's support for Western Sahara's independence.<ref name="mon2016" />
- European Union
The European Union supports the right of self-determination of the Sahrawi people (the MINURSO UN-sponsored referendum),<ref name="EUposition">Algeria, EU have same position on Western Sahara issue, says Algerian FMTemplate:Dead link</ref> but does not recognize the Polisario Front.<ref name="Polisario-EU">Template:Cite web</ref> Over practical issues such as fishing in the EEZ the EU deals with Morocco as the country currently exercising "jurisdiction, but not sovereignty" over Western Sahara territory.<ref name="Morocco-EU">THE EU'S APPROACH TOWARDS WESTERN SAHARA Template:Webarchive</ref> In addition, members of the EFTA trade bloc have made statements excluding Western Sahara from the Moroccan-EFTA free trade agreement.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> In December 2016, the European Court of Justice reaffirmed in Council v Front populaire pour la libération de la saguia-el-hamra et du rio de oro (Front Polisario) that Morocco has no basis for sovereignty over Western Sahara<ref name="ecj2016">Template:Cite web</ref> and that trade deals with Morocco cannot apply to the occupied territory.<ref name="forbesecj">Template:Cite web</ref>
- United Nations
Since 1966, the United Nations request for the celebration of a referendum for enabling the "indigenous population" to exercise freely their right to self-determination.<ref>Template:Cite web</ref> Since 1979, the United Nations has recognized the Polisario Front as the representative of the people of Western Sahara, and considered Morocco as an occupying force.<ref name="UNGA-34">Template:Cite web</ref>
Former United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan stressed, in his last report on Western Sahara, to the Security Council:
- "The Security Council would not be able to invite parties to negotiate about Western Saharan autonomy under Moroccan sovereignty, for such wording would imply recognition of Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara, which was out of the question as long as no States Member of the United Nations had recognized that sovereignty".<ref name="Moroccan sovereignty">Template:Cite web</ref>
See also
[edit]- Foreign relations of Morocco
- Foreign relations of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic
- List of states with limited recognition
- Polisario Front
Notes
[edit]References
[edit]Bibliography
[edit]- Hodges, Tony. Western Sahara: Roots of a Desert War, Lawrence Hill & Company, 1983, Template:ISBN, p. 308
- Hodges, Tony, and Pazzanita, Anthony. Historical Dictionary of Western Sahara, 2 ed., Scarecrow Press, 1994, Template:ISBN, pp. 378–379.